Sale is close - Barnsey

[Boot Cleaner]

Is South of France a hint towards former Monaco owners?

Let's not get ahead of ourselves

But

WE'RE f***ing MINTED

 

[kingkeane]

Is South of France a hint towards former Monaco owners?

His father-in-law lives in Monaco.

 

[Gaz]

Is South of France a hint towards former Monaco owners?

possibly, he’s said all along nobody is buying us at current price

 

[Wardley Makem]

His father-in-law lives in Monaco.

Ah man. Who is in France then? Or does he mean Monaco when saying France

 

[Mowgli]

Not worth getting excited about tbh

 

[Wardley Makem]

possibly, he’s said all along nobody is buying us at current price

Price won't be an issue with Satori. He wouldn't be this far along without being close to an agreement

Not worth getting excited about tbh

Nah. Stick the snooker on instead

 

[Boot Cleaner]

Not worth getting excited about tbh

It is if Dmitry gets involved

 

[Burnopfield Mackem]

Other than employing the wrong people i'm struggling to think what Ellis Short did wrong. Please enlighten me why he'd be almost as bad as SD.

He inherited a PL club, left behind a 3rd division club ran by Donald.

 

[wigwams]

It is if Dmitry gets involved

He's just made that bit a out Monaco up man. What a crock of shite

 

[Boot Cleaner]

Juan's a billionaire ffs BTW.... Why would he need backers

 

[Mowgli]

It is if Dmitry gets involved

Would get not be knocked on the head for criminal charges?

Nixon has said all along its more about redistribution of shares and people on here got carried away, in all likelihood its probably just sartori going to own it and exactly the same structure as it is now.

 

[Gaz]

Price won't be an issue with Satori. He wouldn't be this far along without being close to an agreement

Nah. Stick the snooker on instead

hes already part owner, would he be doing due diligence or exclusivity? I suspect not, so either there isn’t a consortium interested and Barnes was wrong or they've dropped out imo

 

[Mowgli]

Juan's a billionaire ffs BTW.... Why would he need backers

Because he's never been that

Juan's a billionaire ffs BTW.... Why would he need backers

Because he's never been that interested and doesn't want to commit that much cash to something hea previously spent 1m on.

 

[hertsmackem]

He inherited a PL club, left behind a 3rd division club ran by Donald.

short just wanted out, he knew he was gonna lose so he cut his losses. He didn’t care who he sold to and concocted this Donald parachute money deal fast so that it was all done and dusted. It was the final I’ve tried my best fuck off to us fans

 

[filfy]

Sound like it’s all a bit of a diversion, trying to drive a wedge between the fans , hope i‘m wrong but Donald’s got form for making things up

 

[Wardley Makem]

Would get not be knocked on the head for criminal charges?

Nixon has said all along its more about redistribution of shares and people on here got carried away, in all likelihood its probably just sartori going to own it and exactly the same structure as it is now.

Satori was a little distracted at first and he was always in it for future ownership. Donald said that all along.

hes already part owner, would he be doing due diligence or exclusivity? I suspect not, so either there isn’t a consortium interested and Barnes was wrong or they've dropped out imo

He would as he'd be taking over, with new people on board and safc would transfer to a new company.

 

[sir rowell cummins]

hes already part owner, would he be doing due diligence or exclusivity? I suspect not, so either there isn’t a consortium interested and Barnes was wrong or they've dropped out imo

Or Nixon hasn’t got a clue. Nothing new in anything he’s said today. Just trying to get a few hits.

 

[hertsmackem]

Fantastic we will have a team full of Uruguayans

 

[Grimes]

Sound like it’s all a bit of a diversion, trying to drive a wedge between the fans , hope i‘m wrong but Donald’s got form for making things up

This, I feel it’s always been this way ever since the Barnes tweet.

 

[Gaz]

Satori was a little distracted at first and he was always in it for future ownership. Donald said that all along.

He would as he'd be taking over, with new people on board and safc would transfer to a new company.

it doesn’t say that though unless i read it wrong, it says redistribution of shares to current lot, i assume giving JS controlling share

Or Nixon hasn’t got a clue. Nothing new in anything he’s said today. Just trying to get a few hits.

he’s stuck to his story since FPP went tits up, he might be wrong but i tend to believe him more than Barnes. We’ll soon see