• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

Why though if you understand and know about it?
Because it's my musing. My theory. My hypothesis. My experiments.
It is ripe for ridicule by those who are taught spinning globes and light-year balls of fire, etc.
Now I know you're interested but you can't help yourself which is a shame.


For example what led you to think it's like the lemon squeezer map rather than flat, and if something pushed you in that direction you must have an idea of height or gradient.
I have.
You seem to know a lot about intricate superfluid reactions on a dome you can't possibly have been to,
I do.
I thought a rough gradient or slope would be one of the more basic discoveries you have made in your quest for truth.
As basic as you want to make it.
Guess science works in strange ways.
Not really. Science is science. It is what it is and those who pursue the jigsaw of it can piece together some of it.
Or is that strangeways 🤔
There you go. You can't help it. ;)
 

Because it's my musing. My theory. My hypothesis. My experiments.
It is ripe for ridicule by those who are taught spinning globes and light-year balls of fire, etc.
Now I know you're interested but you can't help yourself which is a shame.



I have.

I do.

As basic as you want to make it.

Not really. Science is science. It is what it is and those who pursue the jigsaw of it can piece together some of it.

There you go. You can't help it. ;)
So you allegedly have this info but you won't share it, Interesting, people may give a lot more credence to your musings if you actually shared stuff.
So tell me more about your knowledge of superfluids and how they react on a frozen ice dome, where did you get this information?
 
Yep but then again we're only talking a few miles, not 100.
Aren't scopes amazing though? To see lights in the sky that are said to be 4000 trillion and up to 16,000 trillion miles away and that's just with the naked eye and the scopes that can let us see way more miles.
If scopes can get shots of things said to be 4000 trillion miles away, why can't they get them of things 100 miles away? Could it possibly be that there is something blocking the view?
 
Because it's my musing. My theory. My hypothesis. My experiments.
It is ripe for ridicule by those who are taught spinning globes and light-year balls of fire, etc.
Now I know you're interested but you can't help yourself which is a shame.



I have.

I do.

As basic as you want to make it.

Not really. Science is science. It is what it is and those who pursue the jigsaw of it can piece together some of it.

There you go. You can't help it. ;)
So still no proof then despite what you said? What a liar :lol:
 
If scopes can get shots of things said to be 4000 trillion miles away, why can't they get them of things 100 miles away? Could it possibly be that there is something blocking the view?
They can't get shots of things 4000 trillion miles away. That's just the silly stories taught to people.
 
Put your mind to work. I'm pretty confident you've been going in-depth.
I have no idea how you would know this that's why I'm asking?
Must be quite a unique situation, superfluids on a giant ice dome, how would you replicate that situation to come up with evidence or even a general understanding?
Even a brief idea or overview would be very interesting.
 
They can't get shots of things 4000 trillion miles away. That's just the silly stories taught to people.
How far can you see on a clear day? A few miles?

Now stand on one side of a hill. Wait for someone to walk over the top. Could you see them before, when you were on one side of the hill and they were on the other? Why or why not? What part of their body do you see first?
 
Last edited:
I have no idea how you would know this that's why I'm asking?
You already said I haven't done anything so why are you asking?
Must be quite a unique situation, superfluids on a giant ice dome
On?
, how would you replicate that situation to come up with evidence or even a general understanding?
Evacuation.
Even a brief idea or overview would be very interesting.
I put plenty out and it was overlooked/ignored or cast off as lies or idiocy, so pick any or all if you wish.
 
How far can you see on a clear day? A few miles?

Now stand on one side of a hill. Wait for someone to walk over the top. Could you see them before, when you were on one side of the hill and they were on the other? Why or why not? What part of their body do you see first?
Tell me something. Do you walk up a hill flat-footed with your body angled outwards looking at the sky or do you bend your feet and try to angle upright in order to negotiate it?
 
Tell me something. Do you walk up a hill flat-footed with your body angled outwards looking at the sky or do you bend your feet and try to angle upright in order to negotiate it?
No, you answer the questions first. If you can't answer a question with anything other than an additional question - which is literally irrelevant anyway: the answer to your question, regardless of what it is, does not change the answers to any of mine - you're not even attempting to defend your position.

You're just saying "look over there" and hoping nobody ever comes back to make you provide any actual answer.

I'm sitting here, asking you what should be very easy questions in my quest to understand your position as to the oceans, and you're refusing to answer.
 
Last edited:
You said you had though so I'm interested in what you have done to replicate the superfluid/dome situation.
You said I hadn't but you are extremely interested.
I say put your mind to work for you.
No, you answer the questions first. If you can't answer a question with anything other than an additional question - which is literally irrelevant anyway: the answer to your question, regardless of what it is, does not change the answers to any of mine - you're not even attempting to defend your position.

You're just saying "look over there" and hoping nobody ever comes back to make you provide any actual answer.
You really need to get the position of view and you'll better get why the globe is utter nonsense.
 
You said I hadn't but you are extremely interested.
I say put your mind to work for you.

You really need to get the position of view and you'll better get why the globe is utter nonsense.
I think you really need to explain what it looks like when you watch a man walk over a hill from the opposite side.
 
Back
Top