Put a flat earthier into space

Are the people who did the pressure test also wrong, and therefore incompetent at their job?

Are the environmental sensors I'm using also wrong?

A force, with direction that knows which way is down.

Dave, they are in on the scam. Not sure how these individuals were recruited but someone knew that they would be needed for the cause.
 


Ok. So I'm a bit dim.

The reason I think it is pressure sealed is because we have just had an annual pressure test where they failed to detect pressure leakage.
Compressed air cylinders don't have pressure leakage.
Is your rook like a compressed air cylinder and you sit inside of it without any change in pressure?
What about the vents and what not?

The reason I think the pressure is identical floor to ceiling is because I have environmental sensors telling me this is the case.
I suppose you refuse to breathe during your spell inside this sealed container....right?
Refuse to move your dense mass?
The vents do nothing other than look like vents but are really just shut off and you manage to keep a perfect equalised environment in that room?
Are the people who did the pressure test also wrong, and therefore incompetent at their job?
Yes if you or they are advocating a perfect scenario of atmosphere in a room from floor to ceiling with absolutely no movement of it.
Are the environmental sensors I'm using also wrong?
Are they saying the room is exactly perfect harmony of atmosphere that offers no change whatsoever?

Your room can never offer you exact pressure from floor to ceiling.

The only thing that would ever offer you perfection would be a perfect sphere or a perfect cube, etc suspended in some magical equalised all round environment that offered zero change.
The thing with this is, it would not have to include you being it it, nor a simple ball or furniture or whatever.

This would only happen in fantasy. A story.

What you're describing, is room air chaos. Unless you want to turn off the vents and what not and take yourself out of the room along with anything in it that can expand and contract, which basically leaves you with a room of nothing and nothing to reference for any attempt to squash what I'm offering.

Which is atmospheric pressure being a reality and gravity being a fantasy along with a space vacuum and a spinning global Earth...etc.....etc.....etc.
 
Someone in an earlier post described his specific practical experience with fibre optic cables. He had effectively tested the given science of light and found it to be valid. He effectively tested your musings and concluded they were bollocks. So is he lying or just part of the totally implausible global Earth conspiracy?
A fibre optic cable allows reflection of light through it to a receiver. It's instant and the only delay to any operation from it is the mechanical effort from it by whatever machine uses that light to operate from.
The light itself has no speed.
 
A force, with direction that knows which way is down.
A dense mass pushing up against a stacked atmosphere causes that equal reaction back onto that dense mass which squeezes it back down to a foundation it came from by allowing it to overcome the resistance below.
Pretty simple and explains everything nicely.
Gravity does not.
 
Compressed air cylinders don't have pressure leakage.
Is your rook like a compressed air cylinder and you sit inside of it without any change in pressure?
What about the vents and what not?


I suppose you refuse to breathe during your spell inside this sealed container....right?
Refuse to move your dense mass?
The vents do nothing other than look like vents but are really just shut off and you manage to keep a perfect equalised environment in that room?

Yes if you or they are advocating a perfect scenario of atmosphere in a room from floor to ceiling with absolutely no movement of it.

Are they saying the room is exactly perfect harmony of atmosphere that offers no change whatsoever?

Your room can never offer you exact pressure from floor to ceiling.

The only thing that would ever offer you perfection would be a perfect sphere or a perfect cube, etc suspended in some magical equalised all round environment that offered zero change.
The thing with this is, it would not have to include you being it it, nor a simple ball or furniture or whatever.

This would only happen in fantasy. A story.

What you're describing, is room air chaos. Unless you want to turn off the vents and what not and take yourself out of the room along with anything in it that can expand and contract, which basically leaves you with a room of nothing and nothing to reference for any attempt to squash what I'm offering.

Which is atmospheric pressure being a reality and gravity being a fantasy along with a space vacuum and a spinning global Earth...etc.....etc.....etc.
So I'm wrong, the environmental sensors are wrong and the data centre engineers who we have a contract with to maintain the room are also wrong? But you are right? Is that what you are saying?
 
A fibre optic cable allows reflection of light through it to a receiver. It's instant and the only delay to any operation from it is the mechanical effort from it by whatever machine uses that light to operate from.
The light itself has no speed.
So why does this delay change over distance, when the transceivers at the ends of a long run and a short run are the same? I.e. the only thing different is the length of the fibre?
 
See with science it doesn't matter if you are right or wrong it's all about learning.

That's why he could never be one. He says we are all scientists yet he is trying his hardest not to be one.
 
A fibre optic cable allows reflection of light through it to a receiver. It's instant and the only delay to any operation from it is the mechanical effort from it by whatever machine uses that light to operate from.
The light itself has no speed.
You aren't answering the question. He (an expert in fibre optics I assume you aren't) says the given science works and your musing don't. Is he lying or part of the conspiracy?
 
See with science it doesn't matter if you are right or wrong it's all about learning.

That's why he could never be one. He says we are all scientists yet he is trying his hardest not to be one.
He thinks by simply doubting literally everything that qualifies him. He doesn't feel the slightest embarrassed that he says he knows better than everyone in every single field of science. He's a painter and decorator.
 
So why does this delay change over distance, when the transceivers at the ends of a long run and a short run are the same? I.e. the only thing different is the length of the fibre?
The energy that makes the light.
Just like shining a low strength torch and expecting someone to see it from a long distance. It will be compressed to near nothing.
Offer a stronger beam and you can hit a longer target at much greater strength.
Both are instant but one may not activate a component at distance but may easily do it over short distance.
 

Back
Top