Put a flat earthier into space

[legend7]

Imagine being a grown-up and engaging with someone you think is doing it.
I suggest you and anyone else who has the same mindset as you to fully ignore me. It's easy to do so why don't you do it?

Same as we all watch stupid videos of people walking into things or falling off things I guess.
It's entertaining.
The fact you refuse to share any "research" means nobody can take you seriously tbf.
Plus other people on here post some very interesting stuff in reply to your ramblings too which is worth a read.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Hardly surprising with meaningless lines like -
"Seeing beyond the curve would offer you a pinpoint sky and no horizon at the pinpoint."
And the repeated denial of all that's been offered up and over and around for hundreds of pages and whatnot.

Pinpoint takes out field of view argument.

It's not an opinion, it's an unarguable fact. Your assertion of building plumb pillars to support the bridge actually prove the curvature, you can even illustrate this for yourself by sticking cocktail sticks into an orange, making sure they're all plumb (or on the normal to bring the mathematics back into it) and seeing whether the tops are father apart than the bottoms.

You're arguing from an orange point of view with cocktail sticks and that argument stands up to the scrutiny of bridges built on that orange.
However, you're using it as your Earth yardstick and you have no facts about Earth supposedly being a globe.

 

[payne]

It's nuts how someone in 2022 can be so stupid

 

[DPTT]

They build bridges using calculations for the terrain and climate, not for any global curvature.

You must be logged on to see external links

So is this incorrect or just a complete lie

 

[payne]

Pinpoint takes out field of view argument.

You're arguing from an orange point of view with cocktail sticks and that argument stands up to the scrutiny of bridges built on that orange.
However, you're using it as your Earth yardstick and you have no facts about Earth supposedly being a globe.

classic stuff.

the mantra of the conspiracy theorist, just repeat over and over

 

[Nukehasslefan]

You haven't explained anything fella, in fact you haven't explained anything in truth since this thread began, you have shared some wild and ludicrous ideas for sure, like the rivers of gold and silver at the so called North Pole for one, but you haven't shared any research or evidence to back this up, what makes you so sure there are rivers of gold and silver there?

Putting the jigsaw together.

I could just as easily say at the top of Mount Everest is a tortoise made of marshmallow and wasp spunk that breathes candy floss and bursts into flames every 27 minutes, it doesn't mean its true (its not btw before you send a long dialogue trying to disprove it)

To be fair we've almost been told that since learning age to the present day in regards to Earth shape and space.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Pinpoint takes out field of view argument.

For no reason whatsoever.
We do have a field of view. We can move eyes and bend neck.
The amount of movement required of either is incredibly small because of the field of view and the sheer scale of what they're looking at.

Keep on guessing but also feel free to stick rigidly to any employment or not you see fit to want to use. I'm fine with it.

Well we can safely rule out Bridge Builder for a start.

 

[What A Waster]

Absolutely because I absolutely know we do not live on a globe.
It's an easy thing to say about tops being farther apart than bottoms but nothing is taken into any account.
People mention cables and road spans wouldn't be able to be connected properly but tolerances will always need to be made for many issues, including expansion.

Let's put it this way. It's an argument that none of us will ever solve. It's one side saying one thing against another and neither has any proof. I mean let's face it if we're told water can curve then any story is possible.

I still see no real argument for it.

Get some blu tac, two cocktail sticks and a piece of string 30 cm long and a large mixing bowl.

Turn the mixing bowl over and put part of the blu tac on one part of the curved side. The western hemisphere if you will.
Push a cocktail stick into the blu tac so it's perpendicular to the surface of the bowl.

Use your 30cm string to measure from the base of the cocktail stick to the 'eastern hemisphere of the bowl'. Stick blu tac to the bowl. Insert stick into the blu tac perpendicular to the bowl.


Next measure 1 inch up a cocktail stick, and extend the string from one cocktail stick to the other, you'll see that the string is slightly short. Do the same from tip to tip and you'll see that it's shorter again.

This is a primary school experiment.

I know you struggle with scale, but obviously if this was scaled up to global size those sticks would be thousands of miles high and the string thousands of miles long.

But the experiment would work on a small scale or a large scale.

It's fairly easy to comprehend how/why curvature would need to be accounted for when building a large suspension bridge. The foot of the towers are marginally closer together than where the road deck would sit.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

You've just demonstrated once again, this time in long form, that you are both mathematically illiterate and that you repeat verbatim any nonsense you read on the internet.

