• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

taipeisafc said:
Merely your musings, don't need to prove anything as obviously Australia doesn't exist just a big scam and not well done I mean vegemite ffs
Click to expand...
It is all subtle brain washing. I rebooted my laptop and the MS backdrop of the day was Uluru (obviously Marsden Rock and photoshop) but that and the so called Kylie are just subtle lie reinforcements eating into everyday life.
 

nahwee said:
The image that‘s presented when you put into Google Earth a place you want to see.

For example - I put in my home address, the globe moves to my location and I can zoom in to my back garden.
What I see when I zoom in is a very accurate arial view of my back garden – lawns, paths, trees, garden furniture etc..

And it’s not just my back garden I can look at, it’s everybodies!
Click to expand...
Yep and I have no issues with what you see.
What you don't see, are up to date images. Nothing like up to date. In fact some are many months previous. I'm sure that's not lost on you....right?

nahwee said:
As I said, and although I can’t prove it, I believe these images, or photos if you like, are made by using a satelite orbiting the earth.
Click to expand...
And you're obviously entitled to think that. Why wouldn't you?
I mean, we were all handed this narrative to follow so most of us do. I once did.
nahwee said:
As you’re not convinced of satelites, how do you think Google gets these?
Click to expand...
If you look at the pictures, they become realistic at plane height. Try it and see where the CGI starts and where it ends to become terrain reality.
ned_werby said:
"uninhabitable frozen zones". where are these please? and where is the "centralized sun"?
Click to expand...
Read back and you'll get up to speed on it.
DaveH said:
Thanks, but I've reached the limit of what I can do. I've got a block of parmesan cheese in the fridge. I'll try that and come back if I have more success.

He can scream fictional calculations all he wants, but everyone can see a working mathematical model right in front of his face.
Click to expand...
A working mathematical model for what? Not for reality that's for sure.


DaveH said:
It is the same as me screaming Australia is fictional. Doesn't matter how many times I say it, it doesn't make it fictional.
Click to expand...
True but it can be proven by those that go to it. It doesn't mean it's under a globe, which cannot be proven.
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
.

Plenty that didn't add up but water level was a game changer and the moon landing stuff, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc. It just went on and on.
You see when you see one discrepancy it all starts to unravel.
Click to expand...

So have you fitted everything around water in a bath?
Or is there other stuff. Just saying etc etc is pretty vague.

Even if you don't believe the moon landing that doesn't disprove a globe though.
 
What A Waster said:
Even if you don't believe the moon landing that doesn't disprove a globe though.
Click to expand...
It does for me, especially then they take the absolute pee out of us all.
Imagine people falling for this gunk.

I don't think I need to go into it for people to see how they mock us.

You must be logged on to see external links
 
It takes some level of arrogance to say you know more than the rest of humankind combined either alive now or in the past. I'll give him that.
 
The Snockerty Friddle said:
1st paragraph is entirely correct if you take out the "but"
From that point on it descends into nonsense.
Earth and Sun are not joined by a bit of string and dont behave as if they were.
Your red lines prove only that you have not understood what is shown.
Click to expand...
I've fully understood what's shown and it's nonsense.
There's no mechanism for it to work like they show us.


I'll make this more simple.

If the sun model was spinning and the Earth simply stayed on its axial tilt as we're shown, just stationary but itself spinning, then you would not have any seasons.

But they have it wobbling around the sun over a year because that's the only way they can cater for a globe.
Our very own senses tell us otherwise.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I've fully understood what's shown and it's nonsense.
There's no mechanism for it to work like they show us.


I'll make this more simple.

If the sun model was spinning and the Earth simply stayed on its axial tilt as we're shown, just stationary but itself spinning, then you would not have any seasons.

But they have it wobbling around the sun over a year because that's the only way they can cater for a globe.
Our very own senses tell us otherwise.
Click to expand...

Show me your workings to prove its nonsense.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I've fully understood what's shown and it's nonsense.
There's no mechanism for it to work like they show us.


I'll make this more simple.

If the sun model was spinning and the Earth simply stayed on its axial tilt as we're shown, just stationary but itself spinning, then you would not have any seasons.

But they have it wobbling around the sun over a year because that's the only way they can cater for a globe.
Our very own senses tell us otherwise.
Click to expand...
Yet again you say you understand and then prove otherwise.

"There's no mechanism for it to work like they show us." there clearly is but you dont want to accept it.

" they have it wobbling around the sun over a year" No they dont. There is no wobble over a year except in your misunderstanding.

"I'll make this more simple." No you wont.
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
I've fully understood what's shown and it's nonsense.
There's no mechanism for it to work like they show us.


I'll make this more simple.

If the sun model was spinning and the Earth simply stayed on its axial tilt as we're shown, just stationary but itself spinning, then you would not have any seasons.

But they have it wobbling around the sun over a year because that's the only way they can cater for a globe.
Our very own senses tell us otherwise.
Click to expand...

yeah seasons just don't happen.
 
Without orbital interactions between a round earth, moon, and sun, I'm wondering how our wise one can teach me to understand moon phases and the lunar cycle.
 
Kevj said:
No. You’ve been provided with repeatable mathematical models several times over which you dismiss out of hand.
You provide a model which can be checked and verified which corroborates your theory.
Click to expand...

but he's not trying to prove his as fact just telling us all that it's definitely a fact that everyone else throughout history is wrong apart from him.
 
SYB_DC said:
Without orbital interactions between a round earth, moon, and sun, I'm wondering how our wise one can teach me to understand moon phases and the lunar cycle.
Click to expand...
Shadows from crystals within the earth reflecting onto other crystals stuck on his living dome which reflect each other in perfect harmony🤷‍♂️
@Nukehasslefan this right or too many crystals🤷‍♂️
 
The Snockerty Friddle said:
Yet again you say you understand and then prove otherwise.

"There's no mechanism for it to work like they show us." there clearly is but you dont want to accept it.

" they have it wobbling around the sun over a year" No they dont. There is no wobble over a year except in your misunderstanding.

"I'll make this more simple." No you wont.
Click to expand...
It certainly does not move around the sun model without wobbling around it by the model.
payne said:
yeah seasons just don't happen.
Click to expand...
They do happen but they don't happen with a global set up, meaning no globe is rotating on any axis around a central sun.
The seasons happen because it's the sun that moves, not the Earth.
 
Last edited:
Kevj said:
No. You’ve been provided with repeatable mathematical models several times over which you dismiss out of hand.
You provide a model which can be checked and verified which corroborates your theory.
Click to expand...
I haven't been provided with anything that works. I've been shown diagrams of magical mysteries that supposedly work.
There is nothing in the so called space vacuum that can orientate a spinning globe in the fashion we've been shown in diagrams.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top