Put a flat earthier into space

[Kevj]

I've been shown zero.
I've been told to believe stories that the person offering relies on as factual without actually knowing them to be factual.
Being told this en masse does not constitute facts.

I agree, with you and many others if you can't see what I'm getting at, which is understandable considering we differ massively in our Earth mindset.

You have been shown everything you need to know. You’re either incapable or unwilling to understand it.

 

[fyl2u]

I've been shown zero.

Liar.

I've been told to believe stories that the person offering relies on as factual without actually knowing them to be factual.

Liar.

Being told this en masse does not constitute facts.

True.

I agree, with you and many others if you can't see what I'm getting at, which is understandable considering we differ massively in our Earth mindset.

Buffoon.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

I agree, with you and many others if you can't see what I'm getting at

Hardly surprising with meaningless lines like -
"Seeing beyond the curve would offer you a pinpoint sky and no horizon at the pinpoint."
And the repeated denial of all that's been offered up and over and around for hundreds of pages and whatnot.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Again demonstrating that you are mathematically illiterate.

Stop parroting stuff that you don't understand from stupid flat earth youtube videos made by con men and idiots.

Nothing to do with flat Earth videos.
The Earth is said to be over 24,000 miles in circumference and the drop from that perspective would be close to 8 inches per mile squared, meaning for each mile from a standpoint you will square the distance.

1 mile= 8 inches drop.
2 miles= 8 inches x 2 miles squared which is 8"x 2 =16"x2 = 32 inches.
3 miles= 8 inches x 3 miles squared which is 8"x3 =24" x3= 72 inches or 6 feet drop over 3 miles.

And so on and so on.

When you get to 50 miles your drop becomes 8 inches x 50 miles squared which becomes 8" x 50 =400" x 50 = 20,000 inches drop which equates to 20,000 divided by 12 inches to the foot equalling 1666.6 feet drop

This is not flat Earth stuff this comes from the story of the 24,000-mile plus so-called global circumference.

Take whatever you wish to take from this and call me whatever you feel is appropriate.

 

[chelt_mackem]

In your opinion and the opinion of many like you. I 100% disagree.

It's not an opinion, it's an unarguable fact. Your assertion of building plumb pillars to support the bridge actually prove the curvature, you can even illustrate this for yourself by sticking cocktail sticks into an orange, making sure they're all plumb (or on the normal to bring the mathematics back into it) and seeing whether the tops are father apart than the bottoms.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Aren’t you a painter and decorator? You haven’t been involved in the design, engineering or building of any bridges so you are far from qualified to comment.

Keep on guessing but also feel free to stick rigidly to any employment or not you see fit to want to use. I'm fine with it.

 

[payne]

Nothing to do with flat Earth videos.
The Earth is said to be over 24,000 miles in circumference and the drop from that perspective would be close to 8 inches per mile squared, meaning for each mile from a standpoint you will square the distance.

1 mile= 8 inches drop.
2 miles= 8 inches x 2 miles squared which is 8"x 2 =16"x2 = 32 inches.
3 miles= 8 inches x 3 miles squared which is 8"x3 =24" x3= 72 inches or 6 feet drop over 3 miles.

And so on and so on.

When you get to 50 miles your drop becomes 8 inches x 50 miles squared which becomes 8" x 50 =400" x 50 = 20,000 inches drop which equates to 20,000 divided by 12 inches to the foot equalling 1666.6 feet drop

This is not flat Earth stuff this comes from the story of the 24,000-mile plus so-called global circumference.

Take whatever you wish to take from this and call me whatever you feel is appropriate.

Totally ignored the chart made for you on this thread.......and no i'm going going to look it up for you.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Hold on numbskull, you said the dome is constantly melting, freezing, bits falling off that look like shooting stars/meteors, these happen every single day so surely it wouldn't take long to look different, even a year or so should be noticeably different if the "dome" is as flexible and fluid as you describe.

Why would anything be noticeable different other than distortion we do see from time to time?
We see little with the naked eye.
The dome change is entirely dependent on the passing of the movement of the energy (sun) over and around it.
It not only creates pressure differences it also creates gas build-up to the ice to water below and to gas and ice back to gas at the dome.

I explained all this to you.

Are you seriously asking what made craters on the moon?

Yes. I want to know how they managed to bypass Earth and how Earth isn't peppered to death by the very same craters seeing how they would've needed to get past in order to hit this supposed moon rock ball.
Any ideas?

Remember we're always seeing the same face.
And also why all of a sudden is it not peppered anymore?

I obviously believe I know the answer to this but I'm wondering what the explanation for it all is.

Call it rejecting everything that has been tested, proved and accepted and replacing it with made up shite that has no basis in reality. That'd be closer to the truth.

Maybe. It comes down to what each individual wants to go with.

 

[legend7]

Why would anything be noticeable different other than distortion we do see from time to time?
We see little with the naked eye.
The dome change is entirely dependent on the passing of the movement of the energy (sun) over and around it.
It not only creates pressure differences it also creates gas build-up to the ice to water below and to gas and ice back to gas at the dome.

