Put a flat earthier into space



Nukehasslefan said:
Ground positioning stations.
Basically cell tower triangulation.



Nothing. They're catchers of direct signals coming from towers and relay stations.
Have you never wondered why people's dishes are rarely point up at the sky?
Have you ever wondered why you never have to alter your dish for decades?

Have you ever wondered why anyone would need to send a signal 23,000 miles into so called orbit with a suppose spinning globe to bounce back down to an area through a so called van Allen radiation belt and through and supposed vacuum and then to hit back at an atmosphere and through clouds and what not, to your little dish on your house that is largely almost horizontal on the wall and some with a small angle.

We're offered magic and most of us go with it. And why not?
As long as we get a signal it doesn't matter to most people where it comes from.

But it doesn't...at all. Not in the slightest.
You're saying it simply to back them up without knowing what you're backing up.
Click to expand...
Iv'e seen the astra foorptint and Astra 2D its at 28.5 degrees south, Ive also connected to various other satellites form hotbird tnd freesat, if you install a sat finder on your phone it will tell you where they are in the sky. Not the land.
 
taipeisafc said:
Utter drivel, so you think DaveH is lying then.
Click to expand...
I just answered that.
ned_werby said:
@Nukehasslefan - how deep are your layers of pressure?
Click to expand...
Can you elaborate a bit on this.
WillInSpain said:
Iv'e seen the astra foorptint and Astra 2D its at 28.5 degrees south, Ive also connected to various other satellites form hotbird tnd freesat, if you install a sat finder on your phone it will tell you where they are in the sky. Not the land.
Click to expand...
Then you go with what you think or what you think you know. You asked me a question and I gave you my answer. I don't expect you to follow it.
 
Last edited:
RollingStone said:
Do you ever consider the possibility that even a single aspect of what you propose is incorrect.
Click to expand...
Lot's of stuff I say may not be correct.
Lots of stuff you say may not be correct.
This is where we're at.
It all comes down to gaining the ability to offer proof.
If proof cannot be offered then circumstantial evidence generally is.
If people struggle for that then they can use ready to peruse references to what's being argued and use that as their battering ram of truth but should also be under no illusions about their offering of a truth based on that is only an offering of appeal to that authority they trust in.
This also means that any alternative to what they believe is as valid as what's been offered by those who rely solely on dining out on perceived facts of the large looking prawn salad being a reality and refusing to accept it may simply be a reformed white fish with flavouring offered in the shape of a large prawn.
RollingStone said:
That there is the possibility someone with specific knowledge and practical experience could be correct and you are not.
Click to expand...
Absolutely.
There are many people out there, you and me included that will have facts based on experience of physical proof or such knowledge of something that offers them a very good idea of fact beyond a reasonable doubt that can, at the very least garner acceptance.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Lot's of stuff I say may not be correct.
Lots of stuff you say may not be correct.
This is where we're at.
It all comes down to gaining the ability to offer proof.
If proof cannot be offered then circumstantial evidence generally is.
If people struggle for that then they can use ready to peruse references to what's being argued and use that as their battering ram of truth but should also be under no illusions about their offering of a truth based on that is only an offering of appeal to that authority they trust in.
This also means that any alternative to what they believe is as valid as what's been offered by those who rely solely on dining out on perceived facts of the large looking prawn salad being a reality and refusing to accept it may simply be a reformed white fish with flavouring offered in the shape of a large prawn.

Absolutely.
There are many people out there, you and me included that will have facts based on experience of physical proof or such knowledge of something that offers them a very good idea of fact beyond a reasonable doubt that can, at the very least garner acceptance.
Click to expand...
Nar
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Lot's of stuff I say may not be correct.
Lots of stuff you say may not be correct.
This is where we're at.
It all comes down to gaining the ability to offer proof.
If proof cannot be offered then circumstantial evidence generally is.
If people struggle for that then they can use ready to peruse references to what's being argued and use that as their battering ram of truth but should also be under no illusions about their offering of a truth based on that is only an offering of appeal to that authority they trust in.
This also means that any alternative to what they believe is as valid as what's been offered by those who rely solely on dining out on perceived facts of the large looking prawn salad being a reality and refusing to accept it may simply be a reformed white fish with flavouring offered in the shape of a large prawn.

Absolutely.
There are many people out there, you and me included that will have facts based on experience of physical proof or such knowledge of something that offers them a very good idea of fact beyond a reasonable doubt that can, at the very least garner acceptance.
Click to expand...
WHAT
A
LOAD
OF
f***ing
SHITE
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Lot's of stuff I say may not be correct.
Lots of stuff you say may not be correct.
This is where we're at.
It all comes down to gaining the ability to offer proof.
If proof cannot be offered then circumstantial evidence generally is.
If people struggle for that then they can use ready to peruse references to what's being argued and use that as their battering ram of truth but should also be under no illusions about their offering of a truth based on that is only an offering of appeal to that authority they trust in.
This also means that any alternative to what they believe is as valid as what's been offered by those who rely solely on dining out on perceived facts of the large looking prawn salad being a reality and refusing to accept it may simply be a reformed white fish with flavouring offered in the shape of a large prawn.

Absolutely.
There are many people out there, you and me included that will have facts based on experience of physical proof or such knowledge of something that offers them a very good idea of fact beyond a reasonable doubt that can, at the very least garner acceptance.
Click to expand...

Nope.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
There are many people out there, you and me included that will have facts based on experience of physical proof or such knowledge of something that offers them a very good idea of fact beyond a reasonable doubt that can, at the very least garner acceptance.
Click to expand...

By your own acknowledgment when you’ve been tripped up several times, you don’t have any facts to present. You are deliberately contrary.

You state musings as fact and don’t accept anything other.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
You're wrong, In my opinion.
You can obviously argue against me and say the same thing as your own opinion.
Click to expand...
Ok. So I'm a bit dim.

The reason I think it is pressure sealed is because we have just had an annual pressure test where they failed to detect pressure leakage.

The reason I think the pressure is identical floor to ceiling is because I have environmental sensors telling me this is the case.

Are the people who did the pressure test also wrong, and therefore incompetent at their job?

Are the environmental sensors I'm using also wrong?
fyl2u said:
He doesn't even know what pressure is, and it's the basis of his whole theory of gravity. :lol:
Click to expand...
A force, with direction that knows which way is down.
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
Lot's of stuff I say may not be correct.
Lots of stuff you say may not be correct.
This is where we're at.
It all comes down to gaining the ability to offer proof.
If proof cannot be offered then circumstantial evidence generally is.
If people struggle for that then they can use ready to peruse references to what's being argued and use that as their battering ram of truth but should also be under no illusions about their offering of a truth based on that is only an offering of appeal to that authority they trust in.
This also means that any alternative to what they believe is as valid as what's been offered by those who rely solely on dining out on perceived facts of the large looking prawn salad being a reality and refusing to accept it may simply be a reformed white fish with flavouring offered in the shape of a large prawn.

Absolutely.
There are many people out there, you and me included that will have facts based on experience of physical proof or such knowledge of something that offers them a very good idea of fact beyond a reasonable doubt that can, at the very least garner acceptance.
Click to expand...
Someone in an earlier post described his specific practical experience with fibre optic cables. He had effectively tested the given science of light and found it to be valid. He effectively tested your musings and concluded they were bollocks. So is he lying or just part of the totally implausible global Earth conspiracy?
 

Back
Top