fyl2u
Striker
Be great to find him again
He's definitely on there. Even they think he's bonkers, too.
-
The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.
Put a flat earthier into space
- Thread starter southstander
- Start date
He's definitely on there. Even they think he's bonkers, too.
I've just told someone on another thread who has a dark windowless room to have a word with him about his experiments, I told him if he makes enough noise he should be fine.
The Snockerty Friddle
Winger
Not quite, we still dont know what an 'earthier' is.
fyl2u
Striker
I think it's about time the original threadstarter came back.
DaveH
Striker
One thing conspiracy theorists love, it is attention.
fyl2u
Striker
He must have been not used to people backing up their science conversations with proofs, and so as a consequence we're now all on ignore and he's getting no apparent attention anymore.
fyl2u
Striker
fyl2u
Striker
Ok I'll start. If The Sun gave us 10 times the normal level of vitamin D, how different would humans and plants be? That's assuming the Earth is spherical (keeps it on topic and stops the mods locking the thread) Don't tell 'em Pike
At least as different as they are today.
And that would be very different...we'd f**k off Covid mind
taipeisafc
Striker
Ok I'll start. If The Sun gave us 10 times the normal level of vitamin D, how different would humans and plants be? That's assuming the Earth is spherical (keeps it on topic and stops the mods locking the thread) Don't tell 'em Pike
Can't make enough to get to overdose levels apparently:-
Synthesis in the skin[
You must be logged on to see external links
]
Vitamin D3 is produced photochemically from 7-dehydrocholesterol in the skin of most vertebrate animals, including humans.
You must be logged on to see external links
The precursor of vitamin D3, 7-dehydrocholesterol is produced in relatively large quantities. 7-Dehydrocholesterol reacts with
You must be logged on to see external links
at of 290–315 nm. These wavelengths are present in sunlight, as well as in the light emitted by the UV lamps in (which produce ultraviolet primarily in the spectrum, but typically produce 4% to 10% of the total UV emissions as UVB). Exposure to light through windows is insufficient because glass almost completely blocks UVB light.Adequate amounts of vitamin D can be produced with moderate sun exposure to the face, arms and legs (for those with the least melanin), averaging 5–30 minutes twice per week, or approximately 25% of the time for minimal sunburn. The darker the skin, and the weaker the sunlight, the more minutes of exposure are needed. Vitamin-D overdose is impossible from UV exposure: the skin reaches an equilibrium where the vitamin degrades as fast as it is created.
The skin consists of two primary layers: the inner layer called the , and the outer, thinner . Vitamin D is produced in the of two innermost strata of the epidermis, the stratum basale and stratum spinosum, which also are able to produce calcitriol and express the VDR
Nukehasslefan
Winger
Can you say what's right about the so called experiments?
Of course but no more than the so called mainstream scientists. Don;t get them mixed up with real scientists that actually come up with real solutions to everyday life and actually show proof.
I actually thought it was massively logical to understand that everything needs a medium or it cannot exist.
Obviously the space stuff and the magical stuff we're schooled into is another matter, pardon the pun.
What I have too back it up is my concern. It's simple and I tried to explain the simplicity of one thing but people went into a frenzy so I won't waste another second on it.
If you have a good thinking mind and feel you can understand it then let's get back to centrifugal force or centripetal force. Does it require a medium in order to work?
Now bear in mind we are getting right back to the swing ball analogy but the crux is, does it require a medium to work in.
After all this is the supposed orbit explanation.
I'll make it easier.
If you are on a fairground rota or meteor...I'm sure you know what I'm talking about. How does it make you stay stuck to the inside of the outer rim?
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan
Winger
And you think everything's above board, right?
No need for you to worry about that.
And yet you still deal with me. Why?
If your answer is something like "ohhh because it's such fun to watch a nutter go on" then fair enough. At least it's a reason and not a reason to get overly bothered like you are.
payne
Striker
You must be logged on to see media items
wow
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan
Winger
I'm far from backed into any corner. I took a bit of time out because...and this may shock you.....I had things to do....but also I could see too many people were getting into a right frenzy so I took a back seat for a while even when I finished what I needed to do.
Nahhh, I'm good. The posting was to help the frenzied.
That depends on what you know to be wrong against what you know to be right. I don ;t see you offering any proof's. Unless I've missed out on you offering them. Have I?
I generally just see you appealing to your internet friends like this post.
Like you're stood on a stage explaining to them about me but not actually saying anything constructive.
Yep and give and take happens but not when the argument is based entirely from referencing historical books and unproven supposed workings then arguing as to why I can't show experiments when the simplest experiment on offer was water level that any logical minded person would accept in a debate if it wasn't so ingrained into their psyche that water actually curves very nicely around a big ball.
Baffling as hell but understandable because I once believed all that because I was schooled to all hell with it all.
