Put a flat earthier into space

[payne]

Just bits of the dome falling down

they need to figure out what's going on up there as this is happening at the same time each year

 

[BigPete]

they need to figure out what's going on up there as this is happening at the same time each year

Scheduled maintenance needs to reset for new year

 

[payne]

Scheduled maintenance needs to reset for new year

maybe they need to knock off a bit of the ice build up so the moon/sun reflection appears totally different to each other

 

[BigPete]

maybe they need to knock off a bit of the ice build up so the moon/sun reflection appears totally different to each other

Water level

 

[DaveH]

Just bits of the dome falling down

Predictably every year at the same time, and the direction of these things all appear to come from the middle of Gemini.

Why would bits of the dome drop off in such a predictable way and give the appearance of heading down and away from one point?

The standard explanation is that the earth is passing through the orbital debris of an observed comet. That would work.

But the dome fantasy says that a comet was observed (random short lived projection) and now at certain times of the year bits of the dome drop off exactly in the place the comet was observed but not anywhere else and the dome never used to do this so regularly before that. Err ok.

 

[Nobby]

Predictably every year at the same time, and the direction of these things all appear to come from the middle of Gemini.

Why would bits of the dome drop off in such a predictable way and give the appearance of heading down and away from one point?

The standard explanation is that the earth is passing through the orbital debris of an observed comet. That would work.

But the dome fantasy says that a comet was observed (random short lived projection) and now at certain times of the year bits of the dome drop off exactly in the place the comet was observed but not anywhere else and the dome never used to do this so regularly before that. Err ok.

Water level, innit chief

 

[BigPete]

Predictably every year at the same time, and the direction of these things all appear to come from the middle of Gemini.

Why would bits of the dome drop off in such a predictable way and give the appearance of heading down and away from one point?

The standard explanation is that the earth is passing through the orbital debris of an observed comet. That would work.

But the dome fantasy says that a comet was observed (random short lived projection) and now at certain times of the year bits of the dome drop off exactly in the place the comet was observed but not anywhere else and the dome never used to do this so regularly before that. Err ok.

Scheduled maintenance just a glitch that happens when the crystal projector resets its yearly cycle.

Makes a bit too much heat so the ice dome melts a bit and causes that to happen.

Who needs science.. easy this!

 

[payne]

Predictably every year at the same time, and the direction of these things all appear to come from the middle of Gemini.

Why would bits of the dome drop off in such a predictable way and give the appearance of heading down and away from one point?

The standard explanation is that the earth is passing through the orbital debris of an observed comet. That would work.

But the dome fantasy says that a comet was observed (random short lived projection) and now at certain times of the year bits of the dome drop off exactly in the place the comet was observed but not anywhere else and the dome never used to do this so regularly before that. Err ok.

Using musings and simple, repeatable and testable experiments I've come to the conclusion that this is all part of the natural life cycle of the cell.

To make it easy for you to understand just imagine skin cells on your own body coming off when using a towel. The regular intervals have most likely come about as the dome has psoriasis so produces more skin.

This also proves the earth is not a spinning globe we are told we walk upon.

 

[BigPete]

Using musings and simple, repeatable and testable experiments I've come to the conclusion that this is all part of the natural life cycle of the cell.

To make it easy for you to understand just imagine skin cells on your own body coming off when using a towel. The regular intervals have most likely come about as the dome has psoriasis so produces more skin.

This also proves the earth is not a spinning globe we are told we walk upon.

Thats snow man

 

[ned_werby]

Water level.

Not flat.

 

[BigPete]

Not flat.

It is I've seen it in the bath as well

 

[junglist31]

There's been 553 dudes gone to space. Can't believe every single one of them was in on it all. Amazing really.

 

[payne]

Watching Frozen Planet on BBC1. Fuck you Attenborough lying about being down the south pole. Don't ya know Pengiuns knock about with Polar Bears.

 

[DaveH]

There's been 553 dudes gone to space. Can't believe every single one of them was in on it all. Amazing really.

And when you look at the size of the supporting crew, right down to those building the craft and monitoring communications, you are looking at a 6 or 7 figure number.

 

[DPTT]

There's been 553 dudes gone to space. Can't believe every single one of them was in on it all. Amazing really.

Isaac Newton was in on the lie as well

 

[payne]

Thats snow man

snow, skin, pot, kettle.........something

And when you look at the size of the supporting crew, right down to those building the craft and monitoring communications, you are looking at a 6 or 7 figure number.

Hollywood has many departments to cover the crew right down to catering.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Logon or register to see this image

 

[Nukehasslefan]

He's always the same,it's the standard flerf response, they never debunk the globe, but the flat earth is easily debunked time and time again. They just parrot the same responses all the time, if he was as clever as he likes to think he is you'd think he would have realised what a pile of steaming excrement he is trying to peddle.

Debunking the spinning globe is easy and has been done.
You and other not accepting this does not mean it hasn't, it just means you don't accept the simple logic of it because you favour the ideal mainstream model. I accept that is the case and have no issue with people doing that.
Like I keep saying, most of us were brought up on it and many many other things that we cannot verify.

If you'd only offer some sort of proof that actually is proof rather than just repeating "water level" then we could leave the roundabout and go zooming along the bullshit bypass

This is about you searching your own logical mind against what you've been schooled into. If you choose not to do that then nothing said against that schooling will ever appease you and I fully get that.

The sun shines on it. The sun is really bright.

