• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

NUFC thread 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.

MackemX said:
I've knocked this up for you ;)

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
On the one hand I want to suggest you seek help, but on the other hand that's well organised and impressive. :lol:

Out of curiosity, is there data available to work out what % of the stadium was full during those years?
 
Good article in the chronicle......they cannot help themselves though - 40,000 people locked out😆

Newcastle United v Sunderland and an Easter riot at St James' Park 120 years ago

You must be logged on to see external links
 
Cloughie said:
On the one hand I want to suggest you seek help, but on the other hand that's well organised and impressive. :lol:

Out of curiosity, is there data available to work out what % of the stadium was full during those years?
Click to expand...
You wanted to suggest I need to seek help says the mag living abroad yet on a SAFC forum every day? 🤔😂🤣

It's a website by the way 🤫

You must be logged on to see external links
 
MackemX said:
I've knocked this up for you ;)

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...

Checking the historical attendance statistics, since 1893-4 (their first FL season) Newcastle have only finished outside the top 20 averages on four occasions with their lowest placement being 26th in 1980-81. On that singular stat, that makes them nore consistently well-supported through history than either Arsenal (5 times and lowest 27th) and ManUtd (5 times and lowest 34th).
I believe Newcastle also score more 20,000+ attendances than any other club since the early days of the EFL.
 
Cloughie said:
Out of curiosity, is there data available to work out what % of the stadium was full during those years?
Click to expand...
Not content with winning the Net Spend trophy, you’re now after the Percentage Stadium Crowd one as well.

Do you now believe a club pulling in 25,000 in a 30,000 stadium is performing better than a club pulling in 50,000 with a stadium capacity of 60,000 just because it has less empty seats?
 
Mr B said:
Not content with winning the Net Spend trophy, you’re now after the Percentage Stadium Crowd one as well.

Do you now believe a club pulling in 25,000 in a 30,000 stadium is performing better than a club pulling in 50,000 with a stadium capacity of 60,000 just because it has less empty seats?
Click to expand...
I was more just curious tbh mate, had nothing to do with proving a point or anything.

Same with the net spend thing really. It's not about being 'right' in the same way you lot spending £1m or whatever it was when you went down.

It's to show, this is how we got here. We've got a Championship manager that has spent a lot of money by our standards, and he's got us with 2 wins in 21. I know you lot hate Rafa, but he also finished seasons very strongly. He never had us with 2 wins in 21. He also didn't get nearly the freedom Bruce has with signings. He signed some whoppers, definitely, but he also picked up some really good bargains for us and I've not seen that with Bruce.
 
Possibly Fulham won't get enough points as they're simply not good enough though they've got three or four exciting players. So prem money for Mike again next year. Does he spend it on a new manager and give him all of it to spend or does he think " fuck that I'm bored with that shit considering I'm loathed "
 
Rokerparkpies said:
Looks like they are media darlings again!!
What is it with them and media rim licking????
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Click to expand...
It’s the Keegan factor. The hype and media frenzy that was generated around the club from the mid 90s even up until the early 00s Champions league days with Robson. The hype and frenzy was so strong it still hasn’t faded away to this day.
 
Wolfbeard said:
It’s the Keegan factor. The hype and media frenzy that was generated around the club from the mid 90s even up until the early 00s Champions league days with Robson. The hype and frenzy was so strong it still hasn’t faded away to this day.
Click to expand...

Only in your deluded heads
 
Thatheaderman said:
Possibly Fulham won't get enough points as they're simply not good enough though they've got three or four exciting players. So prem money for Mike again next year. Does he spend it on a new manager and give him all of it to spend or does he think " fuck that I'm bored with that shit considering I'm loathed "
Click to expand...
I doubt he would have any kind of emotional response or reason for that. But!!
you just have to look at his tatty shops with their fake closing down sales to guess he'll be happy to waddle along with Bruce again. Bruce will see staying up as some kind of vindication :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top