Has Neil signed a new deal?
People are still arguing that today, as if it's unique to Sunderland and a sign of ambition that we pay the players every monthIt’s alreet though according to some though, we don’t need to spend money as we have to pay wages and signing on fees for frees(every club has to pay that as well)
Was being smooth brained, was thinking about Rigg but Neil extended last year as well
Totally agree mate, said it for months now “ we will not sign a permanent striker fit for purpose” until Clarke is sold. Prob the last 48 hrs , which we will then have the “ ran out of time unfortunately to get someone in”
Our wage bill was 25.6 million in the most recent accounts, I don't half read a load of crap on here
19th lowest in the league?
Na not me although he sounds like good crack
Posters stay the same though don't they ? They seem to do anyway
Are we not past ‘happy clappers’ and ‘bed wetters’?
No but he only signed an extension last season didn't he? He's contract til 2026.
Posters are still quoting figures off our leagues one years. How can we be signing players like Ballard on long contracts on piss poor money ???
What on earth are you on about it’s like you would revel in us failing.Haway lads ffs , its just a blip
That was the ridiculous comment a poster used to describe the last 18 months recruitment, and where have I said I want us to fail, again there you go making stuff up
I am ìn the pro-manangement camp and think this is terrible planning. There appears to be an element of not being able to get important stuff over line which has not improved over the last 12 months.
We did
He wasn’t and he didn’t, people are being hyper critical of him because of the striker situation and I understand why, but for a teenage striker making his first start he played alright.
People need to lower their expectations around him, he should be playing around 20 games and most of them coming from the bench but has been thrown in at the deep end due to the club’s shortcomings in the transfer market.
