• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

chelt_mackem said:
I haven't been to either, and obviously never will since they don't exist. But what about South America? I wonder where I actually went when I thought I was in Brazil, and why I could see the so-called southern constellations exactly as they would appear on the globe model.
Click to expand...
It was Brazil but it's not where they show you on a map. Maps are all fabricated. There's basically nothing that isn't designed to fool into flat earth. Toothpicks on oranges are in on it even
 
Last edited:

Kevj said:
Build a bridge you say?

Science tells the world the foundations need to be made from concrete. I’ve done my own experiments and conclude my bridge foundations will be made of cheese. My cheese is the real cheese and better than your so called concrete.
Click to expand...
Should use gold there is an abundance of it.
 
chelt_mackem said:
I haven't been to either, and obviously never will since they don't exist. But what about South America? I wonder where I actually went when I thought I was in Brazil, and why I could see the so-called southern constellations exactly as they would appear on the globe model.
Click to expand...
it's just the same everywhere as there's no south
 
chelt_mackem said:
I haven't been to either, and obviously never will since they don't exist. But what about South America? I wonder where I actually went when I thought I was in Brazil, and why I could see the so-called southern constellations exactly as they would appear on the globe model.
Click to expand...
Don't forget with his bowl model, South America is either underwater or the seas are about 3000 miles deep....
 
Pancho said:
Simply stunning.

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
Great photos 👍 I just don't understand why they scrapped all the technology and can't go back, some say it was to stop the Russians getting their hands on the tech, although to be fair I did see something a few months back that they are working on the technology for a proposed man made landing sometime down the line. Who knows.
 
SAFCOldie said:
Great photos 👍 I just don't understand why they scrapped all the technology and can't go back, some say it was to stop the Russians getting their hands on the tech, although to be fair I did see something a few months back that they are working on the technology for a proposed man made landing sometime down the line. Who knows.
Click to expand...
You must be logged on to see external links
 
SAFCOldie said:
:lol: :lol: Righto. I couldn't really give a toss just more bothered why they scrapped the technology and took this much time.
Click to expand...
NASA's budget back in the peaked at something like 5% of the total national budget and employed up to 500k people directly and indirectly.

When the general public seemingly got bored after the successful Apollo missions the funding was cut drastically.

Currently I think it's only about 0.5% of the federal budget which hasn't been enough to replace the Saturn 5 technology.
 
Pancho said:
NASA's budget back in the peaked at something like 5% of the total national budget and employed up to 500k people directly and indirectly.

When the general public seemingly got bored after the successful Apollo missions the funding was cut drastically.

Currently I think it's only about 0.5% of the federal budget which hasn't been enough to replace the Saturn 5 technology.
Click to expand...
That's good info.
 
DaveH said:
Earlier in the solar system, there was a lot more meteors active. Gradually they have been pulled into planets, but google "late heavy bombardment".
Click to expand...
They're all good stories for those who wish to go along with them but that's all they are. Nobody is in possession of facts.
DaveH said:
Why would meteors not strike the surface of the moon that is facing us? The earth is not like a massive shield to it. It has a diameter of 12,742km at a distance of 384,400 km. Imagine having an umbrella on a really long pole, many km long, holding it above your head and wondering why you get wet when it rains. Pretty much the same. I'm assuming you believe in rain and umbrellas here and that we are talking the same thing, and you have not just decided that Dachshunds need a new name so you call them umbrellas. Under no circumstances should a Dachshund be put on a long pole and held above your head.
Click to expand...
As I said earlier, Earth should be a cratered mess if the moon is what we are told, a meteor-cratered rock.
Not to mention the craters of the moon would not look like we see if angled so-called space rock came into it.
Remember we wouldn't be talking about lobbing a rock onto the beach we would be talking about angling a rock throw in a straight trajectory that would not leave a perfectly circular crater. It would leave a skim and then a pushed-up mound to one part, like digging an angled tunnel in a small hill.

