Onmywayallan
Full Back
Imagine him at Man City? He’d score 40 a season no problem.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sssssshhhhh.But he won the golden boot at a World Cup? When does he often fail, by not scoring?
ps. @Ashley In!! really?
As an edit to my earlier post. Admit you were wrong in calling Harry Kane a ‘flash in the pan’ and ‘utter shite’. It’s ok to admit you’re wrong about footballers, it doesn’t really matter. I thought van Nistelrooy wouldn’t score more than 10 a season and got that wrongAdmit what?, the lad has won nothing, failed on the big stage time and time again. He scored a couple of goals against a shite team, try bumping the thread when he fails in a cup final, in a World cup or against a top side. I find it very funny that so many members bump this when he scores, never when he fails, which he does often.
You said he was a flash in the pan yet he’s regularly scored goals in the premier league for 8 year.Admit what?, the lad has won nothing, failed on the big stage time and time again. He scored a couple of goals against a shite team, try bumping the thread when he fails in a cup final, in a World cup or against a top side. I find it very funny that so many members bump this when he scores, never when he fails, which he does often.
Admit what?, the lad has won nothing, failed on the big stage time and time again. He scored a couple of goals against a shite team, try bumping the thread when he fails in a cup final, in a World cup or against a top side. I find it very funny that so many members bump this when he scores, never when he fails, which he does often.
You said he was a flash in the pan yet he’s regularly scored goals in the premier league for 8 year.
The fact he hasn’t won anything isn’t his fault surely
That would be scary and unfair for the rest of the league.Imagine him at Man City? He’d score 40 a season no problem.
Aye he's made me look a right tit there mind, hasn't he?But he won the golden boot at a World Cup? When does he often fail, by not scoring?
ps. @Ashley In!! really?
True, mate. It’s always nice to see him make a tit out of himself likeHahaha this thread just gets better
What a total and utter wum
Priceless, keep it up!!
Why are you trying to engage in sensible conversation with an internet troll
Just laugh at him like the rest of the board does. He is what he is.
Andy Cole and J F Hasselbaink both did it I think.Kane looks likely for both top scorer and top assists.. any player ever done that before in the top division?
Edit: and possibly goal of the season
Kane looks likely for both top scorer and top assists.. any player ever done that before in the top division?
Edit: and possibly goal of the season
Beat me to itAndy Cole and J F Hasselbaink both did it I think.
Great question.
1993/94 Andy Cole. 34 goals 13 assists.
98/99 Hasselbaink 18 goals 13 assists
In 2003, Henry got 20 assists, and 24 goals but came second in the golden boot to Van Nistlerooy with 25 goals.
Beat me to it
Cheers for that, some achievement to get both in a season
Interesting that Kane is currently on 13 assists already, equalling the pair... will take some effort to get to 34 goals mind
You’ve said assume they’re the same age then stated haaland is going to be very good, doesn’t make sense. So he’d peak when he’s 30? Or in this alternate reality is Kane now 20?Who would you choose Kane or Haaland? For the purposes of this question assume they’re the same age.
I’d go Haaland even though I love Kane. I just think Haaland is going to be very, very special but I hope there’s some love for Harry if anybody can actually be arsed answering
Both extremely similar and evenly matched in every department but athletic ability. Haaland for me but it's very close and we don't even know if he has peaked yet. Haaland is naturally stronger and quicker by a small amount imo...thats all I can split them on.Who would you choose Kane or Haaland? For the purposes of this question assume they’re the same age.
I’d go Haaland even though I love Kane. I just think Haaland is going to be very, very special but I hope there’s some love for Harry if anybody can actually be arsed answering
He basically means to ignore age and just take them at face value in terms of ability. Obviously most would pick Haaland straight away as he is young and will possibly keep improving.You’ve said assume they’re the same age then stated haaland is going to be very good, doesn’t make sense. So he’d peak when he’s 30? Or in this alternate reality is Kane now 20?
Who would you choose Kane or Haaland? For the purposes of this question assume they’re the same age.
I’d go Haaland even though I love Kane. I just think Haaland is going to be very, very special but I hope there’s some love for Harry if anybody can actually be arsed answering
Haaland has had one good season.