• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

New CEO appointed..

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mrjardine said:
Fair enough mate I must’ve missed those.

The whole Reiver, Madbob nonsense just makes a mockery of it really. Either posting in an attempt to make themselves appear more important than they actually are or just on a daft windup.
Click to expand...
To be fair Madbob does get info I’m sure of that, Reiver just got carried away with his life of fine wines, fine art and penthouses
 
safcforever said:
There’s a few that found out some information for people they know.
@elsy was obviously linked to Bent
@spitfire knew about Dick returning (night have been a guess)
@dennis longhorn did know some stuff but I think his source left the club
@Iceman another one that called a fair few right
Click to expand...


I didn't have any connection at all to the club but rather to the Irish Banks when the club were borrowing from them. Got to see some sensitive documents at that time. Up to date balance sheets, loan documents etc. It was from that connection that someone I knew had really good connections in the sport world - contracts and that - I got tipped the wink about Dick. It was on the Saturday if I remember correctly and I couldn't get a bet on as he wasn't even showing in the online bookies. Went to Billy Hills the next day and got one on. I didn't go silly and made a couple of grandish. Was tempted to tip the wink to a few on here, but it really was given to me in the strictest confidence so hoyed a couple of very cryptic clues up on here. I had previously divulged some info on the clubs accounts before that to a couple of posters and one couldn't keep it under their hat which could have caused me a load of shit at the time, so I was very nervous about splurging out the Dick stuff.


Thats it I'm afraid - nothing more nothing less. I used to get more information on Arsenal than SAFC.

Not an ITK at all.
 
When stuff does not happen as it was 1st posted, well just let me give a quick example.
The Chronicle were supposed to run with SAFC story on the figures the CEO appointment and the new direction the club was moving in.
However the Chronicle decided to do a full page bit on the scum about their takeover.
So SD decided if they want to print ANOTHER REPEAT story about Amanda and the beheader instead of our bit well Fuck them and pull our story altogether.
As far as I was told our story was big back page news.
That's how things go wrong, as quick as that. So the news on the delayed figures the CEO coming in and the non takeover / new bodies joining us well that got shoved aside.
So this ITK shite, is a load of shite.
 
MADBOB THE MAKEM said:
When stuff does not happen as it was 1st posted, well just let me give a quick example.
The Chronicle were supposed to run with SAFC story on the figures the CEO appointment and the new direction the club was moving in.
However the Chronicle decided to do a full page bit on the scum about their takeover.
So SD decided if they want to print ANOTHER REPEAT story about Amanda and the beheader instead of our bit well Fuck them and pull our story altogether.
As far as I was told our story was big back page news.
That's how things go wrong, as quick as that. So the news on the delayed figures the CEO coming in and the non takeover / new bodies joining us well that got shoved aside.
So this ITK shite, is a load of shite.
Click to expand...

First issue, why is Donald in bed with a pro Newcastle rag. Secondly he must be simple if he thinks a little bit of news for safc is on huge interest to a mag based paper.
Third, getting binned off for a massive takeover for the mags in their own paper makes sense.
So basically, we got a poor CEO ✅
Accounts delayed (never mentioned previously) if our non takeover and the above are back one news for that tag then they must be desperate.
Lesson for dippy Donlad, don’t get into bed with Mags.
 
MADBOB THE MAKEM said:
When stuff does not happen as it was 1st posted, well just let me give a quick example.
The Chronicle were supposed to run with SAFC story on the figures the CEO appointment and the new direction the club was moving in.
However the Chronicle decided to do a full page bit on the scum about their takeover.
So SD decided if they want to print ANOTHER REPEAT story about Amanda and the beheader instead of our bit well Fuck them and pull our story altogether.
As far as I was told our story was big back page news.
That's how things go wrong, as quick as that. So the news on the delayed figures the CEO coming in and the non takeover / new bodies joining us well that got shoved aside.
So this ITK shite, is a load of shite.
Click to expand...
So the story got pulled in its entirety? Fair enough. Yet @Vauxie and @Gillythedilf both reckoned at the time that the article was there on the Saturday with the content you were talking about? But you're saying it wasn't?
Wearside Wanderer II said:
Accounts delayed (never mentioned previously) if our non takeover and the above are back one news for that tag then they must be desperate.
Click to expand...
They only applied to delay the filing of the accounts yesterday
 
Last edited:
Ashley In!! said:
So the story got pulled in its entirety? Fair enough. Yet @Vauxie and @Gillythedilf both reckoned at the time that the article was there on the Saturday with the content you were talking about? But you're saying it wasn't?

They only applied to delay the filing of the accounts yesterday
Click to expand...

Which doesn’t fit in with Mad Bobs claims
Let’s be honest his two pals are embarrassing, they back him up like some cult leader.
I wouldn’t show me face in public If I fanboi’d someone like they do
 
Last edited:
MADBOB THE MAKEM said:
When stuff does not happen as it was 1st posted, well just let me give a quick example.
The Chronicle were supposed to run with SAFC story on the figures the CEO appointment and the new direction the club was moving in.
However the Chronicle decided to do a full page bit on the scum about their takeover.
So SD decided if they want to print ANOTHER REPEAT story about Amanda and the beheader instead of our bit well Fuck them and pull our story altogether.
As far as I was told our story was big back page news.
That's how things go wrong, as quick as that. So the news on the delayed figures the CEO coming in and the non takeover / new bodies joining us well that got shoved aside.
So this ITK shite, is a load of shite.
Click to expand...
..little tip 'Bob'... The Chronicle will never run us as a story in front of the Mags.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DH4
MADBOB THE MAKEM said:
When stuff does not happen as it was 1st posted, well just let me give a quick example.
The Chronicle were supposed to run with SAFC story on the figures the CEO appointment and the new direction the club was moving in.
However the Chronicle decided to do a full page bit on the scum about their takeover.
So SD decided if they want to print ANOTHER REPEAT story about Amanda and the beheader instead of our bit well Fuck them and pull our story altogether.
As far as I was told our story was big back page news.
That's how things go wrong, as quick as that. So the news on the delayed figures the CEO coming in and the non takeover / new bodies joining us well that got shoved aside.
So this ITK shite, is a load of shite.
Click to expand...

:lol: :lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: SVU
Ashley In!! said:
So the story got pulled in its entirety? Fair enough. Yet @Vauxie and @Gillythedilf both reckoned at the time that the article was there on the Saturday with the content you were talking about? But you're saying it wasn't?

They only applied to delay the filing of the accounts yesterday
Click to expand...
I’ll hold my water on my theory for now which I still stand by and had clarification on from a couple of people.
It wasn’t bob who Confirmed my theory and he’s never named names to me on this certain group,others have who I trust.

and yes it is linked to the mags story on the back page in a roundabout way.I thought bob was being cryptic as fuck but obviously not.
Wearside Wanderer II said:
Which doesn’t fit in with Mad Bobs claims
Let’s be honest his two pals are embarrassing, they back him up like some cult leader.
I wouldn’t show me face in public If I fanboi’d someone like they do
Click to expand...

pathetic this type of crack mind and you obviously must have been hammering the Buckfast last night.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top