DaveH said:
There are many meteor impact craters on the earth. Some in open rocky places perfectly visible, some are in basins now overgrown but the distinctive shape is still visible. Google "meteor craters on earth". We still get hit with meteors, many are burnt up pretty small, others are larger. Don't you remember
You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
It's debatable as to what they are but they are few anyway and if we're told the moon has been peppered with rocks then you'd expect Earth to be peppered, not just a few random indentations.
DaveH said:
The moon is still regularly hit with meteors, astronomers imaging the moon regularly capture impacts, google "meteor hitting moon". Photos and videos
Click to expand...
As we're told but these ones will be too minuscule to see...right?
It's so convenient.
Scare people about meteors on course for Earth and then make out they hit all kinds of planets but only the storytellers can observe this.
I love the stories but to me they're fictional.
DaveH said:
This information is there with very little effort to find it. If you really wanted to know the truth you would not be clinging to the works of your late 1800s flat earth bible.
Click to expand...
I don't cling to any flat Earth bible.
As for wanting to know the truth. I won't get it from mainstream libraries in terms of what I'm arguing against but I will get more stories trying to coax me into a belief in fiction.
DaveH said:
That picture is invalid because it disproves what he is saying.
Click to expand...
It's invalid anyway.
I provided one when it was handed out the first time to show them in a straight and level line. I'm sure you remember.
DaveH said:
The picture across the lake where in certain atmospheric conditions is valid as 100% proof you can see miles across oceans, because it "proves" what he is saying. Something there is no evidence of being repeated elsewhere, but yeah, proof.
Click to expand...
To be fair, only one place is required, because it only needs one in the limelight to disprove a curvature over the ocean.
But the panic crew immediately goes to it's a mirage, a mirage.
There will always be some kind of answer to anything that goes against the global stories but they do get more and more desperate. IMO.
DaveH said:
Why do you refuse to share the method and results of your experiments, only the gained conclusions?
Click to expand...
To who? You?
DaveH said:
The best you have ever done concern a spirit level in a bath, which as we have said many times, is flawed.
Click to expand...
Ok.
DaveH said:
When asked to calculate the curve using your rule (which is wrong) over the length of a spirit level to find how much you would expect the curve to be, you refuse.
Click to expand...
Of course, it's wrong, for you, because you go with the other offer of change and you're welcome to it but the reality is there in anyone's face if they choose to take the time out to see past the global fiction.IMO.
DaveH said:
You claim to have done a lot with evacuation chambers, but will not even give the type and model of what you have obtained, let alone what you did with them.
Click to expand...
What I've done anyone can do with a simple evacuation chamber. A simple bell jar will suffice with a simple pump.
DaveH said:
You claimed at one point to have created plasma and superfluids, but refused to expand on that further.
Click to expand...
No. You can make up anything you want to and I'm fine with it but it does not make what you say become a truth. But you carry on.
DaveH said:
There were some other things where you needed some seriously expensive and specialist lab equipment, way beyond any of the things that I have seen at my work and their multi-million pound budgets.
Click to expand...
Such as?
DaveH said:
I don't believe you have done any experiments. You are a liar.
Click to expand...
And you're absolutely welcome to that.
Hend79 said:
Again, that is because there are people on this (globe) Earth who are far more intelligent than people on this thread and its their job to study the cosmos and other things to do with astrophysics.
Click to expand...
Nothing wrong with studying the sky and what is reflected from it.
I bet it's amazing what those remote telescopes show compared to what our telescopes show.

Hend79 said:
There are also people on this thread who have shown you why we live on a globe
Click to expand...
Nobody has shown me anything of the sort. They've told me I do and offered to regurgitate the storyline. I'm sure you understand I can't accept that for obvious reasons when it's clear to see we do not live on a spinning globe.
Hend79 said:
, you have been proven wrong countless times.
Click to expand...
Not once have I been proven wrong.
Hend79 said:
. You know absolutely nothing.
Click to expand...
In your mind and you're welcome to it.
Hend79 said:
Please dont pass on your intelligence levels or humankind will be doomed.
Click to expand...
Humankind is doomed anyway, without my help.
 
Last edited:
And so we are back to multiple quotes to fragment the discussion into individual sentences, to enable our flat earth friend to avoid addressing any actual points.

Bottom line is you have a belief system more akin to a religion, which is fine. But that is all it is. Be happy, accept that but don't be surprised when you are criticised for failing to recognise it for what it is and promoting it as an evidence based reality
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top