TheDataGuy
Midfield
what about this
You must be logged on to see external links
?
-
The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.
Put a flat earthier into space
- Thread starter southstander
- Start date
Nukehasslefan
Winger
Tell me what you would do that nails your globe.
Just explain it and explain why it has to be a globe and central sun.
If you can't or need to use historical stories then just admit that's what your reliance is on.
What about it?
It's a fisheye lens.
Last edited:
TheDataGuy
Midfield
Evidence, that is what I rely on
Nukehasslefan
Winger
Good, so you must have some that can prove a fact, right?
TheDataGuy
Midfield
But then the people would look weird, It is an iphone
Watch the first 5 seconds and then the last 20-30 seconds
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan
Winger
You can see the distortion. What are you trying to argue?
Are you trying to say you can see massive convex curvature from a few hundred feet?
TheDataGuy
Midfield
Yes, done a couple of times, even given you handy ways to check it.
Nukehasslefan
Winger
Maybe some of your mates on here might help you out.
TheDataGuy
Midfield
When was the earth made? And how was it made? Are dinosaurs real?
DaveH
Striker
I read that 3 times and thought what???
Basically seems to have said do exactly what the person there has done and if I get the same results then I've done it wrong, not that the earth is wrong.
Said from someone who admitted they had never looked through a telescope and has never done any observations of the night sky.
We have already pointed you in the direction of several scientific studies by professionals with years of experience of studying this stuff. How about you show us your evidence to prove any of your absolute drivel is true.
Nukehasslefan
Winger
I have no clue whatsoever.
Possibly a cell growth, replenish just like the ones in our bodies, etc.
Not too sure about dinosaurs of 60 million years ago as we're told but I believe there could've easily been massive beasts roaming, just as I believe there was massive human like beings, as well as smaller.
payne
Striker
now he's onto that ancient aliens stuff!
Do you know how old the earth is? Generally speaking.
You never replied to doing a test at keilder which should drop about 48" from memory. That would totally debunk your theory.
In fact didn't the knackers on that flat earth docu debunk themselves trying to prove the earth was flat.
Nukehasslefan
Winger
So therefore you should have no problem showing me the facts....right?
Simply appealing to authority does not gain you any facts, nor prove anything.
My hypothesis/musing/theory/guess or whatever anyone wants to bestow upon it, is told as just that and not conveyed as factual.
All I can do is give my reasons for my thoughts which are ridiculed en masse (and expected) and basically overlooked, which brings us back to this carry on.
Put this in your memory bank.
Absolutely no idea.
I did answer.
Humans seem to have been around for a few thousand years.
We've supposedly only managed to advance in technology within that last few hundred years.
Looking at the trees and also the petrified trees, plus decay of land mass.....etc, it's also possible this has been going on for many many thousands of years before humans. Maybe 10's of thousands or even hundreds of thousands.
However, I think this cell is limited and has a life span that is likely closer to old age rather than young cell development.
But this is just a wild guess.
It beats the hell out of a big bang and a 4.5 billion year old Earth we're told about.
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan
Winger
That's what the so called scientists tell us their global Earth age is.
I can only go on that.
You must be logged on to see external links
Lead is serviced from Uranium. We know this because we can measure with reasonable accuracy the level of radioactive decay. This is a proven science. The people who calculated this are scientists and not in any way ‘so called’.
There’s many peer reviewed papers available which corroborate the experiments, the calculations a fun the findings. This isn’t something you made up to fool the masses. It exists. It is science fact.
To say what? That there would be no drop as in your model or there would be a drop of 48"