Aye, the sun shines on this grey cement like surface and lights it up like a beacon from what we see from where we are and yet quite a of of it is not so bright. Why would that be?
Also why does it only show a spotlight in the pictures of the so called men on the moon when it's lit up like a beacon to us mere minnows on Earth?

If you say they're on a studio set or something then that would make sense for the spotlights.
But seeing as you won't obviously say that then this glowing cement like so called moon is an issue, unless it's a reflection, like a hologram.

You missed the question asking you to confirm you have done no water level experiement just looked at a body of water and said 'hmm flatness'. Is this correct?

Anyone can do the water level experiments at any grade, from a small container or a sink or bath or puddle or pond or swimming pool or a lake...etc. None of this requires me to be part of. This just requires simple logic and the ability to see through utter fictional bull that was offered as factual all through our schooling to present day.
I'm still waiting for someone to confirm a spinning globe. Do you know of anyone that can do it?

People have been observing the moon, etc. for 100s, if not 1000s, of years.

I have myself. It doesn't mean it's a real solid object.

Way before we had CGI and SFX, so how has that happened?

What's happened is, we were told the moon was a ball of rocky cement like substance and later when SFX/CGI/staging was in its infancy we were shown some men on it and then when SFX/CGI got better, so did the little set ups for filming and actors.

It seems to be really veering off into some bizarre science-fiction where there have been controlling 'masters' since the dawn of time (with no known purpose).

Yeah, sort of.

F = M x V^2 / R

What are you explaining?

 

[fyl2u]

Debunking the spinning globe is easy and has been done.
You and other not accepting this does not mean it hasn't, it just means you don't accept the simple logic of it because you favour the ideal mainstream model. I accept that is the case and have no issue with people doing that.
Like I keep saying, most of us were brought up on it and many many other things that we cannot verify.

This is about you searching your own logical mind against what you've been schooled into. If you choose not to do that then nothing said against that schooling will ever appease you and I fully get that.

Utter drivel.

Aye, the sun shines on this grey cement like surface and lights it up like a beacon from what we see from where we are and yet quite a of of it is not so bright. Why would that be?

Because that's how light works.

Also why does it only show a spotlight in the pictures of the so called men on the moon when it's lit up like a beacon to us mere minnows on Earth?

What is this question in proper English?

If you say they're on a studio set or something then that would make sense for the spotlights.
But seeing as you won't obviously say that then this glowing cement like so called moon is an issue, unless it's a reflection, like a hologram.

More gibberish mixed in with some tinfoilhattery.

Anyone can do the water level experiments at any grade, from a small container or a sink or bath or puddle or pond or swimming pool or a lake...etc.

Correct, all they need is the right equipment, which you've never done or you'd see that it curves.

None of this requires me to be part of.

Requires, no. You should try it someday though. It'd help you see through the bullshit you've been fed by the flat earth community that you keep parroting.

This just requires simple logic and the ability to see through utter fictional bull that was offered as factual all through our schooling to present day.

No, it'd help you realise all that you were taught was real and give you the ability to see through all the fictional bull that was offered as factual all through your schooling by the flat earth community.

I'm still waiting for someone to confirm a spinning globe. Do you know of anyone that can do it?

There are plenty of them on this thread. You refuse to acknowledge ti though because if you did you think you'd look stupid.

Unfortunately for you, refusing to acknowledge it makes you look even more stupid.

I have myself. It doesn't mean it's a real solid object.

But it is.

What's happened is, we were told the moon was a ball of rocky

yes

cement like substance

no

and later when SFX/CGI/staging was in its infancy we were shown some men on it

Actually, about 30 years BEFORE CGI was in its infancy.

and then when SFX/CGI got better, so did the little set ups for filming and actors.

You mean when cameras got better.

Yeah, sort of.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Like I said, you don't seem to understand how the education system works beyond primary school. I suspect you left school before you reached your teenage years.

How does it work?
My experience was, we were taught to regurgitate and it was called a curriculum. Is this not right and if not, what is it we are taught?

Drivel. You're a parrot, the rest of us are actually capable of thinking for ourselves. You're just repeating the lies that the flat earth society have brainwashed you with.

We're all parrots/mimics.

After being brainwashed into thinking the so-called "stories told" were utter bull. Unfortunately for you, the stories you were told about those original stories being utter bull were utter bull and the original stories were right all along but you've dug your heels in way too deep to admit it now.

I actually had to try and figure out what the potential reality may be amid all of the utter bull that's been implanted into my skull from such a young age to present day. I'll never ficgure out the whole truth of life but just thinking outside the box allows me to see a lot of misinfo/disinfo that was battered into our heads.

I've had a real good think about it. I've also done experiments that prove it. Curved water level kills your cell world dead.

Curved water level suits you better than flat. No problem.

There's been 553 dudes gone to space. Can't believe every single one of them was in on it all. Amazing really.

• Bruce Willis as Harry S. Stamper.
• Ben Affleck as A.J. Frost.
• Will Patton as Chick.
• Steve Buscemi as Rockhound.
• William Fichtner as Colonel Willie Sharp.
• Owen Wilson as Oscar.
• You must be logged on to see external links
  as Bear
• You must be logged on to see external links
  as Lev Andropov
• You must be logged on to see external links
  as Max
• as Co-Pilot Jennifer Watts
• as General Kimsey
• as Gruber
• as Co-Pilot Tucker
• as Halsey
• There's 14 just from one film.

And when you look at the size of the supporting crew, right down to those building the craft and monitoring communications, you are looking at a 6 or 7 figure number.

Pretty big supporting cast just for armageddon and that's just one film.
Think of all the space films over time.