• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

So how come I've told you several times how o see for yourself that the Earth spins and not whatever you choose to call the Sun and stars, yet you still ask? Still deny that my proof exists and still claim all I know is what I'm told? Because you ignore it.
You don't have any proof for s spinning globe. None at all no matter how much you say you have.
If you think you definitely have then show me your proof. That's all I'm asking for.
Plenty want to know the experiments and try them out.... you consistently refuse to share them. "Simple experiments" gives them nothing, again, for reasons.
I've given plenty of snippets but naturally, they're waved away as I would expect.
Yeah you're right, I mixed things up to confuse you and hide the reality of our planet.
You don't, you're just following the narrative and I understand that.
 
Last edited:

Flat as in what?
I don't think it's flat so where are you going with this? Unless you want to argue just water and then I'll go with flat.

I'm not in charge of everyone so what they think is out of my hands.
As for me, I don't think the entire Earth is flat. You've been well aware of this so using this as your argument is basically pointless as far as I'm concerned.
As intelligent as I think you are...and I just think stuff like this weakens your arguments.


I agree it can't be done based on trying to copy a globe to 2d but I do keep saying this.
But it can be done by changing the entire landmass into different positions and throwing the actual map into a massive alternate configuration.
Stop being pedantic knacker you know exactly what I meant by flat. 2d, lemon squeezer, whatever the hell you call your fantasy world.
OK then, we didn't tell you where to put the landmasses or follow any lead, it was your map to arrange as you pleased, arrange those places how you wish to make it work, that was what you were asked to do, let's see what you actually think the layout is, roughly to scale.
 
Stop being pedantic knacker you know exactly what I meant by flat. 2d, lemon squeezer, whatever the hell you call your fantasy world.
Then call it for what is it, not what I don't subscribe to.
OK then, we didn't tell you where to put the landmasses or follow any lead, it was your map to arrange as you pleased, arrange those places how you wish to make it work, that was what you were asked to do, let's see what you actually think the layout is, roughly to scale.
To arrange it how I think it works would be offering a whole myriad of denials and posts that would go on and on and on about a map, so I'll pass on that.
I have what I have and I will offer snippets and you can take from it whatever you wish, good bad, or ugly.
 
Then call it for what is it, not what I don't subscribe to.

To arrange it how I think it works would be offering a whole myriad of denials and posts that would go on and on and on about a map, so I'll pass on that.
I have what I have and I will offer snippets and you can take from it whatever you wish, good bad, or ugly.
So you can't rearrange even 5 places out of hundreds so they work on a circle using known distances.
You literally can't put 5 dots in a circle 🤔😂😂
Sounds like it's impossible for you, I wonder why.
Surely it would be beneficial to show us that even these 5 can work and what you say may have some merit, otherwise it looks like it's another blatant lie about something you say can be done.
Like all of these simple experiments yet you won't explain any to us so we can try ourselves?
Then call it for what is it, not what I don't subscribe to.
You also never did come back as to the approximate gradient of your world to the centre, 1 in 100, 1 in 200?
Just roughly?
Many thousands of years of decay got Earth to this point. And not as any globe we live upon, either.
What experiments or study brought you to this conclusion, can you share please
 
Last edited:
So you can't rearrange even 5 places out of hundreds so they work on a circle using known distances.
You literally can't put 5 dots in a circle 🤔😂😂
Sounds like it's impossible for you, I wonder why.
Surely it would be beneficial to show us that even these 5 can work and what you say may have some merit, otherwise it looks like it's another blatant lie about something you say can be done.
Like all of these simple experiments yet you won't explain any to us so we can try ourselves?

You also never did come back as to the approximate gradient of your world to the centre, 1 in 100, 1 in 200?
Just roughly?

What experiments or study brought you to this conclusion, can you share please
Short answer, no.
 
I've established lots of evidence and some proof. You have established nothing other than a narrative following.
No you haven't. You thinking you have just fuels the stupid fire. You've pretended to have experimented but actually haven't. Your only pretend test is one where you don't understand what you are looking for.
As for proof, other than proof of your own gullibility and scientific ignorance, you've not offered a crumb.
 
Short answer, no.
Excellent now he admits known distances can't be configured on a 2d map.
Distances that are real and travelled and measured.
So basically the world can't be how you think, I'm not saying it's a globe but it's definitely not your lemon squeezer version as you can't put 5 countries on a circle using that model. Back to the drawing board Nukey, what next, a washing up bowl world, will that work?
 
I wonder if today is the day we will get details of one or two of his "plenty of experiments". I suspect not.
A simple answer "no"
He knows we all know he hasn't done any, he's so quick to share things he finds on YouTube or drawings from the net to back up his "arguments" yet he hasn't shared a single experiment he has done himself.
 
Back
Top