• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

Nukehasslefan said:
It means nothing of the sort. It means natural projection from the centre onto a dome.
Whatever is in that centre is projected as points of light or holographic, naturally.
All we've done as a species is to harness that through our own fabrications using a similar setup on a small scale.

Whatever people see through the naked eye or telescope is what's projected from the centre, in my honest opinion.
Most of what people see are simply points of light and most of what we're coaxed into being shown are colourful so-called planets and stars and whatnot.
Click to expand...
So on this natural dome the random natural lights are projected on to.
The dome which moves and breathes and melts and refreezes and bits fall off to look like meteors.
How come if we look at the moon day after day, month after month, year after year, the "craters" never move, never change shape, always look exactly the same, how can that be if the projection surface is constantly changing?
You are an absolute imbecile fella tbh, entertaining but an imbecile nonetheless.
 

So basically nobody has a clue why they supposedly take the Earth's curvature into account when building bridges.
Unless someone knows what they actually do.
 
So so sattelites in a geosynchrous orbit of the earth..they rotate the earth for coverage and to maintain their station... If the earth is flat why do they need to move?
 
Hep said:
Anywhere really, but France isn’t opposite our coast in the north east

You should easily see Denmark or Germany though
Click to expand...
You shouldn't be able to see anything from 50 miles due to Earth's curvature but apparently, we do yet when we do it's called a mirage. How appropriate.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
So basically nobody has a clue why they supposedly take the Earth's curvature into account when building bridges.
Unless someone knows what they actually do.
Click to expand...

No you dont, you have been told numerous times why including a few posts above this one but you ignore the answers and keep asking the same question. Look it up on google.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
You shouldn't be able to see anything from 50 miles due to Earth's curvature but apparently, we do yet when we do it's called a mirage. How appropriate.
Click to expand...
That’s great, nip down to the coast and grab a picture for us all, that’s all we need to end this discussion.
 
legend7 said:
So on this natural dome the random natural lights are projected on to.
The dome which moves and breathes and melts and refreezes and bits fall off to look like meteors.
How come if we look at the moon day after day, month after month, year after year, the "craters" never move, never change shape, always look exactly the same, how can that be if the projection surface is constantly changing?
Click to expand...
You always see movement in front of the moon projections. It's always moving about.

legend7 said:
You are an absolute imbecile fella tbh, entertaining but an imbecile nonetheless.
Click to expand...
Ok, whatever you say.
GingerNick said:
So so sattelites in a geosynchrous orbit of the earth..they rotate the earth for coverage and to maintain their station... If the earth is flat why do they need to move?
Click to expand...
They don't, there aren't any.
taipeisafc said:
No you dont, you have been told numerous times why including a few posts above this one but you ignore the answers and keep asking the same question. Look it up on google.
Click to expand...
I'm sure someone must be able to answer this yet nobody seems to know.
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
You always see movement in front of the moon projections. It's always moving about.


Ok, whatever you say.
Click to expand...
The craters look the same as they did 100 years ago, if the background is constantly changing this wouldn't happen, especially if bits melt and fall off.
I'm sure someone would notice and go "f*ck me a crater has just vanished or moved"
 
Nukehasslefan said:
So basically nobody has a clue why they supposedly take the Earth's curvature into account when building bridges.
Unless someone knows what they actually do.
Click to expand...
I think you are on a massive troll here so I'm out after this.

If the towers are set plumb then the distance between them, at the same height on each tower are different ... the higher up you go the further away the corresponding bit on the next tower is.

This is due to the curvature of the earth.

To build a "bridge" you need to connect towers to each other - whether that be the actual road or the suspension cables, etc. In order to plan the length of these objects you need to know that *due to the curvature of the earth* the towers are not parallel to each other vertically.

So, explicitly - that is why they take the curvature of the earth into account - because the towers don't exist in isolation - they are connected to each other.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
So basically nobody has a clue why they supposedly take the Earth's curvature into account when building bridges.
Unless someone knows what they actually do.
Click to expand...

It has been explained to you. You've refused to accept the explanation.

If the vertical pillars are exactly 100 metres apart at the bottom where they meet the ground and you're planning to build the road part of the bridge 10 metres above the ground, then because of the curvature of the earth, the road part will need to be a little bit longer than 100m per section or it won't reach the next pillar.
GingerNick said:
So so sattelites in a geosynchrous orbit of the earth..they rotate the earth for coverage and to maintain their station... If the earth is flat why do they need to move?
Click to expand...

Satellites don't exist marra.
 
legend7 said:
The craters look the same as they did 100 years ago, if the background is constantly changing this wouldn't happen, especially if bits melt and fall off.
I'm sure someone would notice and go "f*ck me a crater has just vanished or moved"
Click to expand...
What background?
Do you mean atmospheric distortion or the actual projected image from the centre?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
You always see movement in front of the moon projections. It's always moving about.


Ok, whatever you say.

They don't, there aren't any.

I'm sure someone must be able to answer this yet nobody seems to know.
Click to expand...

Everybody knows but you. You're ignoring the explanations and lying about them not being there.
 
legend7 said:
The dome that the "image" is being projected on to.
The ever changing, melting, freezing dome, yet somehow the image never changes decade to decade
Click to expand...
Why would the image change other than having atmospheric movement due to fluctuations over it? It's a projection that moves over and around.
GingerNick said:
But I can see sattelites moving with my own eyeball, I can actually see them
Click to expand...
What exactly do you see?
Are satellites lit up like beacons or do they stand out like what you see in the pictures?
Can you elaborate any further?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Why would the image change other than having atmospheric movement due to fluctuations over it? It's a projection that moves over and around.

What exactly do you see?
Are satellites lit up like beacons or do they stand out like what you see in the pictures?
Can you elaborate any further?
Click to expand...
Because according to you the background is ever moving, melting, freezing, chunks falling off, of course what you would see would change.
Why wouldn't the image reflection we see change is more pertinent?
 
legend7 said:
Because according to you the background is ever moving, melting, freezing, chunks falling off, of course what you would see would change.
Why wouldn't the image reflection we see change is more pertinent?
Click to expand...
The image does change. It ripples and whatnot.
Just like images change when we look through atmospheric changes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top