• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Sale is close - Barnsey

Status
Not open for further replies.

young2077 said:
Have to spoilt it mate 🤣
Click to expand...

May not have to according to the below
*edit grasping at straws as this looks like dealing with the UK in general. But ya never know there may be special business dispensations for billionaires

You must be logged on to see external links
“
Representatives of a foreign country or territory and representatives of the British overseas territories, along with their families or dependents travelling to the UK to undertake official business with the UK
This includes representatives of foreign countries or territories who are travelling to the UK on official visits, for example to attend negotiations.

You will not need to complete the Public Health passenger locator form.

You will not need to self-isolate if it is confirmed that you are travelling to the UK for official business which cannot be undertaken whilst self-isolating.

If your family members or other dependents travel with you, they’ll need to self-isolate after they arrive in the UK.

Before you travel, your mission or a representative of your country or territory will need to notify the FCO who will issue an exemption letter to show at the border
 
Last edited:
Rizla said:
Unless he is UK based I would be doubtful as he would have to self isolate for 14 days upon arrival in the UK.
Click to expand...
How do you know he hasn’t? He might have stayed on after the Southampton and Derby loan negotiations.

I’m not saying he has, like, just that it’s possible.
 
rubberface said:
He's asking if i've shown any proof.. he got a f***ing nerve.
Click to expand...

I agree he is more or less saying ya full of shit.

If any of you do have genuine info, you won't have proof anyway as anything you have could be faked quite easily (text messages etc.)

He hasn't shown proof and neither have you, people can believe what you're both saying or not. Easy really.

I choose to believe there is two interested parties, three if we include the madman with a beard, and you are getting information on different parties.
 
wigwams said:
Surely if FPP are involved then they can block any other parties getting anywhere? Unless their loan is paid off. Worst case scenario if Donald holds all the cards
Click to expand...

I think it's slightly more nuanced than that, but in essence you're right. I think that Donald needed to get their agreement that it was ok for him to publicly solicit a buyer for assets that their loan was secured against. but I think that was done at the turn of the year. From that point on they couldn't block him talking to people or paying back the loan to get a deal done.

I now have some doubts about the nature of their convertible loan after seeing MSD do the same with Southampton and Derby, if I'm honest. If specifics were added to the loan agreement, then that would give me more confidence that there was an option to convert, but I had a chat with someone about bail-in legislation the other day and I think they may not be able to do it if Donald can prove he is still solvent and doesn't want them to, @Grumpy Old Man what do you think? It looks to me as if they'd need Donald to be massively in the red with no remedial options or prospect of sale?

*for reference, the bail-in legislation wording in our charge sheet was created after the financial crash so that people owed money by institutions wouldn't be left out of pocket if failing businesses went to the wall, not to unilaterally allow a bank to take shares in a business it has lent to if it is successful or they felt it was a good investment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top