Put a flat earthier into space



Nukehasslefan said:
Not true.

Nope.
I've had 35 years of life going with a global narrative and 15 questioning it and everything connected to what that narrative was.
How long have you had with the global narrative?

Skewed?
I wouldn't say that.

No. I'm doing experiments that prove we don;t live on a spinning globe. As for my own Earth musing. It is what it is; a thought process with no factual back up.

That's the difference.
Click to expand...

Lies. Take your bath experiment.

You said "Use a spirit level or laser to draw a line around the bath then fill up the bath and you'll see the water is level".

We said "OK but to disprove the globe narrative, you need more accurate measuring equipment because the expected curve across such a small distance would be a fraction of a fraction of a millimeter if the globe narrative were true, therefore in order to disprove that narrative you need to be able to measure so accurately that you can actually prove that the fraction of a millimeter curve isn't there".

You said "No. Look, it's flat! No accurate measuring device is necessary. we can see that it's flat with our own eyes."

We said "You're doing it wrong. Look, using your 8 inches per mile squared rule that you agreed to earlier, extrapolate the numbers and tell us what the expected curve be across the length of a bath IF it were on a globe."

You said "I don't need to do the maths because baths on globes don't exist. It's flat, it's flat, it's flat."


So, stop lying about ignoring the globe possibility in your experiments and admit you are not doing proper science experiments, you're doing confirmation bias experiments that prove nothing about the globe shape.

We can all see that you're lying. The evidence is right here on this thread. You're now lying about saying things we can all see that you've said because they're here for all to see.

I don't know why you can't just admit it, when you've been caught in the act by everyone here.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
It's not about what it would look like to scale, it's about showing what the premise of it is if it was to be a gradual gradient towards the centre and a gradual gradient towards the outer; eventually turning up into a dome.
If I was to show you a flat line on a piece of paper and told you this is my analogy, orange squeezer Earth, what would you say?
You'd simply say, it's just a line.

So here's the script.
If you want to go with the gradual gradient to the centre and the same to the outer as it being totally flat then you go with that if it makes it easier for you.

I know what scale is but this scale would offer you nothing If I was to scale it right down.
I offered you a sketch and then did another. This is what you answer with, so how about you offer it to your scale and let's have a look.
Click to expand...
But scale is the main thing.
It shows things in proportion.
Your drawing to scale shows mega deep seas.
If it was to scale the sea would be barely a line and a flat earth.
As I say you can't have it both ways.
Charity money still stands if you can show a drawing that works
 
fyl2u said:
Lies. Take your bath experiment.

You said "Use a spirit level or laser to draw a line around the bath then fill up the bath and you'll see the water is level".

We said "OK but to disprove the globe narrative, you need more accurate measuring equipment because the expected curve across such a small distance would be a fraction of a fraction of a millimeter if the globe narrative were true, therefore in order to disprove that narrative you need to be able to measure so accurately that you can actually prove that the fraction of a millimeter curve isn't there".

You said "No. Look, it's flat! No accurate measuring device is necessary. we can see that it's flat with our own eyes."

We said "You're doing it wrong. Look, using your 8 inches per mile squared rule that you agreed to earlier, extrapolate the numbers and tell us what the expected curve be across the length of a bath IF it were on a globe."

You said "I don't need to do the maths because baths on globes don't exist. It's flat, it's flat, it's flat."


So, stop lying about ignoring the globe possibility in your experiments and admit you are not doing proper science experiments, you're doing confirmation bias experiments that prove nothing about the globe shape.

We can all see that you're lying. The evidence is right here on this thread. You're now lying about saying things we can all see that you've said because they're here for all to see.

I don't know why you can't just admit it, when you've been caught in the act by everyone here.
Click to expand...
If you want to go on about a bath and making out I say the Earth's flat because of it then you carry on.
I said about water conforming to a container it is in and it being flat and level whether it's a bath or a sink or a swimming pool or a pond of a lake...etc.

As for being caught out.
Where?
I don't see any catching out other than seeing a global model being a fiction, in my opinion.
But....like I say.... you are more than welcome to your thoughts, obviously.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
If you want to go on about a bath and making out I say the Earth's flat because of it then you carry on.
I said about water conforming to a container it is in and it being flat and level whether it's a bath or a sink or a swimming pool or a pond of a lake...etc.

As for being caught out.
Where?
I don't see any catching out other than seeing a global model being a fiction, in my opinion.
But....like I say.... you are more than welcome to your thoughts, obviously.
Click to expand...

You've been caught out lying, over and over and over.

This is just one of many examples.

The water in a container is not flat and level, whether that's a bath or sink or swimming pool.

That's not an opinion, that's a fact.
 
The Snockerty Friddle said:
We live on a globe, it rotates and you've been taken in by a con artist from over a century ago.
Simple enough?
Click to expand...
The fictional spinning global story is very simple. The storytellers did a good job. The only major issue with those fictional stories is, they get placed onto the fact shelves and people read them as fact even though they make no sense.
 

Back
Top