• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

NUFC/Sportwashing

Status
Not open for further replies.

forever changes said:
Who’s asking you to apologise ? By the way how bad would an owner have to be for you to say no ? Would Epstein have been ok if alive and was as rich as the Saudis ? Is there any barrier unacceptable to Newcastle fans
Click to expand...
I'll never say no to being a Newcastle United fan. I'm in it for life.
If new owners change it to something I don't recognise, as in the name of Newcastle United, only then would I cease to be a fan, or shock horror, we fold.
4everredandwhite said:
So, in a nutshell, you are saying that you being a Newcastle supporter overrides everything else?
Click to expand...
No. It doesn't override my family.
 
forever changes said:
All I want is entertainment and effort 😂 that old cliched shite. Would love you to say that in front of the current players that they don’t give 100% effort ! Why support them then or cheer when they score ?
Click to expand...
I don't recall saying they haven't.
10 Gary Rowells said:
You need to quit. You are misusing the term subjective morality. That what you owner did Vis a Vis Khashoggi is not subjectively immoral, it's objectively immoral. I don't need to protest against it for it to be objectively immoral. If that sort of person bought my club I would protest by not going and not giving them a penny more of my money. It's not even difficult. You are just squirming - just in my subjective opinion of course.
Click to expand...
I'm talking subjective morality where people are concerned in terms of what they use as their battering ram to argue a point from whilst being happy enough to forsake morals on other issues.
When it suits.
I think I'm ok with how I've worded it.
 
Last edited:
Poacher said:
That’s what’s pissed me off the most the way the local journalists covered do canio compared to this . And when we point out the biases people say it’s in our head look north etc. In 2013 I remember reading a post from a north east journalist saying if we celebrate a goal under di canio we are supporting fascism. This is a million times worse and nothing from the local media
Click to expand...
You must be logged on to see external links
 
genewolf said:
Could the mods not undertake a bit of extra judicial banning? I know he hasn't done anything particularly wrong but he is excessively stupid and boring.
Click to expand...

Normally I'm happy to watch them burn themselves out.

Even people like the fishy bloke get bored of their own patter after a while.
But there are some people who simply post to get a reply - that's it - it doesn't matter what the subject is, they just feel great with getting a reply.

So they'll never stop with their inane, circular drivel.

So yeah - reluctantly I'd say people like that need shutting down.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I'll never say no to being a Newcastle United fan. I'm in it for life.
If new owners change it to something I don't recognise, as in the name of Newcastle United, only then would I cease to be a fan, or shock horror, we fold.

No. It doesn't override my family.
Click to expand...
The world is flat and you don’t care what happens in it outside of your little bubble. You could give Stephen King a run for his money you absolute whopper.
 
Valo87 said:
all you’ve done there is admit you’ll turn a blind eye to anything and anyone if it means Newcastle are successful…. I couldn’t but maybe that’s just how I was brought up. I thought the northeast people had abit more about them
Click to expand...
Nahhh. What I've said is, I'm a Newcastle united fan and supporter and I'll continue to do so through thick and thin like I always have.
I'll bold it.
 
Mr Clarko said:
Where did I dismiss 'cast iron facts'? If they are 'cast iron facts' what is there to discuss?

You can't interject a discussion, spew half a dozen irrelevant, highly complicated and complex issues (or 'facts') into a reply and expect someone to address and 'engage' with it because you said so... That's not how it works buddy. Straw man.

I see that YOU haven't engaged with my response to the RELEVANT points in your previous comment, I wonder why... Speaks volumes that.
Click to expand...
I wonder why YOU didn't engage with my question why you have suddenly appeared after not a peep for over 4 years?
 
Father Jack Hackett said:
I wonder why YOU didn't engage with my question why you have suddenly appeared after not a peep for over 4 years?
Click to expand...
I've answered that question, more than once on this thread... Here's one from earlier:

'I haven't read/posted on this forum for 4 years, I returned to look at the posts regarding the takeover and I was shocked at the amount of human rights activists that were commenting... Is that clear enough for you buddy? Simple enough to grasp?'
 
Mr Clarko said:
I've answered that question, more than once on this thread... Here's one from earlier:

'I haven't read/posted on this forum for 4 years, I returned to look at the posts regarding the takeover and I was shocked at the amount of human rights activists that were commenting... Is that clear enough for you buddy? Simple enough to grasp?'
Click to expand...
Just decided to take a look after Friday's news then "buddy"?
Even your own call you a WUM. Whatever makes you happy though, I suppose
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top