Put a flat earthier into space

[Pancho]

It's a simple drop per mile over a horizontal line to the vertical back to the ball/globe, so where does this parabola come into it, and how does that supposedly work on this ball?

That's just word salad.

I know you're simply parroting an incorrectly applied formula without a scintilla of mathematical understanding,* because it's only ever found being similarly misapplied on every single gormless flat earth site.

You parrot it because you're either mathematically illiterate or disingenuous or possibly both.

I can let you have the correct formula if you wish.

And how are you getting on researching those pesky flight plans?

*for transparency I must point out that I've had help here from a proper and extremely well qualified mathematician.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Logon or register to see this image

Already an alternate of this on this thread. Look it up.

 

[legend7]

It's there. It's down to you to put the pieces together. And if you don't see anything then just go with whatever you wish to think.

Take what I say any way you wish and I'm ok with it.

What's there to suggest rivers of silver and gold at the north Pole, point me in the right direction at least if you don't want to share your research.

 

[payne]

One person thought stupid is another person's seen genius. It's all about opinions.

I know what the argument is which was the reason I used the orange.
The story is fine. the reality is not, in my opinion.
You're just using another version of the same story.

It's really not

 

[chelt_mackem]

One person thought stupid is another person's seen genius. It's all about opinions.

I know what the argument is which was the reason I used the orange.
The story is fine. the reality is not, in my opinion.
You're just using another version of the same story.

It's not just opinion though is it, take the Humber Bridge as an example, you could measure the difference in distance between the supports at river level, road level and at the very top.

The orange experiment is just a small scale way of illustrating it.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Even with the almost 400,000km gap?

So you're using the existance of craters to support your nonsense but then claim they dont exist anyway?

Regardless.
If the moon faces Earth then we become the barrier to meteors having a direct hit to that face. But we see what we're told are rock craters.
If supposed meteors came in angled then you would expect much more than just a simple crater, you'd expect a lead-up along the moon at an incoming angle.

I'm arguing the existence of rock craters on the supposed rocky moon.
I never denied craters, just the makeup of how they appear.

 

[Nobby]

Let's put it this way. It's an argument that none of us will ever solve. It's one side saying one thing against another and neither has any proof

That is where you are wrong

There is direct observation evidence of the global earth.

The fact the you choose to ignore that evidence does not invalidate it, or just as importantly add any weight to your beliefs

 

[Nukehasslefan]

That's just word salad.

I know you're simply parroting an incorrectly applied formula without a scintilla of mathematical understanding,* because it's only ever found being similarly misapplied on every single gormless flat earth site.

You parrot it because you're either mathematically illiterate or disingenuous or possibly both.

I can let you have the correct formula if you wish.

And how are you getting on researching those pesky flight plans?

*for transparency I must point out that I've had help here from a proper and extremely well qualified mathematician.

All people have help at some point for many things.
The issue is in which person believes their help constitutes their own fact or whether they can admit they don;t have the facts but have a reliance on a belief they are told the facts and also believe they're qualified to pass that on.

 

[payne]

Regardless.
If the moon faces Earth then we become the barrier to meteors having a direct hit to that face. But we see what we're told are rock craters.
If supposed meteors came in angled then you would expect much more than just a simple crater, you'd expect a lead-up along the moon at an incoming angle.

I'm arguing the existence of rock craters on the supposed rocky moon.
I never denied craters, just the makeup of how they appear.

Special

 

[Nukehasslefan]

What's there to suggest rivers of silver and gold at the north Pole, point me in the right direction at least if you don't want to share your research.

I'll be cryptic.
Central core, veins, and liquids to a living cell.

 

[legend7]

I'll be cryptic.
Central core, veins, and liquids to a living cell.

Why don't you just point me directly to something?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

It's not just opinion though is it, take the Humber Bridge as an example, you could measure the difference in distance between the supports at river level, road level and at the very top.

The orange experiment is just a small scale way of illustrating it.

Have you measured it?

 

[What A Waster]

Already an alternate of this on this thread. Look it up.

How would i possibly be able to search for that? If you know what you're on about provide the link

 

[Nukehasslefan]

That is where you are wrong

There is direct observation evidence of the global earth.

The fact the you choose to ignore that evidence does not invalidate it, or just as importantly add any weight to your beliefs

No.
There is direct observation of what people are told is a global Earth, nothing more than that.

If you think I'm wrong (which obviously you do) then offer me something from you and only you that tells you you live on a spinning global Earth.

Why don't you just point me directly to something?

If you're interested then pick at it and see where it gets you. If not then disregard it and save yourself any frustration it might create.

How would i possibly be able to search for that? If you know what you're on about provide the link

Someone may help you.

 

[Kevj]

Regardless.
If the moon faces Earth then we become the barrier to meteors having a direct hit to that face. But we see what we're told are rock craters.
If supposed meteors came in angled then you would expect much more than just a simple crater, you'd expect a lead-up along the moon at an incoming angle.

I'm arguing the existence of rock craters on the supposed rocky moon.
I never denied craters, just the makeup of how they appear.

There’s nearly 240k miles between the moon and the earth. On a 2D plane only, it represents around 0.55% of a barrier at that distance. I’ve not taken into account any other rotational planes of which there are infinite where a meteor could originate from.

 

[fyl2u]

Why would anything be noticeable different other than distortion we do see from time to time?
We see little with the naked eye.
The dome change is entirely dependent on the passing of the movement of the energy (sun) over and around it.
It not only creates pressure differences it also creates gas build-up to the ice to water below and to gas and ice back to gas at the dome.

I explained all this to you.

Yes. I want to know how they managed to bypass Earth and how Earth isn't peppered to death by the very same craters seeing how they would've needed to get past in order to hit this supposed moon rock ball.
Any ideas?

Remember we're always seeing the same face.
And also why all of a sudden is it not peppered anymore?

I obviously believe I know the answer to this but I'm wondering what the explanation for it all is.

Maybe. It comes down to what each individual wants to go with.

 

[chelt_mackem]

Have you measured it?

No I haven't. If I had, and posted the measurements, would you even believe them?

They're freely available anyway, but you'll dismiss them as untrue if I look them up.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

offer me something from you and only you that tells you you live on a spinning global Earth.

Again, this only becomes necessary if you choose to follow the nonsense originally put forward by your snake oil salesman who came up with all this shite over a hundred years ago. There is no valid reason for insisting on personal experience here when all of this has been studied, tested, peer reviewed repeatedly for longer than something really long, like this thread.

 

[Nobby]

No.
There is direct observation of what people are told is a global Earth, nothing more than that.

If you think I'm wrong (which obviously you do) then offer me something from you and only you that tells you you live on a spinning global Earth.

Again your failure to accept proof does not invalidate it or give any credence to your argument.

The onus is on you to discredit with evidence the proof your are trying to say is invalid

 

[Nukehasslefan]

There’s nearly 240k miles between the moon and the earth. On a 2D plane only, it represents around 0.55% of a barrier at that distance. I’ve not taken into account any other rotational planes of which there are infinite where a meteor could originate from.

If you were stood in-between a 50-stone person much taller than you and obviously wider and someone directly behind that 50-stone person was throwing rocks at you and considering we go by your space being the vacuum, then how does the rock thrower manage to hit your body facing the 50 stone person?

Would the 50-stone person take the brunt of the hit with the rest going past and missing you?

Shouldn't Earth's backside be like the moon in this case and should the moon's face be showing those craters?