• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

All NUFC and Sportswashing here (threads will be merged)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Biffo The Bear said:
I support Newcastle.
Click to expand...

If Newcastle hadn't made so much noise about the 'evil Mike Ashley' the deathly quiet about the Saudis would not look quite as hypocritical.
Iansun45 said:
Basically the one with the most money because they only want a team that tries allegedly.
Click to expand...

Under Ashley the Mags said the ownership was vitally important.

Now they're claiming it's totally irrelevant.

Hypocrisy at the lowest level.
 
Last edited:

jimb said:
Must be hoping they get some decisions if they whinge enough.

Leicester game was clear penalty and i'm still not sure about the one in the city game. For the Liverpool goal I do think they had a case as the game is usually stopped with head injuries.
Click to expand...
It'll come up in parliament within the next 2 weeks. I'm sure their local member will raise it a a mental health issue affecting the NE
 
jimb said:
Must be hoping they get some decisions if they whinge enough.

Leicester game was clear penalty and i'm still not sure about the one in the city game. For the Liverpool goal I do think they had a case as the game is usually stopped with head injuries.
Click to expand...

The players were playing for it, both looked at the ref as they knew they were in trouble.

I've realised that the mags have a very sensitive following and take themselves very seriously.

I've got a suggestion, if they're not happy with PL refs, perhaps the we should do a trade with league one refs.
 
They conveniently ignore the facts that Wilson's goal v Burnley could have been chalked off for an infringement on the goalkeeper or that Lascelles could have conceded a penalty at Arsenal (I think) for a clear shove - two decisions that went their way.
 
I remember we complained about the refs and the football league actually agreed. Fast forward 2 years and it made fuck all difference.
 
JL1985 said:
I remember we complained about the refs and the football league actually agreed. Fast forward 2 years and it made fuck all difference.
Click to expand...
Aye they sent apology when Ross was managing as we lost canny few points for it. Made bit of a difference that year . Thing is they've been creamed as we know and they've been on the good end of few decisions in same games. Strange bunch.
 
We shouldn’t be concentrating on the owners horrific human rights record we should be concentrating on the fact that they gave Ashington the gate receipts from there game. Cracking set of lads
 
jimb said:
Must be hoping they get some decisions if they whinge enough.

Leicester game was clear penalty and i'm still not sure about the one in the city game. For the Liverpool goal I do think they had a case as the game is usually stopped with head injuries.
Click to expand...
The Leicester game Lascelles stuck his foot out, Maddison took the invite by leaving his foot in and playing for it. Lascelles didn’t appeal either but I must admit I wouldn’t have been happy if it had been given against us. The ‘head injury’ wasn’t a head injury and the ball was in the net 4 seconds after they went down. How quick is a ref supposed to react. The city one was a blatant pen tbf but we all have them.
 
jimb said:
Must be hoping they get some decisions if they whinge enough.

Leicester game was clear penalty and i'm still not sure about the one in the city game. For the Liverpool goal I do think they had a case as the game is usually stopped with head injuries.
Click to expand...
Except there was no head injury as clearly shown on here in the slow motion sequences. Didn't the ref subsequently explain that the player initially grasped a totally different part of his body?
They were play acting to try and get play stopped because both defenders realised they were in trouble; they even reacted to each others theatrics.
I'd have booked them both for simulation.
 
edna said:
Why are they complaining about one decision in games they got hammered in? Its not like it’s cost them any points! Feckin idiots.
Click to expand...
Cos they're going down so grasping as Messi wont join when in championship. Along with the fact they're the most self entitled kernts in football.
 
edna said:
Why are they complaining about one decision in games they got hammered in? Its not like it’s cost them any points! Feckin idiots.
Click to expand...

Diversionary tactics.

If they feel hard done to they can tell themselves they didn't really get a hiding, and wouldn't have done if they weren't cheated out of it.

All part of how they deflect from the fact that that their squad, and manager are nowhere near good enough
 
edna said:
Why are they complaining about one decision in games they got hammered in? Its not like it’s cost them any points! Feckin idiots.
Click to expand...
exactly, these decisions ( so i'm told ) level themselves out, you just know they are going to get a lucky one in a game against a relegation rival.
 
Redandwhitedust said:
Diversionary tactics.

If they feel hard done to they can tell themselves they didn't really get a hiding, and wouldn't have done if they weren't cheated out of it.

All part of how they deflect from the fact that that their squad, and manager are nowhere near good enough
Click to expand...
Razor said on Totalsport it may have been a totally different game if they had been awarded the penalty, aye Man City would have just went in to overdrive and probably would've put 5 or 6 past the fuckers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top