But will you so-called 'forget' or is it part of a
-
The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
Please read this thread for more details.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Put a flat earthier into space
- Thread starter southstander
- Start date
He is doing his best to move on from the tangent/normal debate, wonder why that is
More layers of what in the molecule?
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan
Winger
Nobody's talking about it as of yet.
Bring it back up and we'll go back through it, if you feel the need to.
Matter.
Any answers on my pendulum if you've looked into it properly?
And how I can see the same tiny star even if I move 2000 miles but can't see a ship because of a build up of atmosphere say 50 miles away?
And how I can see the same tiny star even if I move 2000 miles but can't see a ship because of a build up of atmosphere say 50 miles away?
GK
Striker
That last question will be ignored
How do you add "matter" to a molecule without it becoming something different and what is the matter that is being added to the molecule?
Nukehasslefan
Winger
It isn't different. It's just more dense matter of the very same things.
Got your drawing yet?
Not yet, I'm expecting something as detailed as da vinci could produce the time it's taken.
But was da vinci just another storyteller
Nukehasslefan
Winger
What was your question?
Height.
You're looking at a ship from an almost horizontal standpoint and through the same dense mass which takes away the reflected light back to your eyes.
You are looking at a point of light from an angled standpoint into a less dense sky enabling you to see more reflected light due to ever lessening atmospheric dense mass.
GK
Striker
Can I use a telescope and see further along the horizon if I'm almost horizontal from it?
Nukehasslefan
Winger
Clearly not.
To view it will be different in terms of make up.
A piece of wood is just that until you cut it into pieces and make something.
You can magnify what your naked eye can't make out but you'll never see farther.
Can I use a telescope and see further along the horizon if I'm almost horizontal from it?
Last edited:
But you can't add anything to a molecule without it fundamentally being changed. If you add atoms it becomes a different molecule, if you add protons to one of the atoms it becomes a different element, if you add neutrons it becomes an isotope, add electrons the atoms become ions
The Snockerty Friddle
Winger
“Are you answering this to number 2 quote?”
“Are you answering this to number 3 quote?”
Given that you gave three numbered points to which I gave three numbered responses you really don’t need to ask this, unless it’s just deflection.
As for your first point, yes, I do know what a planetarium is and how it works, but it shows the sky as seen from a global Earth. I asked you to show one that can accurately display what we can all see, but from the viewpoint of your cell. You can’t, because it isn’t possible. Someone in Australia has a full 180 degree panorama of sky to look at, as does someone in UK. But with entirely different stars/constellations.
1.The seating plan of the planetarium would have to be set out to represent the land masses of your cell-based Earth. The people from more northern places would have to sit near the centre while those from the so-called southern hemisphere would have to sit further out. How come they’d still see the same projected display as those from the north?
2.How would it accurately project the divide between day and night?
3.How many projectors are needed to display everything we can observe from Earth?
4.5 and 6. Who made the projectors? Who installed them? What was there before them?
7.If they’re natural and 4,5 and 6 don’t apply, how do they update themselves and adapt every time we supposedly launch another so-called satellite?
8.If the dome is constantly melting and re-freezing and reacting to waves of varying pressure, how come we see no deformation of the projection?
9.If it’s a diffuse reflector, how does it reflect sharp images?
10. If we are not to use knowledge passed on to us by others, or by schooling or learning then the same must surely apply to you. How then is so much of what you claim is lifted straight from the flat earthers bible?
“Are you answering this to number 3 quote?”
Given that you gave three numbered points to which I gave three numbered responses you really don’t need to ask this, unless it’s just deflection.
As for your first point, yes, I do know what a planetarium is and how it works, but it shows the sky as seen from a global Earth. I asked you to show one that can accurately display what we can all see, but from the viewpoint of your cell. You can’t, because it isn’t possible. Someone in Australia has a full 180 degree panorama of sky to look at, as does someone in UK. But with entirely different stars/constellations.
1.The seating plan of the planetarium would have to be set out to represent the land masses of your cell-based Earth. The people from more northern places would have to sit near the centre while those from the so-called southern hemisphere would have to sit further out. How come they’d still see the same projected display as those from the north?
2.How would it accurately project the divide between day and night?
3.How many projectors are needed to display everything we can observe from Earth?
4.5 and 6. Who made the projectors? Who installed them? What was there before them?
7.If they’re natural and 4,5 and 6 don’t apply, how do they update themselves and adapt every time we supposedly launch another so-called satellite?
8.If the dome is constantly melting and re-freezing and reacting to waves of varying pressure, how come we see no deformation of the projection?
9.If it’s a diffuse reflector, how does it reflect sharp images?
10. If we are not to use knowledge passed on to us by others, or by schooling or learning then the same must surely apply to you. How then is so much of what you claim is lifted straight from the flat earthers bible?
With the density of air being 1.225kg per m3... and so called gravity being caused by air pushing things down...
To keep this simple imagine a square shaped well or a mine shaft. It is 1mx1m. So every metre down is another cubic metre.
If i went 30 metres down a well/shaft and weighed myself would I be 36kg heavier?
The Snockerty Friddle
Winger
but, different densities of matter. See? I used to think like you too, I do understand.
But surely if its low in the sky and 40 times as far away that will negate that?
You may have a formula for your layers of density you could share and we will work it out together?
Pendulum, how do you explain if you put it in say inuvik/alaska (I nearly said the north pole but you don't believe in that) it will rotate once clockwise nearly every 24 hours, but if you put it in Antarctica or even santa cruz province it will rotate anti clockwise at roughly the same speed.
If you put it in Ecuador on what we call the equator it doesn't rotate at all.
Can you explain that or how that will happen on your flat/lemon squeezer world.
You can substitute any locations near the far and south poles and the equator and it still happens.
You must be logged on to see external links
GK
Striker
But you can see further if you view every other direction but horizontal?