I explained all this to you.

You haven't explained anything fella, in fact you haven't explained anything in truth since this thread began, you have shared some wild and ludicrous ideas for sure, like the rivers of gold and silver at the so called North Pole for one, but you haven't shared any research or evidence to back this up, what makes you so sure there are rivers of gold and silver there?
I could just as easily say at the top of Mount Everest is a tortoise made of marshmallow and wasp spunk that breathes candy floss and bursts into flames every 27 minutes, it doesn't mean its true (its not btw before you send a long dialogue trying to disprove it)

 

[Pancho]

Nothing to do with flat Earth videos.
The Earth is said to be over 24,000 miles in circumference and the drop from that perspective would be close to 8 inches per mile squared, meaning for each mile from a standpoint you will square the distance.

1 mile= 8 inches drop.
2 miles= 8 inches x 2 miles squared which is 8"x 2 =16"x2 = 32 inches.
3 miles= 8 inches x 3 miles squared which is 8"x3 =24" x3= 72 inches or 6 feet drop over 3 miles.

And so on and so on.

When you get to 50 miles your drop becomes 8 inches x 50 miles squared which becomes 8" x 50 =400" x 50 = 20,000 inches drop which equates to 20,000 divided by 12 inches to the foot equalling 1666.6 feet drop

This is not flat Earth stuff this comes from the story of the 24,000-mile plus so-called global circumference.

Take whatever you wish to take from this and call me whatever you feel is appropriate.

You've just demonstrated once again, this time in long form, that you are both mathematically illiterate and that you repeat verbatim any nonsense you read on the internet.

If you had the vaguest clue about maths you would know that the 'formula' you keep repeating refers to a parabola and not a sphere.

Quoting 8 inches per mile squared in relation to earth's curvature is the province of youtube conmen and the idiots who follow them.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Also I'm assuming this reflection moves around the dome as people in different timezones and countries see it at different times.

Yep.

But also spookily on this ever moving background the craters look the same in every single area the reflection bounces off too.

Yep because that reflection only changes to the view, as in upside down to some and whatnot.

It was hard enough to believe if it was static on a changing background but even less so if it moves around, which it must in your world

Just like moving a bat signal over and around your ceiling. You see the same bat but its orientation alters.

 

[payne]

loves projectors this lad, now the bat signal has came out

 

[Nukehasslefan]

The proof is that bridges work being built using these calculations, if the calculations were wrong they wouldn't work. That's your proof.

There's no proof.
Bridges work because the calculations are made over land or sea and are set plumb or off centre depending on what is required.
No Earth curvature has to be taken into consideration simply because there is no Earth curvature in terms of a global mindset.
Trust me I'll never change my mind on this.

You mentioned your years of research again, yet you won't share any of it to try and convince us, very strange wouldn't you say if you have lots of research evidence to back up your musings....

Let's be straight to the point.
No matter what I offer it's not going to change anything for the majority and I fully understand it.
You can debate what I say or you can call me whatever you think suits you. You get what you get and you do have a choice to overlook it in part or in full.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Yes. I want to know how they managed to bypass Earth and how Earth isn't peppered to death by the very same craters seeing how they would've needed to get past in order to hit this supposed moon rock ball.
Any ideas?

Moon has no atmoshpere to deflect/burn up meteors, no oceans or forests to conceal impact craters. No weather to erode the impact craters

Remember we're always seeing the same face.

We may always see the same face, but that face is exposed to the whole of space with all its little rocks

And also why all of a sudden is it not peppered anymore?

The moon suddenly has no craters???

I obviously believe I know the answer to this

Obviously

but I'm wondering what the explanation for it all is.

No you're not, that would imply that once told, you would absorb and consider any information offered.
We all know that's not going to happen.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

So they actually built the bridge using those calculations for a laugh then

They build bridges using calculations for the terrain and climate, not for any global curvature.

 

[legend7]

Just like moving a bat signal over and around your ceiling. You see the same bat but its orientation alters.

But if my ceiling was constantly moving and melting and bits falling off then the detail of the wings would change and move.
It wouldn't look uniform all of the time

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Maybe. It comes down to what each individual wants to go with.

Not in the real world. In yours perhaps, but no.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Imagine being prepared to make this much of a public arse of yourself in a bizarre attempt to wind strangers up online.

Imagine being a grown-up and engaging with someone you think is doing it.
I suggest you and anyone else who has the same mindset as you to fully ignore me. It's easy to do so why don't you do it?

 

[Kevj]

They build bridges using calculations for the terrain and climate, not for any global curvature.

How would you know this? What bridges have you designed? What structural codes are you familiar with? Which companies have you worked for doing this type of work?

Imagine being a grown-up and engaging with someone you think is doing it.
I suggest you and anyone else who has the same mindset as you to fully ignore me. It's easy to do so why don't you do it?

I’m not putting you on ignore! This is too much like fun.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

You have been shown everything you need to know. You’re either incapable or unwilling to understand it.

I've been shown nothing that you can verify against what you are arguing and for what I'm arguing against..