Put a flat earthier into space

[payne]

There’s only so many beds in the asylum.

I wish I didn't have to so to work as someone else invented the concept of work and therefore I couldn't partake as I'd have to invent my own system.

 

[fyl2u]

I suspect I may be on ignore. Imagine a flat earth conspiracy nutjob actively avoiding facts when gifted to them on a platter. With gold sprinkles.

Yeah, me too. He hasn't replied to a single thing I've posted at him since the thread was bumped the other day.

 

[payne]

Yeah, me too. He hasn't replied to a single thing I've posted at him since the thread was bumped the other day.

He is not a fan of your style of reply which matches his own.

No
No
Wrong
No Proof
Liar

 

[fyl2u]

He is not a fan of your style of reply which matches his own.

No
No
Wrong
No Proof
Liar

I did post a few genuine messages at him before I got bored of being ignored and resorted to that style again. I think.

 

[payne]

I did post a few genuine messages at him before I got bored of being ignored and resorted to that style again. I think.

It's fascinating that people like him exist. Proper sociopath

 

[nahwee]

I suspect I may be on ignore. Imagine a flat earth conspiracy nutjob actively avoiding facts when gifted to them on a platter. With gold sprinkles.

He will still be reading your posts. It’s a common response from him not to reply when he has painted himself into a corner.

 

[BigPete]

Still refusing to admit his own words?

 

[payne]

Still refusing to admit his own words?

what words, show me

 

[BigPete]

what words, show me

What is a word?
Define a word

 

[Nobby]

Unhindered words

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Still refusing to admit his own words?

I heard he'd refused to wear his shirt because he'd spilled gravity on it

 

[Hend79]

Imagine being even thicker than a mag.... oh wait

 

[legend7]

Its all gone very quiet.
I know he has his early morning rants but we need evidence of his superfluid experiments that he definitely has done ....

 

[Nobby]

Its all gone very quiet.
I know he has his early morning rants but we need evidence of his superfluid experiments that he definitely has done ....

His flat water evidence would do me tbh

 

[legend7]

His flat water evidence would do me tbh

He said he had superfluid experiments.
That's what I want to know about

 

[Nobby]

He said he had superfluid experiments.
That's what I want to know about

Yeah but we know that's bollox. His unhindered water should at least be something that can be replicated and challenged

 

[legend7]

Yeah but we know that's bollox. His unhindered water should at least be something that can be replicated and challenged

I can't believe I had an upturned bowl on a plate, full of water, with continents drawn on it.. just to prove what he said was nonsense

 

[What A Waster]

This is true to form. He denies everything and there are plenty of times in this thread I have both copied direct quote from himself and linked to them, and he denies that. When someone's level of denial is that they completely deny clear evidence of what they have just said (once was on the previous page) when right in front of their face for all to see, it shows why literally anything can be dismissed as no evidence. Probably thinks it is a conspiracy and one of the mods is part of this "higher controlling group", and has been instructed to edit his posts.

Lies

Lies. There is masses of evidence, covering many branches of science, all pointing to a massive meteor strike. You just deny it all.

Yes, an angle can be anything, you are just being obtuse about it and assuming it is a very tight 'skimming' angle. Why not one of the others, close to perpenducular to the surface?

I posted this earlier when I said "recorded by many amateurs". My meaning of that is that many amateurs have witnessed it and have records. I literally said this in the post you are quoting, what is wrong with you? The moon is a popular study and imaging target for amateur astronomers. Go to any astronomy forum and there are regular posts where someone has been imaging away and captured a strike. These are sometimes followed up with images of new craters. I have not personally seen one, but did image one area, a week before someone recorded a strike and a small new crater, which I then went back and looked at. "only big wigs that tell us", shows your level of paranoia.

So you fully admit you have never spent time at a telescope studying the moon, yet you claim no new craters appear. How do you know this? This is a classic example, you assume no new craters appear then cling to it as a desperate truth, yet you base this on nothing but an assumption you made without any evidence. This is what you do with everything and hence live in a paranoid fantasy land. Any in answer to the second part, yes I spend many hours outside doing astronomy (as I have posted many times before), studying craters and other features on the moon, imaging many of them.

No 8 inches squared is from a flat earth fantasy trying to disprove the globe. I have posted many times that this rule is wrong, and even produced a short paper doing a mathematical analysis of why it is wrong, so please don't credit your moronic chantings to me.

You still fail to provide any evidence of the experiments you have done that you say prove all your drivel. This is because you have lied about them, if not then why do you not share this ground breaking research?

There are times I've thought, "oh for a decent session face to face with a wipe board and some patient physicists, perhaps we could explain something to him", but jesus, this is a whole new level of stupidity.

Show me
here
Show me
here
Show me
here, are you stupid
Show me

Paranoid denial beyond all hope

I was wondering if there were web services where you can host odd pages of text. I can stick any image in imgBB and put any video on YouTube, but not sure where I can knock up a document, other than wikipedia who would instantly throw it away as a waste of space. I was thinking a couple of days ago of drawing up a conspiracy theorist play book. If you look through the thread there are around 7 standard responses along the lines of:
1 - Flat denial, witnessed by the "show me a quote" nonsense today. "There is no evidence" being the most common phrase
2 - Do some homework - "Prove it to me", "Explain in your own words"
3 - Dismiss because it is handed on a plate - Somehow an accumulation of human knowledge is invalid, even if can be proven.
4 - Ignore - Just don't reply to those bits when backed into a corner
5 - Attack. Stop trying to explain or convince about your shaky argument and just attack the accepted norm, thus turning the conversation
6 - Deflect. Similar to attack, but miss the point and change the subject. E.g. when talking about the size of the moon, reply "But that doesn't show the distance to the so called stars",
7 - Play dumb - Ask the same question again while quoting the person who gives the answer in your quote

There are more than 7, but because these things repeat on a loop, I was thinking it is useful to have a common frame of reference "Ah, you have gone for CT response 5, well....."

Excellent post. All of it. I'd like it a dozen times if I could.

I can't believe I had an upturned bowl on a plate, full of water, with continents drawn on it.. just to prove what he said was nonsense

Brazil is still under water?

 

[fyl2u]

He said he had superfluid experiments.
That's what I want to know about

He lies on his back and pisses into the air.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Ok, I've told you what to do to demonstrate that Earth is moving, but you're not even going to try.
What have you got that proves it doesn't?

I've told you many times what proves it doesn't.

By your logic other people doing experiments doesn't count.

Anyone doing experiments can certainly count if it has a potential or a real end product or offers more to a theoretical concept and so on.

But you say you have done many experiments yourself so:

Please share details of one of those experiments in sufficient detail to allow others to replicate it. Please also share your conclusions to see if they can be agreed.

The globe indoctrination is so strong that any random offering of anything against it will be pointless to those people.

It's all about those who can and want to think outside of the box they're in. Most do not for various reasons.
So, basically, it comes down to each individual to take what they want from what I say. If that's nothing then that's fine.

To make it easier you can pick any one of your many experiments (but preferably one relating to the issue of the shape of the world, since that is what is being discussed)

Water level.
You didn't see that one coming, did you?

I can confidently say that you've done absolutely NOTHING that proves this. Not one thing.

And you are absolutely welcome to that and I'm absolutely fine with it.

You wont do anything that proves it either way because you're not looking for proof or the truth.

And you're also welcome to that thought.

You have a theory full of holes, with zero proof and nothing to support it other than your absolute conviction that the mainstream theory is a lie. You have no proof of that either.

And once again you're absolutely entitled to those thoughts and I'm fine with whatever you decide.