Not a moment too soon.Good
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not a moment too soon.Good
It's like Hitler asking people to recycleTheir logic is pretty skewed. 63% of the housing stock is privately owned (outright or under mortgage) and insulation is an investment that increases property value. I can see why the Govt. should incentivise insulation of public housing stock, but not owner occupiers.
While the figures they quote, if true, are disgraceful, they are never going to get the public on board with this one. It's double-glazing and fibreglass! Not subjects anybody gets passionate about.
Waiting on answer via pm. You'll bottle it of course you f***ing wet.Can’t share personal details on a public forum, I’d cop a ban, especially considering the explicit content.
Inbox me hun x
Claiming that heavy rain in October is anything to do with climate change s a daft as saying it is a lieJust normal Autumn weather. Climate change is all a lie.
Did you know that there are deserts that were once vast lakes.Just normal Autumn weather. Climate change is all a lie.
Crazy weather patterns and events are happening with much greater frequency. Flash floods, high winds, extreme heat with resultant fires.Did you know that there are deserts that were once vast lakes.
I'm not debunking climate change, it's happened throughout the entire history of the world.
When you're ready big dog..... Nothing in my pm's.Crazy weather patterns and events are happening with much greater frequency. Flash floods, high winds, extreme heat with resultant fires.
I blame the containing of water as much as anything, just a theory of mine.Crazy weather patterns and events are happening with much greater frequency. Flash floods, high winds, extreme heat with resultant fires.
Claiming that heavy rain in October is anything to do with climate change s a daft as saying it is a lie
Watch the C4 documentary I posted, has some interesting theoriesI blame the containing of water as much as anything, just a theory of mine.
Will do, I like stuff like that.Emergency on Planet Earth
As the climate crisis worsens, Channel 4 News charts the devastating impact it is having on Planet Earth.www.channel4.com
I know that but this programme was interesting regarding weather patterns
Watch the C4 documentary I posted, has some interesting theories
Still waiting big boyEmergency on Planet Earth
As the climate crisis worsens, Channel 4 News charts the devastating impact it is having on Planet Earth.www.channel4.com
I know that but this programme was interesting regarding weather patterns
Watch the C4 documentary I posted, has some interesting theories
That's your problemAbsolutely daft what they’re doing. I respect the aim but not the method
You really think insulating a home increases its value? I really don't think so. Unless its a very old building with specialist insulation.Their logic is pretty skewed. 63% of the housing stock is privately owned (outright or under mortgage) and insulation is an investment that increases property value. I can see why the Govt. should incentivise insulation of public housing stock, but not owner occupiers.
While the figures they quote, if true, are disgraceful, they are never going to get the public on board with this one. It's double-glazing and fibreglass! Not subjects anybody gets passionate about.
Shittest way to make a point I think I've ever seen.Yougov Poll
London
Oppose: 45%
Support: 19%
North
Oppose: 54%
Support: 13%
Male
Oppose: 60%
Support: 19%
Female
Oppose: 47%
Support: 12%
Labour
Oppose: 45%
Support: 22%
Conservative
Oppose: 70%
Support: 11%
LibDem
Oppose: 50%
Support: 24%
18-24
Oppose: 36%
Support: 14%
65+
Oppose: 64%
Support: 14%
ABC1
Oppose: 56%
Support: 16%
C2DE
Oppose: 49%
Support: 16%
That's certainly a part. Less porous surfaces means more run-off, which means more chance of flooding.I blame the containing of water as much as anything, just a theory of mine.
You really think insulating a home increases its value? I really don't think so. Unless its a very old building with specialist insulation.
And yes, I do think the government should incentivise it. Same as they should not have stopped the solar PV FITs payments. Every unit of lecky, every unit of gas that we don't have to use for heating homes is a benefit to everyone.
Its clear that many people can't be bothered to do it - otherwise it would be done by now. So more pushing it needed.
Shittest way to make a point I think I've ever seen.
What was the question? What was the 3rd option that isn't being listed?
That's certainly a part. Less porous surfaces means more run-off, which means more chance of flooding.
However, we also see record rainfall, that's nothing do with how the water is contained. 2 FEET just landed in Italy in 12 hours.
Now its Boris telling people that climate activists have every right to be angry and then taking them to court to get injunctions against their protests.Wasn't it Cameron who claimed he'd have the greenest government ever, then massively de-incentivesed folk installing solar panels by reducing the FIT. Just barmy!
Well if you want to sell a house, which is the only accurate way to determine its value, there is a legal requirement to provide an Energy Performance Certificate which assesses such things as insulation and double-glazing in awarding an A to G rating. This rating impacts on the price of the house, and often on the buyers ability to get a mortgage. So I would argue that it definitely increases property value to insulate.You really think insulating a home increases its value? I really don't think so. Unless its a very old building with specialist insulation.
And yes, I do think the government should incentivise it. Same as they should not have stopped the solar PV FITs payments. Every unit of lecky, every unit of gas that we don't have to use for heating homes is a benefit to everyone.
Its clear that many people can't be bothered to do it - otherwise it would be done by now. So more pushing it needed.
Absolutely f***ing meaningless. No-one wants to be held up in traffic.Yougov Poll
London
Oppose: 45%
Support: 19%
North
Oppose: 54%
Support: 13%
Male
Oppose: 60%
Support: 19%
Female
Oppose: 47%
Support: 12%
Labour
Oppose: 45%
Support: 22%
Conservative
Oppose: 70%
Support: 11%
LibDem
Oppose: 50%
Support: 24%
18-24
Oppose: 36%
Support: 14%
65+
Oppose: 64%
Support: 14%
ABC1
Oppose: 56%
Support: 16%
C2DE
Oppose: 49%
Support: 16%