If you had the vaguest clue about maths you would know that the 'formula' you keep repeating refers to a parabola and not a sphere.

Quoting 8 inches per mile squared in relation to earth's curvature is the province of youtube conmen and the idiots who follow them.

It's a simple drop per mile over a horizontal line to the vertical back to the ball/globe, so where does this parabola come into it, and how does that supposedly work on this ball?

 

[payne]

It's a simple drop per mile over a horizontal line to the vertical back to the ball/globe, so where does this parabola come into it, and how does that supposedly work on this ball?

OMG. WOW.

 

[legend7]

Putting the jigsaw together.

So show us some of the pieces that led you to think there are rivers of gold and silver at the north Pole, anything, any evidence as to why there would be rivers of silver and gold up there in that snowy expanse.

 

[What A Waster]

Logon or register to see this image

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Moon has no atmoshpere to deflect/burn up meteors, no oceans or forests to conceal impact craters. No weather to erode the impact craters


We may always see the same face, but that face is exposed to the whole of space with all its little rocks

If it faces us then it stands to reason that the Earth should've stopped any meteor hitting that face. They should hit Earth before they hit the moon.

The moon suddenly has no craters???

Not as we are told, no.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Logon or register to see this image

uaseful place that Pontchatrain

You must be logged on to see external links

 

[Nukehasslefan]

But if my ceiling was constantly moving and melting and bits falling off then the detail of the wings would change and move.
It wouldn't look uniform all of the time

Like moving your bat signal under a glass-bottomed swimming pool for s crude explanation.

How would you know this? What bridges have you designed? What structural codes are you familiar with? Which companies have you worked for doing this type of work?

I'll let you decide on whatever you think like you did earlier.

OMG. WOW.

Need any help?

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

If it faces us then it stands to reason that the Earth should've stopped any meteor hitting that face. They should hit Earth before they hit the moon.

Even with the almost 400,000km gap?

Not as we are told, no.

So you're using the existance of craters to support your nonsense but then claim they dont exist anyway?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

So show us some of the pieces that led you to think there are rivers of gold and silver at the north Pole, anything, any evidence as to why there would be rivers of silver and gold up there in that snowy expanse.

It's there. It's down to you to put the pieces together. And if you don't see anything then just go with whatever you wish to think.

Same as we all watch stupid videos of people walking into things or falling off things I guess.
It's entertaining.
The fact you refuse to share any "research" means nobody can take you seriously tbf.
Plus other people on here post some very interesting stuff in reply to your ramblings too which is worth a read.

Take what I say any way you wish and I'm ok with it.

 

[payne]

If it faces us then it stands to reason that the Earth should've stopped any meteor hitting that face. They should hit Earth before they hit the moon.

Not as we are told, no.

wtf. he says he uses simple logic

 

[Nukehasslefan]

It's nuts how someone in 2022 can be so stupid

One person thought stupid is another person's seen genius. It's all about opinions.

Get some blu tac, two cocktail sticks and a piece of string 30 cm long and a large mixing bowl.

Turn the mixing bowl over and put part of the blu tac on one part of the curved side. The western hemisphere if you will.
Push a cocktail stick into the blu tac so it's perpendicular to the surface of the bowl.

Use your 30cm string to measure from the base of the cocktail stick to the 'eastern hemisphere of the bowl'. Stick blu tac to the bowl. Insert stick into the blu tac perpendicular to the bowl.


Next measure 1 inch up a cocktail stick, and extend the string from one cocktail stick to the other, you'll see that the string is slightly short. Do the same from tip to tip and you'll see that it's shorter again.

This is a primary school experiment.

I know you struggle with scale, but obviously if this was scaled up to global size those sticks would be thousands of miles high and the string thousands of miles long.

But the experiment would work on a small scale or a large scale.

It's fairly easy to comprehend how/why curvature would need to be accounted for when building a large suspension bridge. The foot of the towers are marginally closer together than where the road deck would sit.

I know what the argument is which was the reason I used the orange.
The story is fine. the reality is not, in my opinion.
You're just using another version of the same story.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

One person thought stupid is another person's seen genius. It's all about opinions.

Except when facts are required, then the clown who thought he was a genius has to rebuild his bridge.