• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

Water conforms to the shape of the container it is in like a bath. Always finds its level so can't possibly curve.
But he says because there's an ice dome that means its in a container so the lemon squeezer model works because it's enclosed and has steps in the ocean. Keep up man.
Pretty much that. Basically the northern hemisphere can’t work because bathtubs, but a lemon squeezer where the middle bit is pretty close to a hemisphere does work because science changes depending on viewpoint.
 

My map?

No, it's not.

I said it a long time ago and also on here a fair way back.
Maybe you overlooked it or came in too late.
The map you posted to show us what you think the earth pretty much łooks like. The one with the Atlantic ocean on a slope a few thousand miles long you know? The ocean not confirming to its lemon squeezer container whatsoever?
 
The map you posted as being a good representation of what you thought earth might look like.
Not my map then, is it?
The map you have being trying to distance yourself from ever since.

As in, how?
Kind of your Ratner moment (for those of us of a certain vintage)
My Ratner moment would be showing the globe up for what it is. Tat.
Pretty much that. Basically the northern hemisphere can’t work because bathtubs, but a lemon squeezer where the middle bit is pretty close to a hemisphere does work because science changes depending on viewpoint.
Try spinning your globe with water on it.
Because gravity, right?
A force.....oops, is it a force or an acceleration or something?
Magic.
The map you posted to show us what you think the earth pretty much łooks like. The one with the Atlantic ocean on a slope a few thousand miles long you know? The ocean not confirming to its lemon squeezer container whatsoever?
Indentations.
Massive Earth.
Anything else?
 
Last edited:
Not my map then, is it?


As in, how?

My Ratner moment would be showing the globe up for what it is. Tat.

Try spinning your globe with water on it.
Because gravity, right?
A force.....oops, is it a force or an acceleration or something?
Magic.

Indentations.
Massive Earth.
Anything else?
Try understanding angular momentum and working out which is stronger, the force flinging water out vs gravity.

Actually soak a tennis ball in water and spin it fast. Water flies off, spin it one rotation per 24 hours and observe how much water is flung off. We are talking basics here.
Try understanding angular momentum and working out which is stronger, the force flinging water out vs gravity.

Actually soak a tennis ball in water and spin it fast. Water flies off, spin it one rotation per 24 hours and observe how much water is flung off. We are talking basics here.


Though great deflection there. I point out the middle bit of your map is half a globe....but but something else, quick look away and discuss another subject to hide the obvious failing in my argument.
 
Last edited:
Aye, so they tell us. They tell us it's so close as to be a vacuum but still has a few scattered particles in, not to mention big rocks and gaseous planets and fiery suns dotted about...but we won't go into that.

Ok so let's look at felix's supposed balloon capsule jump.
It was said he fell from 128,000 feet and his free fall gathered pace to 800 mph before atmosphere slowed him down.
The reason for his freefall was due to it being so close to a vacuum as to basically be one....as we were told.

So let's hop back into your space again and let's sort out this not a vacuum carry on, as you say.
You see the contradictory stuff borders on hilarity but I'll keep a near straight face and try and be serious over these stories.
It isn't easy when you see the mockery of those who push this nonsense.

I'll just have to let you decide what a gradual gradient would be and what an indentation would be over a massive expanse of Earth.
Nothing more I can say really.

So Felix Baumgartner and his entire team are all liars then? The air is thinner at 128,000 feet (due to lower atmospheric pressure hence less dense gas) so the drag is lower hence you can travel at a higher terminal velocity, once the air gets thicker drag increases and he slows down to a lower terminal velocity - really quite simple even for someone as thick as you. You really are an utter moron.
 
Indentations.
Massive Earth.
Anything else?
Indentations enough to stop water running down a slope thousands and thousands of miles long would show as steps if they were to contain it?
Can't say there are many steps in the Atlantic.
Again I'm looking at your map clearly showing a slope down from the centre this isn't something I'm proposing.

You said water will always be flat in a container so these indentations would act as containers?
 
So Felix Baumgartner and his entire team are all liars then? The air is thinner at 128,000 feet (due to lower atmospheric pressure hence less dense gas) so the drag is lower hence you can travel at a higher terminal velocity, once the air gets thicker drag increases and he slows down to a lower terminal velocity - really quite simple even for someone as thick as you. You really are an utter moron.

And he wonders why the partial vacuum of space is cold. I’d love to see him counter the laws of thermodynamics.
 
Last edited:
Try understanding angular momentum and working out which is stronger, the force flinging water out vs gravity.

Actually soak a tennis ball in water and spin it fast. Water flies off, spin it one rotation per 24 hours and observe how much water is flung off. We are talking basics here.

Ahhhh this old story again.

Tell me, Dave, how was your Earth equator bulging out and your poles flattening out caused?
The spin of your Earth?
But now it must be something else....right?
Though great deflection there.
Yep you certainly tried.
I point out the middle bit of your map is half a globe....but but something else, quick look away and discuss another subject to hide the obvious failing in my argument.
Half a globe?
If you want to look on it as a nice big convexity over distance to the centre then by all means go with that but remember it's not spinning at over 1000 mph to throw anything off like your spinning Earth certainly would.

