• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

The Snockerty Friddle said:
Well clearly you can, because you can stand at the beach and watch it happen. You could even take photographs of the effect, and then post them on here.
Click to expand...
Then don't try and argue skyscrapers not having any discernible lean on your globe you believe in if you go with this.
One minute Earth is so big it looks flat but ships fall over the curve only a few miles away and the next bridges span are taken into account for a globe and then skyscrapers are not seen as leaning away from each other but are, supposedly... but are perfectly plumb.

Hmmmm.
Absolute utter gobbledygook and contradictions like all of this global stuff.
payne said:
no. It's something. It can't be both simultaneously
Click to expand...
It's a globe to you. A spinning globe.
You don;t know this to be true but you go with it.

I have a different set up as do many other alternate thinkers....none of which may be true.

There can only be on true Earth and neither may be correct if facts were attainable, which they're not but appear to be to you, so that means your Earth is a spinning globe. The only thing it can be according to you and other like minded people.
 
Last edited:

Nukehasslefan said:
Then don't try and argue skyscrapers not having any discernible lean on your globe you believe in if you go with this.
One minute Earth is so big it looks flat but ships fall over the curve only a few miles away and the next bridges span are taken into account for a globe and then skyscrapers are not seen as leaning away from each other but are, supposedly... but are perfectly plumb.

Hmmmm.
Absolute utter gobbledygook and contradictions like all of this global stuff.
Click to expand...

More utter bilge, look up the humber bridge towers you clown.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Then don't try and argue skyscrapers not having any discernible lean on your globe you believe in if you go with this.
One minute Earth is so big it looks flat but ships fall over the curve only a few miles away and the next bridges span are taken into account for a globe and then skyscrapers are not seen as leaning away from each other but are, supposedly... but are perfectly plumb.
Click to expand...
If your skyscrapers are as tall as the horizon is distant, then you might have a point. But they're not and you dont.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Then don't try and argue skyscrapers not having any discernible lean on your globe you believe in if you go with this.
One minute Earth is so big it looks flat but ships fall over the curve only a few miles away and the next bridges span are taken into account for a globe and then skyscrapers are not seen as leaning away from each other but are, supposedly... but are perfectly plumb.

Hmmmm.
Absolute utter gobbledygook and contradictions like all of this global stuff.

It's a globe to you. A spinning globe.
You don;t know this to be true but you go with it.

I have a different set up as do many other alternate thinkers....none of which may be true.

There can only be on true Earth and neither may be correct if facts were attainable, which they're not but appear to be to you, so that means your Earth is a spinning globe. The only thing it can be according to you and other like minded people.
Click to expand...

More like facts aren't accepted by conspiracy theorists
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I'm not going to go into that.
Let's just say that, if you want to figure it all out all you need to do is to go down the simplistic route and see what happens with waves.
A wave is a wave, no matter what.
A wave will absolutely not work with no medium to travel in.
You will never be hit by moving water unless there is a wave that causes the water to travel through wave motion.
You will never feel the effect of a rope holding unless someone throws a wave along that rope.

Then you get down to small levels through atmosphere and thinner atmosphere where waves change but are still effectively the very same set up of motion.

It's all about action and equal and opposite reaction. No energy lost in reaction to energy applied...only dissipated or more focused, depending on pressure, vibration/friction and frequency.

It's also the very reason why space does not exist as we're told.
Why rockets cannot work in extreme low pressure never mind a supposed space vacuum.

And so on.
Click to expand...
So you are clinging to this idea that flys in the face of hundreds of thousands of scientists and engineers, would uncover the truth about if all these space probes and satellites are possible or not and you will not even say where the idea came from? You can’t say if you deduced this yourself or you learned this from somewhere?

To me that suggests you are not very secure about your reasoning.
Nukehasslefan said:
It's not about making a better measurement.

A simple spirit level will suffice in various experiments to do with water.
Plumb bobs hanging over water from either end of a levelled T piece.
All kinds of simple stuff.

The problem arises when the simple stuff shows Earth not be be a spinning globe.

Simple tools. I'm sure you understand. If not then have a think on it and go and do some simple experiments, for you. You don't have to tell anyone on here when it all comes back as proof you're not living on a spinning globe.
Do it for you but obviously still argue and make me out to be a stark raving loony. It's all good.

Nothing, because what you see now is exactly what you'd expect in any container on an Earth that is absolutely not a spinning globe.
Click to expand...
Ok a spirit level. I think the longest ones you can get from most DIY shops or builders merchants are 2 meters long. Clearly the longer the spirit level, the more of a curve you will see.

So, you are fond of your formula of a drop of 8 inches every mile squared. Apply that to a 2m length and tell us how much curve you would see. Remember you said such an experiment was fine on your orange squeezer earth because the amount of curve was very slight. Tell us how massive the curve is over a spirit level 2m long.
 
Last edited:
DaveH said:
So you are clinging to this idea that flys in the face of hundreds of thousands of scientists and engineers, would uncover the truth about if all these space probes and satellites are possible or not and you will not even say where the idea came from? You can’t say if you deduced this yourself or you learned this from somewhere?

To me that suggests you are not very secure about your reasoning.

Ok a spirit level. I think the longest ones you can get from most DIY shops or builders merchants are 2 meters long. Clearly the longer the spirit level, the more of a curve you will see.

So, you are fond of your formula of a drop of 8 inches every mile squared. Apply that to a 2m length and tell us how much curve you would see. Remember you said such an experiment was fine on your orange squeezer earth because the amount of curve was very slight. Tell us how massive the curve is over a spirit level 2m long.
Click to expand...

Beaten with his own logic once again. Essay of deflection and distraction incoming
 
Nukehasslefan said:
It doesn't stick to a slope. It's in a container up the slope.

Just like water is at the beach. It's in a concave container and stops at the curved up beach.
Just like other land where water crashes against elevations, like rock faces...etc.

This is what I tried to explain but it was ignored.
Click to expand...
No but on your map all of south America would be underwater, like a rock would be 3 feet out at the beach
 
DaveH said:
So you are clinging to this idea that flys in the face of hundreds of thousands of scientists and engineers, would uncover the truth about if all these space probes and satellites are possible or not and you will not even say where the idea came from? You can’t say if you deduced this yourself or you learned this from somewhere?

To me that suggests you are not very secure about your reasoning.

Ok a spirit level. I think the longest ones you can get from most DIY shops or builders merchants are 2 meters long. Clearly the longer the spirit level, the more of a curve you will see.

So, you are fond of your formula of a drop of 8 inches every mile squared. Apply that to a 2m length and tell us how much curve you would see. Remember you said such an experiment was fine on your orange squeezer earth because the amount of curve was very slight. Tell us how massive the curve is over a spirit level 2m long.
Click to expand...
To be honest I’ve never really understood his bath tub experiment 🤷‍♂️
 
I'm gong right down the rabbit hole on my day off. This bloke I find entertaining.

You must be logged on to see media items
 
DPTT said:
You must be logged on to see media items

@Nukehasslefan
Can you tell me why you don’t agree with this experiment?
To me it looks pretty conclusive and clear on what they have done and the results they obtained 🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...
Slope, gravity, hamsters, steps, pressure, waves, kittens, dome, ice, bath

or perhaps person, woman, man, camera, tv.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top