• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


How can I offer you one it's a 3d object you fool.
You mentioned it.
Are you saying you have to make it flat to actually make it work?
Go and have a look at one in a shop take some string and a scale rule and check some distances
And what should I do with the string against what?
So you have no idea of the gradient that is so slight it not noticed yet definitely isn't flat because your world has a raised centre.
Is that because there is no gradient after all?
I'll let you decide that.
As mentioned, it just appears to, due to the orbits. Read the article; it's clearly explained.
Due to what orbits?
 
Yes, and with mathematics. Something you clearly know nothing about.

Thats not proof, which has been pointed out to you several times.

You really are getting desperate now. Its like playing bingo with every quote you say :lol:
He is clinging to "water level" and echoing back what we say about him living in an isolated fantasy world, but can not say how he knows water is level. Basically because he put up one experiment and it was laughably silly.
 
No, they don't work on a globe map at all.
Yes it does, once again.......

Earth diameter 7915.5 miles, this has been measured and corroborated by many many different people across the globe, it can be done from your own back garden in fact. This cant be refuted by simply saying "Its wrong" which seems to be the basis of all of your arguments.

London to Sydney 10553 miles, again this is an undisputed fact, taking into account the range of aircraft, the amount of fuel needed to fly that far, the systems which measure distance and all of the pilots who have ever flown this route. This cant be refuted by saying "All the pilots are liars" which, again, seems to be the basis of all of your arguments.
 
You lost.
Lost what?
Yes, and with mathematics. Something you clearly know nothing about.
Can you offer a brief example of what he did or are you unsure?
Thats not proof, which has been pointed out to you several times.
It's nailed-on proof.
You really are getting desperate now. Its like playing bingo with every quote you say :lol:
I couldn't be more confident and calm.
Yes it does, once again.......

Earth diameter 7915.5 miles, this has been measured and corroborated by many many different people across the globe, it can be done from your own back garden in fact. This cant be refuted by simply saying "Its wrong" which seems to be the basis of all of your arguments.

Ahhh, ok then you can tell me how you'd do it from your own back garden then, right?
London to Sydney 10553 miles, again this is an undisputed fact, taking into account the range of aircraft, the amount of fuel needed to fly that far, the systems which measure distance and all of the pilots who have ever flown this route.
The route is key and flying over what is key.

This cant be refuted by saying "All the pilots are liars" which, again, seems to be the basis of all of your arguments.
You seem to be offering that. I'm not calling pilots liars. I'm saying they have no clue if they are flying over a globe except for being told they are.
 
Last edited:
The route is key and flying over what is key.


You seem to be offering that. I'm not calling pilots liars. I'm saying they have no clue if they are flying over a globe except for being told they are.
You act like you can't look down from an airplane and see what the ground below you looks like.
 
Yes it does, it was measured thousands of years ago. Where is your proof that it doesnt exist? Go on, go and belittle thousands of scientists who have worked and dedicated their entire lives in that field of work whereas you just act like a condescending disrespectful clown who has no proof of what you are saying,

Oh and lets not forget that you belittled astronauts who gave their lives to explore space because you think space doesnt exist.

RIP

 
Absolute bollocks.

It's the reverse but you're just too dumb or stubborn to accept it.

Look up great circles. (You won't of course)
I did look up great circles. Saying great circles does not offer anything realistic.

If arguing for a horizon at sea level by using a suppoosed global edge, as silly as that is, a plane destroys that, and yet we still see a theoretical horizon line.
Why? Because Earth is not a globe.
 
I did look up great circles. Saying great circles does not offer anything realistic.

If arguing for a horizon at sea level by using a suppoosed global edge, as silly as that is, a plane destroys that, and yet we still see a theoretical horizon line.
Why? Because Earth is not a globe.

I only returned to post the NASA press release regarding the passing of astronaut James McDivitt and I see it's your usual gormless word salad.

I'm out.
 
Of course, always. You can't offer to look down to gain any horizon. You know this.
I'm not offering looking down to gain any horizon. What does that even mean? You can look up and down, pilots do it too.
From a height the horizon will be a little further away from you if that's what you mean, but it's still there, because we live (and fly over) a globe.
 
Back
Top