in what season?
16/17 when we were both in the championship
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
in what season?
in what season?
Not when the season began they didn't, they panic buyed a load of shite in January which included, Hogan (9.5M), Bree(3.5M), Hourihane (3.5M), Lansburys (3M), Bjarnsson (2m) and finished 13th.16/17 when we were both in the championship
True, but can be distorted by some large short term deals (see Ibra at Man Utd). I prefer amortization (transfer fee/contract length). Not sure if this will work...Wage bills are more binding than transfer fees. It’s a bigger indicator of how much a club spends.
Deffo 56/57 marraHe said transfer records
Think they were but entered the 56/57 one
Stop being daft. Newcastle have competed with those 3 teams and you know they have.Ambition.
So He's been spoilt then - he needs too get used to the idea of your being averageI don't think he is cherry picking a period, he is talking about his period not the entire history of NUFC. He hasn't been going to the match since 1955 he's been going since the 90's.
His experience of supporting Newcastle is they were a good side and regularly in Europe until Ashley came along. It's understandable he will be itching to get back to how things were pre Ashley for him.
Like I say it's ok to dare to dream?For that to happen they would have to never spend another penny and you lot would need to spend billions
Its 20 year to late for you to win stuff. You will simply become an Everton or Wolves
Like I say it's ok to dare to dream?
They can hope for a return to it, they can realistically say that it's not beyond the club. In terms of expectations? I guess it's relevant, but it becomes less significant as time moves on. The early 90s was >25yrs ago. By comparison, Newcastle stopped being a European regular 13 yrs ago.Tranmere were frequent visitors to Wembley in the early 90's. Is this relevant or irrelevant to my mate's (who started watching them then) current expectations?
Because not all clubs have Leicester's finances, not all owners see it as the best way for their club to operate, not all owners have aspirations or ambitions as lofty.The Leicester model .... Aye sounds easy why dont all clubs do this
Prat
Brighton's ambitions are beyond Ashley's for Newcastle. They've pumped millions into their training facilities, their stadium, they've a more joined-up, ambitious approach to recruitment, to managerial appointments.Stop being daft. Newcastle have competed with those 3 teams and you know they have.
They will still never win fuck all. Liverpool and City etc are light years ahead of them in every single department and always will be
Not when the season began they didn't, they panic buyed a load of shite in January which included, Hogan (9.5M), Bree(3.5M), Hourihane (3.5M), Lansburys (3M), Bjarnsson (2m) and finished 13th.
When the season kicked off, as mentioned, NUFC broke the Championship transfer for most money spent, by miles aswell.
Could have said the same about Man City but swapped Liverpool and Man City, for Chelsea and Man Utd. Always is an awfully long time. Who, in 2010, could have predicted that the Premier League table in 2020 would have been topped by an undefeated Liverpool, reigning champions Man City and f***ing Leicester? That Wolves and sheffield United would be above Arsenal and Spurs.They will still never win fuck all. Liverpool and City etc are light years ahead of them in every single department and always will be
Could have said the same about Man City but swapped Liverpool and Man City, for Chelsea and Man Utd. Always is an awfully long time. Who, in 2010, could have predicted that the Premier League table in 2020 would have been topped by an undefeated Liverpool, reigning champions Man City and f***ing Leicester? That Wolves and sheffield United would be above Arsenal and Spurs.
The same City who until got major investment were nowhere to be seen ?
Depends which way you want to look at it.Do transfers in January not count now?
Soon
[/QUOTE
I wouldn’t be too cocksure if I were you
They can hope for a return to it, they can realistically say that it's not beyond the club. In terms of expectations? I guess it's relevant, but it becomes less significant as time moves on. The early 90s was >25yrs ago. By comparison, Newcastle stopped being a European regular 13 yrs ago.
Villa spent c£55m in the summer, Newcastle spent c£57m.Not when the season began they didn't, they panic buyed a load of shite in January which included, Hogan (9.5M), Bree(3.5M), Hourihane (3.5M), Lansburys (3M), Bjarnsson (2m) and finished 13th.
When the season kicked off, as mentioned, NUFC broke the Championship transfer for most money spent, by miles aswell.
Lunch break...since Man Utd were the first team to play in Europe in 1955/56 the mags have been in Europe 16 times, and not 49 times. For comparison LFC (44/21 and EFC, who you are way bigger than apparently 17/48). It is easy to cherry pick a period like you have - where you only missed two years but most clubs can find a purple patch, e.g. for the same number of 13 seasons from 1899 onwards Sunderland were in the top 3 seven times....its irrelevant to today.