Bid rejected for Clarke

[Mackemansj1]

I have a feeling a large chunk of a 10m fee would be owed to Tottenham.

This, we got him for relatively low upfront fee levy is no mug he'd have loaded that deal with add-ons and a sell on fee to back load it being a small upfront payment.

 

[East Riding Mackem]

£7 million

 

[Wayne The Punk]

£7 million

what a f***ing joke Nixon is

 

[stevo]

He went from Leeds to Spurs for 10 mil a few years ago.Well this will tell us a lot about the ownership.

 

[Wayne The Punk]

He went from Leeds to Spurs for 10 mil a few years ago.Well this will tell us a lot about the ownership.

It will be an undisclosed fee if it happens

 

[Howard the Duck]

I think safc would accept 10 million with add ons

I think it was reported to be a 30 percent sell on fee.

So you think that, in effect, we'll accept an offer that pockets us £6.7m for one of the Championship's top performers, who reportedly has at least three Premier League clubs after him, isn't itching for a move, is 21 years old and has 3 years left on his contract?

What are you basing that on?

 

[Binxy]

He went from Leeds to Spurs for 10 mil a few years ago.Well this will tell us a lot about the ownership.

He must have went back owa since then.

 

[sofatester]

He went from Leeds to Spurs for 10 mil a few years ago.Well this will tell us a lot about the ownership.

This ^^^^ he was only a young kid then. I mean he still is but he's 10 times the player he was then ffs

 

[SaintJude]

£7million is a joke. Unless the extras means it roses to 15/20 then great but if not. They clearly don’t want him as much as they are letting on

 

[JHmackem]

I think for them to keep on bidding would indicate Clarke is open to a move away. He's probably easy, happy to stay but intrigued about a move. Don't begrudge a move to Burnley because they're building a good young side, but you could double that and I'd still feel let down.

Genuinely, you could triple it and I'd still be let down.

In this market, anything less than £20m would be bad business.

3-4 years left on his contract, English, 24 goal contributions last season, only 22 years old.

 

[Boot Cleaner]

Nixon and Captain Wanksock know fuck all

 

[genewolf]

7m? I'd be blocking all calls from Burnley. They're taking the piss.

 

[Wayne The Punk]

Genuinely, you could triple it and I'd still be let down.

In this market, anything less than £20m would be bad business.

3-4 years left on his contract, English, 24 goal contributions last season, only 22 years old.

£28 million or fuck off, goodbye. New answerphone message

 

[ferryhill mackem]

nixon been on the drink before writing that

 

[Wayne The Punk]

7m? I'd be blocking all calls from Burnley. They're taking the piss.

Its Nixon man

 

[rubberface]

Nixon saying we only want £10mill!! He should be sacked for writing absolute bollocks. Shame on him, that's his profession aswel.

 

[Stefanschwarzshorts]

This has got to be a joke or he’s trolling...Surely?

Yes it’s Nixon and hel be ridiculed but he does get bits about us right. Those numbers quoted though - they can not be real.

 

[stevo]

It will be an undisclosed fee if it happens

I feel sick ,got to be somebody taking the piss this mate.

 

[Zidane]

We shouldn't even be even talking to them at offers of around £7m as that will just encourage Burnley to keep adding a million on and eventually getting a then unsettled player for £10m.

It should be from very start "£20m take or or leave it"

They will then dissappear for a while settling it all down and if they really want him will be back at the end of the window starting at £14m rising to even higher

 

[Wayne The Punk]

I feel sick ,got to be somebody taking the piss this mate.

I am not worried about the fee, as I think we will get what we want, I will however be gutted if he leaves