Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No mate I’m quoting the value of the fund. What in invested 3 yrs ago and what it’s value is now has increased by 20%+When people quote % are you referring to shares % compared to cash ?
No mate I’m quoting the value of the fund. What in invested 3 yrs ago and what it’s value is now has increased by 20%+
Obviously it fluctuates but doing decent so far.
Yep just realised and edited itHe's talking about the Vanguard 60,80% etc not ROI I believe.
No mate I’m quoting the value of the fund. What in invested 3 yrs ago and what it’s value is now has increased by 20%+
Obviously it fluctuates but doing decent so far.
Edit sorry you mean the 60 and 100%.
60% is 60 shares and 40 bonds which is lower risk
100% is shares and higher risk
If you are a basic rate tax payer when you contribute and when you withdraw the difference is not that great. You basically get tax relief on the 25% lump sum, therefore 20% of 25% so 5%. As you say a mixture of both to suit your circumstances is best.People saving for retirement in ISA’s are losing out on the tax relief you get from investing in a pension and the growth on that extra tax relief (40% relief for some). If you you want to retain access to some money than why not do a bit of both! People must like paying tax! If you look at the difference between putting £1000 net a year into a pension to an isa the difference would be mega
People saving for retirement in ISA’s are losing out on the tax relief you get from investing in a pension and the growth on that extra tax relief (40% relief for some). If you you want to retain access to some money than why not do a bit of both! People must like paying tax! If you look at the difference between putting £1000 net a year into a pension to an isa the difference would be mega
Could be different amounts in each pot skewing the percentages to something other than 60, 80 or 100.Any reason why you've opted for 60 & 100? Rather than just going for the 80 as its essentially the same thing
Could be different amounts in each pot skewing the percentages to something other than 60, 80 or 100.
At the time think it was slightly less risk if I remember. The 100% one was just to compare. Obviously 100% is prone to wider fluctuations but it's a long term saving account so fingers crossed.Any reason why you've opted for 60 & 100? Rather than just going for the 80 as its essentially the same thing
At the time think it was slightly less risk if I remember. The 100% one was just to compare. Obviously 100% is prone to wider fluctuations but it's a long term saving account so fingers crossed.
I like the simplicity of opening/maintaining it.
Vanguard Asset Management | Personal Investing in the UK
www.vanguardinvestor.co.uk
if you're self employed low earner , as some are especially women who often part time, then you can only pay into the pension as much as you earn for each yearPeople saving for retirement in ISA’s are losing out on the tax relief you get from investing in a pension and the growth on that extra tax relief (40% relief for some). If you you want to retain access to some money than why not do a bit of both! People must like paying tax! If you look at the difference between putting £1000 net a year into a pension to an isa the difference would be mega
This is true but I’m not sure what you’re point is. Everyone gets tax relief at their highest rate. It’s basically a tax refund into your pension. Then you can take a tax free lump sum aged 50 I thinkif you're self employed low earner , as some are especially women who often part time, then you can only pay into the pension as much as you earn for each year
And the growth on the tax contributionsThat's only if you're doing it instead of a pension. If you already have a works pension & basic rate tax payer then the only saving is the tax on the 25% lumper. But you then lose loads of flexibility. So it's worth doing a bit of both.
Again you are forgetting about the growth gained on the tax contributions, compounded its massiveIf you are a basic rate tax payer when you contribute and when you withdraw the difference is not that great. You basically get tax relief on the 25% lump sum, therefore 20% of 25% so 5%. As you say a mixture of both to suit your circumstances is best.
That's only if you're doing it instead of a pension. If you already have a works pension & basic rate tax payer then the only saving is the tax on the 25% lumper. But you then lose loads of flexibility. So it's worth doing a bit of both.
Lots of disadvantages too such as being able to access it on a whim and leaving yourself without a retirement pot. A big advantage for pensions is you can’t touch so it forces you to keep it for your retirement. A pension is also in a trust so it doesn’t form part of your estate on death which is good for inheritance tax reasons etc.Indeed - I pay into two pensions as well as a S&S ISA. The advantage of a the ISA is that you can access the money in case of an emergency.
No I’m notAgain you are forgetting about the growth gained on the tax contributions, compounded its massive
You are mixing up CGT with income tax thoughNo I’m not
Actually I think I amYou are mixing up CGT with income tax though