It's just a case of people taking leave of their own logical mind in favour of a set out narrative they know does not make rational sense....but, who wants to be known as a nutcase for daring to think logically?

Luckily I'm happy to be taking up that mantle because I can't go with a nonsense narrative like a spinning global Earth and all of the gunk that goes with trying to make it appear a reality.
 
Ahhhh this old story again.

Tell me, Dave, how was your Earth equator bulging out and your poles flattening out caused?
The spin of your Earth?
But now it must be something else....right?

Yep you certainly tried.

Half a globe?
If you want to look on it as a nice big convexity over distance to the centre then by all means go with that but remember it's not spinning at over 1000 mph to throw anything off like your spinning Earth certainly would.

It's just a case of people taking leave of their own logical mind in favour of a set out narrative they know does not make rational sense....but, who wants to be known as a nutcase for daring to think logically?

Luckily I'm happy to be taking up that mantle because I can't go with a nonsense narrative like a spinning global Earth and all of the gunk that goes with trying to make it appear a reality.

Drivel
 
So Felix Baumgartner and his entire team are all liars then?


We could start with Kittinger if you want to go down that route.
The air is thinner at 128,000 feet (due to lower atmospheric pressure hence less dense gas) so the drag is lower hence you can travel at a higher terminal velocity, once the air gets thicker drag increases and he slows down to a lower terminal velocity - really quite simple even for someone as thick as you. You really are an utter moron.
Yeah and you can miraculously arrest an 800 mph fall into atmosphere in your nice suit to deploy your little drogue parachute and then your big parachute to slow you down to manageable touchdown.
Honestly man, It beggars belief...but there you go.
 
We could start with Kittinger if you want to go down that route.

Yeah and you can miraculously arrest an 800 mph fall into atmosphere in your nice suit to deploy your little drogue parachute and then your big parachute to slow you down to manageable touchdown.
Honestly man, It beggars belief...but there you go.

So Felix Baumgartner is in your opinion a liar yes or no.

And the rest is just more crap from your increasingly aggresive attempts to support a load of BS i dont even think you believe
 
Any news on the stepped Atlantic so that water that seems to slope thousands of miles can stay flat over this distance?
Without lots of steps that ships couldn't pass?
 
Yeah and you can miraculously arrest an 800 mph fall into atmosphere in your nice suit to deploy your little drogue parachute and then your big parachute to slow you down to manageable touchdown.
Honestly man, It beggars belief...but there you go.

What do you consider to be the difference in density between air and water?
We could start with Kittinger if you want to go down that route.

Yes please.
 
We could start with Kittinger if you want to go down that route.

Yeah and you can miraculously arrest an 800 mph fall into atmosphere in your nice suit to deploy your little drogue parachute and then your big parachute to slow you down to manageable touchdown.
Honestly man, It beggars belief...but there you go.

now parachutes are fake?
So Felix Baumgartner is in your opinion a liar yes or no.

And the rest is just more crap from your increasingly aggresive attempts to support a load of BS i dont even think you believe

he's became well aggressive over the last few weeks. he's basically saying everyone but him is thick as fuck at this point.
 
Last edited:
According to the buffoon tides are caused by mythical and undetectable pressure wave now the largest tidal difference on average is 11.7 m in Nova Scotia so the atmospheric pressure would need to change by around 1.1bar between high a low tide nobody has ever detected a pressure swing of that magnitude ever and that sort of pressure swing is noticeable (similar to being 11.7 m underwater) - yet he thinks a global earth and tides caused by lunar effects is ludicrous. What an utter plank
 
We could start with Kittinger if you want to go down that route.

Yeah and you can miraculously arrest an 800 mph fall into atmosphere in your nice suit to deploy your little drogue parachute and then your big parachute to slow you down to manageable touchdown.
Honestly man, It beggars belief...but there you go.
Are we going to talk about Kittinger yet?
 
Ahhhh this old story again.

Tell me, Dave, how was your Earth equator bulging out and your poles flattening out caused?
The spin of your Earth?
But now it must be something else....right?

Yep you certainly tried.

Half a globe?
If you want to look on it as a nice big convexity over distance to the centre then by all means go with that but remember it's not spinning at over 1000 mph to throw anything off like your spinning Earth certainly would.

It's just a case of people taking leave of their own logical mind in favour of a set out narrative they know does not make rational sense....but, who wants to be known as a nutcase for daring to think logically?

Luckily I'm happy to be taking up that mantle because I can't go with a nonsense narrative like a spinning global Earth and all of the gunk that goes with trying to make it appear a reality.
Well how about you address my question first, rather than go over old ground that you will just claim bollocks to anyway.

Your lemon squeezer has the northern hemisphere as a hemisphere. You say the northern hemisphere can't work on a globe. Why do it work for yours but not for the reality?
 
Back
Top