horselover
Striker
ThisOr Nixon hasn’t got a clue. Nothing new in anything he’s said today. Just trying to get a few hits.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ThisOr Nixon hasn’t got a clue. Nothing new in anything he’s said today. Just trying to get a few hits.
Look at all of his Sunderland news. Players and this. All regurgitated and tells us he knows nothing new. He might be right but this is all what has been said already - Garbutt, Graham, Sarkic, Sartori - the lot. All it says to me is ‘no one has told me owt else in the past fortnight’.it doesn’t say that though unless i read it wrong, it says redistribution of shares to current lot, i assume giving JS controlling share
he’s stuck to his story since FPP went tits up, he might be wrong but i tend to believe him more than Barnes. We’ll soon see
This all day.All three of them need to bugger off. Having Sartori as owner would just be as bad with Donald and co still behind the scenes
Satori hasn't been involved in the running of the club, he just took a share. It would be very different with him involved and committed. Need to just wait and see. Id rather this than one of the other mental cases linked to buying the clubAll three of them need to bugger off. Having Sartori as owner would just be as bad with Donald and co still behind the scenes
He’s pushing Danny Graham again so from that perspective let’s hope so!Or Nixon hasn’t got a clue. Nothing new in anything he’s said today. Just trying to get a few hits.
Other than employing the wrong people i'm struggling to think what Ellis Short did wrong. Please enlighten me why he'd be almost as bad as SD.
Disagree. I think you underestimate how actively bad Donald and his decision-making has been for Safc. His incompetence is staggering. As of right now we don’t have evidence that sartori is as bad. It’s tough to imagine anyone could be tbh.All three of them need to bugger off. Having Sartori as owner would just be as bad with Donald and co still behind the scenes
Except he also mental, trying to be a politician and not understanding why we could just sign loads of Uruguayan youngsters. Getting his original shares for next to nowt etcSatori hasn't been involved in the running of the club, he just took a share. It would be very different with him involved and committed. Need to just wait and see. Id rather this than one of the other mental cases linked to buying the club
This all day.
Why would Donald want to be a minority shareholder of a football club it is too dangerous for him to even go and watch play......
Donald says alot of things, doesn't make it true. Actions speak louder than words.Satori was a little distracted at first and he was always in it for future ownership. Donald said that all along.
He would as he'd be taking over, with new people on board and safc would transfer to a new company.
No I'm not, Donald needs to fuck off, but they are all linked by association and seemed happy to fiddle share value to get his 30%Disagree. I think you underestimate how actively bad Donald and his decision-making has been for Safc. His incompetence is staggering. As of right now we don’t have evidence that sartori is as bad. It’s tough to imagine anyone could be tbh.
Rhetorical question to be fair as there is only one answer £££££££££'s
end of mate !!!!!!
Look at all of his Sunderland news. Players and this. All regurgitated and tells us he knows nothing new. He might be right but this is all what has been said already - Garbutt, Graham, Sarkic, Sartori - the lot. All it says to me is ‘no one has told me owt else in the past fortnight’.
Fair enough. However for me the malignant influence on Safc is Donald. He’s the one who, despite being utterly inept, was trying to play at being a club chairman. Sartori is just a big bag of nothing. I’d take that over Donald every single time, though. Arrogance and stupidity are a very dangerous combination - as we’ve seen to our cost over the past two years.No I'm not, Donald needs to fuck off, but they are all linked by association and seemed happy to fiddle share value to get his 30%
I’ll go back to what I’ve said throughout. I don’t want Donald making decisions and I don’t trust him to be forward thinking as he wants a quick buck. Whoever takes over needs to commit to a five year plan - have a strategy and money to invest in making it work including strengthening the academy and signing more up and coming players not free transfer dead legs worth nowt to sell. Basically build a sustainable club. I don’t give a shite who as long as they have a clear way of doing things and are competent. Personally I wouldn’t even care if Donald had some shares as long as his power of decision making is limited and his firmly in the minority.He’s pushing Danny Graham again so from that perspective let’s hope so!
Still, I’d be happy with any deal that removes Dopey Donald from safc though.
Rhetorical question to be fair as there is only one answer ££££££££
I’m feeling quite vindictive at the moment, marra, so if there’s a way for Safc to succeed whilst Donald loses a load of money, let’s go for thatI’ll go back to what I’ve said throughout. I don’t want Donald making decisions and I don’t trust him to be forward thinking as he wants a quick buck. Whoever takes over needs to commit to a five year plan - have a strategy and money to invest in making it work including strengthening the academy and signing more up and coming players not free transfer dead legs worth nowt to sell. Basically build a sustainable club. I don’t give a shite who as long as they have a clear way of doing things and are competent. Personally I wouldn’t even care if Donald had some shares as long as his power of decision making is limited and his firmly in the minority.