Phantom of mobs
Striker
I've heard that mindAshley incoming?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've heard that mindAshley incoming?
Ashley incoming?
I've heard that mind
I'd be all for it. Perhaps not as unlikely as people may think....actually come to think of it, wouldn't be against it. But the facts are that is extremely unlikely
It's almost as if the whole Keane business with it's associated ITK horseshite has taught people nothing. Where's that straw clutching .gif when you need it?So this thread is wanting attention based on what BOB said? A known RAOS. Yet this thread exists based on that...sad times
That can't be true.You must be logged on to see media items
That would be adding insult to injury if true.That can't be true.
Already come to light on the bad news thread.Apologies if this is being discussed elsewhere, please merge if so:
You must be logged on to see media items
It makes little difference. They owe money to themselves, therefore it reduces the value of the club they own. If it had gone in via Shares, it would increase the value of the club they own. It's all net neutral.That can't be true.
It’s got to be true as that how any business will work imo .Run it at a loss and any coin put in is a directors loanThat can't be true.
Likes a holiday does KLDIt couldnt have been today surely...KLD is out of the country.
Incredibly it would instantly raise the standards.
It’s got to be true as that how any business will work imo .Run it at a loss and any coin put in is a directors loan
What video?Are you saying kld will sell his shares
Who can blame him.
Having that weirdo breaking into the ground and videoing inside would have put any normal person off.
Anyway I'm sure the investment he has made will be sold and he will be relieved to be away from such weird and scary behaviour.
Still doesnt change the ownership though.
I completely agree with you in general. Using made up figures if a club is worth £10m, a director puts £1m in but its a loan so they'd get £1m back, then the value would still be £10m, making it neutral. That sort of makes sense (albeit I'm still confused, I don't pretend to be any sort of a finance expert).It makes little difference. They owe money to themselves, therefore it reduces the value of the club they own. If it had gone in via Shares, it would increase the value of the club they own. It's all net neutral.