To be fair I wouldn't be arguing if I was just going to say " ohhhh blooming heck, it is a spinning globe because lots of people have absolutely tried like hell to ridicule me for thinking otherwise."
I don't think so, do you?
I'll tell you what this is like.
It's like some big bullies coming up to a person in the playground and saying " the Earth is a spinning globe" and I say " I don't believe it is" and then getting kicked the hell out of and told " the Earth is a spinning globe now...right?" And I say, nahhh it's not....but I promise to think about it seriously if you can tell me how you know" to which the replies come all at once " we just do, ok, because everyone knows it's a spinning globe" and I say, "ok then tell me how you can prove to me right now?"
And then the punching and kicking and frenzy starts until I'm laid there battered and bruised with no answer to my question, other than "because it is, because that's what we were told."
This is just the milder verbal have a go.
And to think how many of you tried to unravel it and found you can't.
Or is it in your cases?
I don't reject everything. And it's pretty easy rejecting what is believed to be nonsense. It's not a strain to do it.
Nothing changes regardless.
Last edited:
See you in another 20/30 pages lads.
I'm far from backed into any corner. I took a bit of time out because...and this may shock you.....I had things to do....but also I could see too many people were getting into a right frenzy so I took a back seat for a while even when I finished what I needed to do.
Nahhh, I'm good. The posting was to help the frenzied.
That depends on what you know to be wrong against what you know to be right. I don ;t see you offering any proof's. Unless I've missed out on you offering them. Have I?
I generally just see you appealing to your internet friends like this post.
Like you're stood on a stage explaining to them about me but not actually saying anything constructive.
Yep and give and take happens but not when the argument is based entirely from referencing historical books and unproven supposed workings then arguing as to why I can't show experiments when the simplest experiment on offer was water level that any logical minded person would accept in a debate if it wasn't so ingrained into their psyche that water actually curves very nicely around a big ball.
Baffling as hell but understandable because I once believed all that because I was schooled to all hell with it all.
To be fair I wouldn't be arguing if I was just going to say " ohhhh blooming heck, it is a spinning globe because lots of people have absolutely tried like hell to ridicule me for thinking otherwise."
I don't think so, do you?
I'll tell you what this is like.
It's like some big bullies coming up to a person in the playground and saying " the Earth is a spinning globe" and I say " I don't believe it is" and then getting kicked the hell out of and told " the Earth is a spinning globe now...right?" And I say, nahhh it's not....but I promise to think about it seriously if you can tell me how you know" to which the replies come all at once " we just do, ok, because everyone knows it's a spinning globe" and I say, "ok then tell me how you can prove to me right now?"
And then the punching and kicking and frenzy starts until I'm laid there battered and bruised with no answer to my question, other than "because it is, because that's what we were told."
This is just the milder verbal have a go.
And to think how many of you tried to unravel it and found you can't.
Or is it in your cases?
I don't reject everything. And it's pretty easy rejecting what is believed to be nonsense. It's not a strain to do it.
Nothing changes regardless.
Nah that's completely wrong.
payne
Striker
wrongI'm far from backed into any corner. I took a bit of time out because...and this may shock you.....I had things to do....but also I could see too many people were getting into a right frenzy so I took a back seat for a while even when I finished what I needed to do.
Nahhh, I'm good. The posting was to help the frenzied.
That depends on what you know to be wrong against what you know to be right. I don ;t see you offering any proof's. Unless I've missed out on you offering them. Have I?
I generally just see you appealing to your internet friends like this post.
Like you're stood on a stage explaining to them about me but not actually saying anything constructive.
Yep and give and take happens but not when the argument is based entirely from referencing historical books and unproven supposed workings then arguing as to why I can't show experiments when the simplest experiment on offer was water level that any logical minded person would accept in a debate if it wasn't so ingrained into their psyche that water actually curves very nicely around a big ball.
Baffling as hell but understandable because I once believed all that because I was schooled to all hell with it all.
To be fair I wouldn't be arguing if I was just going to say " ohhhh blooming heck, it is a spinning globe because lots of people have absolutely tried like hell to ridicule me for thinking otherwise."
I don't think so, do you?
I'll tell you what this is like.
It's like some big bullies coming up to a person in the playground and saying " the Earth is a spinning globe" and I say " I don't believe it is" and then getting kicked the hell out of and told " the Earth is a spinning globe now...right?" And I say, nahhh it's not....but I promise to think about it seriously if you can tell me how you know" to which the replies come all at once " we just do, ok, because everyone knows it's a spinning globe" and I say, "ok then tell me how you can prove to me right now?"
And then the punching and kicking and frenzy starts until I'm laid there battered and bruised with no answer to my question, other than "because it is, because that's what we were told."
This is just the milder verbal have a go.
And to think how many of you tried to unravel it and found you can't.
Or is it in your cases?
I don't reject everything. And it's pretty easy rejecting what is believed to be nonsense. It's not a strain to do it.
Nothing changes regardless.
