Put a flat earthier into space

I think you've got all that sorted. Don't worry about me, I'm fine.

What works?
Explain what he said to you.
I think you've got all that sorted. Don't worry about me, I'm fine.

What works?
Explain what he said to you.
I think you've got all that sorted. Don't worry about me, I'm fine.

What works?
Explain what he said to you.
There's many more for you to ponder that can say anything you wish them to say.
Good luck.

Only your eyes can perceive what's took in by the camera.
I think you've got all that sorted. Don't worry about me, I'm fine.

What works?
Explain what he said to you.

Does it ever concern you that you haven't been able to convince a single person on this board of the validity of any of your musings. Some have specific relevant practical experience, that as far i can tell you don't, fibre optics or whatever. I would suggest that the consensus is that you are a tad unhinged.
 


Just googled there is actually a band!

Christian Rock :lol:

he's probably like them as it will go well with his faith in the flat earth bible
Does it ever concern you that you haven't been able to convince a single person on this board of the validity of any of your musings. Some have specific relevant practical experience, that as far i can tell you don't, fibre optics or whatever. I would suggest that the consensus is that you are a tad unhinged.
Everyone else is brainwashed, not him. He'll come out with it's easier to go with the mainstream narrative. He thinks every discipline is fake but he uses their terms/words to explain his made up world. Scientific terms which mean something completely different in the real word, he steals them and makes up new definitions. No one actually understand anything and just repeats stuff out of books which sould be in the fiction section of the library. He's mental.
 
Last edited:
Any dense mass will displace the atmosphere it is placed into by energy applied to it in order for it to overcome that atmosphere.


I'd be more than happy to explain further if people have genuine questions.
Does it bug you to keep having to call it an atmosphere? Do you not have your own name for it yet?

Genuine question.
Didn't they play at Waynestock with Mike Myers?
Supported The WaterLevellers IIRC
 
Last edited:
Does it ever concern you that you haven't been able to convince a single person on this board of the validity of any of your musings. Some have specific relevant practical experience, that as far i can tell you don't, fibre optics or whatever. I would suggest that the consensus is that you are a tad unhinged.

A tad unhindered.
 
Does it bug you to keep having to call it an atmosphere? Do you not have your own name for it yet?

Genuine question.

Supported The WaterLevellers IIRC
One of my thoughts. He uses all these terms that he doesn't believe in as concepts but then uses the word itself to describe his made up world.
Does it bug you to keep having to call it an atmosphere? Do you not have your own name for it yet?

Genuine question.

Supported The WaterLevellers IIRC
Oh yeah, it was a stacked roster.
 
Last edited:
Only your eyes can perceive what's took in by the camera.
But if 2 people look at the same image they will see the same photo. Long after the initial light source has been turned off. What do you think a printer does? Place light light generators that can mimic what light was available so our eyes can perceive what is there?

Also if light does not move, what was took in by the camera?
 
The energy that makes the light.
Just like shining a low strength torch and expecting someone to see it from a long distance. It will be compressed to near nothing.
Offer a stronger beam and you can hit a longer target at much greater strength.
Both are instant but one may not activate a component at distance but may easily do it over short distance.
We use standard units, the shorter distant ones across our campus and city have the same ‘strength’ as the short distant ones, so it is not down to the strength of light as you say.

It sounds like you made up a load of drivel trying to sound like you know what you are taking about but are just wrong.

Like I said everything the same except the distance.
 
We use standard units, the shorter distant ones across our campus and city have the same ‘strength’ as the short distant ones, so it is not down to the strength of light as you say.

It sounds like you made up a load of drivel trying to sound like you know what you are taking about but are just wrong.

Like I said everything the same except the distance.
Good job you didn't mention packets..

He'd start going on about the shapes of crisps.
 
But if 2 people look at the same image they will see the same photo. Long after the initial light source has been turned off. What do you think a printer does? Place light light generators that can mimic what light was available so our eyes can perceive what is there?

Also if light does not move, what was took in by the camera?
@Nukehasslefan ?
Saved me typing the same mate cheers.
Also @Nukehasslefan how come your theoretical atmosphere layers stay perfectly stacked the majority of the time yet someone breathing in a pressure controlled room causes all kinds of carnage.
 
Last edited:
Does it ever concern you that you haven't been able to convince a single person on this board of the validity of any of your musings.
Absolutely not.
I don;t care one iota what people think of what I say or whether they take anything or nothing from it.
It's entirely up to each individual as to what they find is worth thinking on or worth nothing.
None of it affects me.
I simply answer questions and argue my points against others. That's about it.
Some have specific relevant practical experience, that as far i can tell you don't, fibre optics or whatever.

You word it as if you actually know all of the people and accepting that they have the proofs for what they're arguing for.
I say you're merely attempting to back them up which is fair enough...but nobody's still offered any proof's for what is being argued. You included.
So forgive me if I hold fort and take on a no retreat, no surrender mantle until I see a time when there is something that forces me to wave a white flag.
Up to now the trumpeter is still trumpeting.
I would suggest that the consensus is that you are a tad unhinged.
That was well established way back into this topic by those who follow a belief system that as much ridicule is justified and becomes par for the course against anyone with alternative thought to the mainstream ideals.

You have my blessing to offer more if needed. Just saying.
Does it bug you to keep having to call it an atmosphere?
No. I class it as a dome hemisphere so I'm ok with it.

Do you not have your own name for it yet?
I could if you would prefer me to.
Is hemisphere ok or hemispheric or shall I just stick to atmosphere?
 
Last edited:
But if 2 people look at the same image they will see the same photo.
And?
Long after the initial light source has been turned off.
That's because it becomes a still. An image. Not a physical energy application.
What do you think a printer does?
Print?
Place light light generators that can mimic what light was available so our eyes can perceive what is there?
Elaborate.
Also if light does not move, what was took in by the camera?
It does move.
It's still instant.
 
.

No. I class it as a dome hemisphere so I'm ok with it.


I could if you would prefer me to.
Is hemisphere ok or hemispheric or shall I just stick to atmosphere?
You really need a dictionary.
You do know the "atmos" part comes from the Greek for vapour so that bit needs to stay.
Unless your imaginary world has none of that too and that's made up by so called scientists.
 
We use standard units, the shorter distant ones across our campus and city have the same ‘strength’ as the short distant ones, so it is not down to the strength of light as you say.
Nope.
It sounds like you made up a load of drivel trying to sound like you know what you are taking about but are just wrong.
By all means go with that. You do anyway so it's all good.
Like I said everything the same except the distance.
Nope.
 

Back
Top