• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Jack Clarke


Geppetto said:
As good as. We've accepted a £20m offer from Ipswich, this includes £5m add ons and we owe Spurs 20% apparently, so we're looking at 12m excluding add ons.
Click to expand...

If the fee is £15m plus add ons. Spurs are taking 40%x £15m so we would only get £9m. I would assume that Spurs could also be entitled to 40% x £5m add ons, which we possibly won’t even see if they are all or even part based upon Ipswich staying up
 
summaz said:
Skunk hater, yet again it has been an absolute pleasure mate. Please take a seat alongside Upthere, Di Canios Knees and Prehab. Thank you for your service.
Click to expand...
He’s never got anything right for years to be fair don’t know why people believe them. They’re all full of cartoons
 
Steve F said:
If the fee is £15m plus add ons. Spurs are taking 40%x £15m so we would only get £9m. I would assume that Spurs could also be entitled to 40% x £5m add ons, which we possibly won’t even see if they are all or even part based upon Ipswich staying up
Click to expand...
It's not 40% apparently
 
---Nemo--- said:
Could go a few ways but two paths that spring to mind for me are we could be doing what our gaffer's previous club laid on him, or we could, with his input, be about to adopt a style of play that moves us away from being a one trick pony. Who knows, as ever I'll wait and see how it pans out for us and for Clarke.
Click to expand...
We were only a one-trick pony due to having no other attacking threat. We’ve only added Alan Browne as it stands to that squad who won’t affect that
 
KLDs Sunglasses said:
Selling Stewart was the correct call at the time, this is a totally different situation however. Baffling decision from the club to sell our best player for a total of 12 million quid with a week left of the transfer window.
Click to expand...
It isn’t totally different. I’m not disputing that that sale worked out well for us, I’m arguing the fact that many said it would result in us upgrading our recruitment. Instead we seemingly spaffed it on players like Hjelde, Rusyn etc.
 
Archibald Von D said:
Maybe the future sell on % is the pivotal thing in all this, yes it feels like we’ve had our pants pulled down now, but the likelihood is that Ipswich will get relegated, If we have a 40% sell on fee and he is sold for 60m next year, that could justify the piss poor selling price now,
Click to expand...
If there's a sell on clause, it doesn't sound like KLD is planning on selling anytime soon.
 
Gaz said:
My worry is we’ve already fu**ed it up with Neil, maybe they think making him captain will help…
Click to expand...
Only we could make a local lad who came through our academy captain for the conspiracy theorists to conspire on here and look for/push alternative meanings. Grow up
 
Steve F said:
If the fee is £15m plus add ons. Spurs are taking 40%x £15m so we would only get £9m. I would assume that Spurs could also be entitled to 40% x £5m add ons, which we possibly won’t even see if they are all or even part based upon Ipswich staying up
Click to expand...
Where'd you get 40% from?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top