• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


payne said:
What's on offer and what's hidden?
Click to expand...
Tat can only be guessed at this point.
payne said:
Do they need us to believe it's a ball so we don't look for the massive projector beyond the ice wall?
Click to expand...
Or to believe there's nothing more to the ball.
payne said:
What would it have to be for basically every discipline of science and mathematics to have been faked forever.
Click to expand...
That depends on what you think is being faked.
What does fake mean in terms of science?
What if the science is simply manipulated to get the same end product?

Like nuclear as a starter. Maybe it's not fission of a metal pellet and such. Maybe it's something else that is clean. abundant and costless to us.
That's just for starters.

You do not need to answer any of this just accept it as my guess and throw it aside.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
It's there. It's down to you to put the pieces together. And if you don't see anything then just go with whatever you wish to think.

Take what I say any way you wish and I'm ok with it.
Click to expand...

LAUGHABLY IDIOTIC.
Nukehasslefan said:
One person thought stupid is another person's seen genius. It's all about opinions.

I know what the argument is which was the reason I used the orange.
The story is fine. the reality is not, in my opinion.
You're just using another version of the same story.
Click to expand...

SPOKEN LIKE SOMEONE TRULY STUPID.
IDIOCY.
IDIOCY.
IDIOCY.
 
legend7 said:
They have found abundant gold and crystals, strange why they are rare and precious then.
Click to expand...
What would happen if you were told it's abundant?
How do you control the people?
legend7 said:
So on your last point yes, how do you know this?
And to clarify you have zero actual evidence of any of these rivers of gold just thoughts in an empty head?
Click to expand...
Aye, you think that and then you won't need to keep telling me. But if you feel you want to keep telling me then I'm ok with it.
 
its not fair for the globe believers to ask us flatties why they would lie , how do we know , were not the ones behind the deception

if im walking the dog one morning and discover a dead body in the hedgerow , does that mean i know how the person died?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I'll be cryptic.
Central core, veins, and liquids to a living cell.
Click to expand...

Literally nothing that you have any evidence of whatsoever.
Nukehasslefan said:
If you were stood in-between a 50-stone person much taller than you and obviously wider and someone directly behind that 50-stone person was throwing rocks at you and considering we go by your space being the vacuum, then how does the rock thrower manage to hit your body facing the 50 stone person?

Would the 50-stone person take the brunt of the hit with the rest going past and missing you?

Shouldn't Earth's backside be like the moon in this case and should the moon's face be showing those craters?
Click to expand...

The 50 stone person is 20 miles in front of you and the rocks are being thrown from all directions, you absolute cretin.
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
Tat can only be guessed at this point.

Or to believe there's nothing more to the ball.

That depends on what you think is being faked.
What does fake mean in terms of science?
What if the science is simply manipulated to get the same end product?

Like nuclear as a starter. Maybe it's not fission of a metal pellet and such. Maybe it's something else that is clean. abundant and costless to us.
That's just for starters.

You do not need to answer any of this just accept it as my guess and throw it aside.
Click to expand...

When will be be able to more than guess? If you say it's impossible to reach projection central then we will never know
parm said:
its not fair for the globe believers to ask us flatties why they would lie , how do we know , were not the ones behind the deception

if im walking the dog one morning and discover a dead body in the hedgerow , does that mean i know how the person died?
Click to expand...
I wonder how murderers are convicted when nobody saw them do it.
 
Last edited:
What A Waster said:
If me and you were having a snow ball fight and you were stood 1 metre behind a one metre high wall then crouched down i wouldn't be able to hit you. But if i went 40ft up on a cherry picker with a bucket full of snowballs I'd have a good angle to hit easily.

The moon is 240k km away from earth. There's plenty of space to get hit by a meteor. You're only imagining the meteors travelling in one direction
Click to expand...
One direction is all that's required when we are shown one face or the moon and one only which is 4 times smaller than earth as we're told, which is also shielding that face as we're told.
Of course, you can use any angle coming in past the Earth to the moon but you hit the moon at an angle and so you offer up a skim to a stop over distance on your moon rather than a direct hit to create a crater.

Doesn't work and for good reason because the moon is a fictional rock and the Earth is a fictional spinning ball and space does not exist as we are told about it. IMO.
 
Some will find interesting stuff here
You must be logged on to see external links

some will not, such as....
Nukehasslefan said:
One direction is all that's required when we are shown one face or the moon and one only which is 4 times smaller than earth as we're told, which is also shielding that face as we're told.
Of course, you can use any angle coming in past the Earth to the moon but you hit the moon at an angle and so you offer up a skim to a stop over distance on your moon rather than a direct hit to create a crater.

Doesn't work and for good reason because the moon is a fictional rock and the Earth is a fictional spinning ball and space does not exist as we are told about it. IMO.
Click to expand...
The only reason it doesn't work is in your own head.
If you believed in gravity you'd be closer to understanding but there you go.
 
Last edited:
Nobby said:
You have been asked numerous times to provide your evidence of flat water and have refused, failed to or deflected every time
Click to expand...
I've provided plenty. What I haven't provided is what you want which is what cannot be provided any more than you can provide any reality to the spinning globe model to adhere to.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
No need to rely on anyone but my own research and small but simple experiments and piecingthe theoretical jigsaw, which I do.
Whether that sits well with you or you think it's all absolute utter balderdash, is of no concern to me but I will happily debate with you.

I read nearly all. The issue for some is when I don't conform to the reply which is not my issue.

It demonstrates another story of many of what's deemed to be a global spinning Earth. It does not demonstrate a truth from your perspective, only adherence to the story and a belief that it is factual enough for you to relay as if it was a fact.
Click to expand...

I just did an experiment. I just taped a spirit level to the back of the the neighbour's dog and watched it run away. It looked like it stayed level regardless of which way the dog was facing, so I can only conclude from this that there's a dog operating the projector at the centre of the north pole.

It's a St. Bernard, which is how I know it's snowing near the projector.
 
payne said:
When will be be able to more than guess? If you say it's impossible to reach projection central then we will never know
Click to expand...
We may be able to reach many areas that offer a potential reality. How would we get there?
We're tagged and offered pathways to select areas.

What's at supposed Antarctica that warrants so much work by select people?


 
Nukehasslefan said:
To be fair water kills the spinning globe stone dead but it's boring to keep saying it.
Click to expand...

Except it doesn't, because you've never done an experiment to see whether water is flat and the proposed experiments you've put forward would produce the same result regardless of whether water was flat or curved, so they wouldn't even count as evidence for either theory if you actually HAD done the experiments.

Nukehasslefan said:
It comes down to whoever wants to actually see past the global ruse and look at alternates.
Click to expand...

IDIOCY.
Nukehasslefan said:
I've read many things from Rowbotham to the global side.
Click to expand...

He finally admits he's read Rowbotham.

There we have it folks, his whole belief system came from a 200-year-old book written by a scientifically and mathematically illiterate conman.
 
Last edited:
The Snockerty Friddle said:
Some will find interesting stuff here
You must be logged on to see external links

some will not, such as....

The only reason it doesn't work is in your own head.
If you believed in gravity you'd be closer to understanding but there you go.
Click to expand...
Why should I believe in something that nobody understands?
I believe in atmospheric pressure and central energy which creates everything we do to exist as well as everything else existing, including this cell we live inside of. That's my opinion which can be laughed at and ridiculed whilst people tout gravity as something which is no more than a story that offers nothing factual.

So as much as I understand people looking at my thoughts as a joke I see the global Earth and gravity, space stories as equal in the joke stakes, so I have no issues with any of it.
Nobby said:
No you haven't provided any evidence that can be replicated
Click to expand...
And you're welcome to go with that and stick rigidly to it. You are free to keep telling me this but you'll get the same answer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top