kildaremackem
Striker
nothing has been announced no...She's already won hasn't she?
the barclays executives got cleared of wrongdoing but dont know what that means for her case..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nothing has been announced no...She's already won hasn't she?
Yep Staveley doesn't have the money for her share, got a sub from Big Bad Mike. As you pointed out, seems a bit odd that the multi billionaires involved inthe deal haven't helped her out.She's in deep shit.
Let's face it the other owners could cover for her in this case. There's absolutely no point pretending otherwise.She's in deep shit.
aha..yuou were taklking about hearsay..but the only person deployiong eharsay is you.One of his first posts made out the owners were broke. He stated something along the lines of 'they had to borrow money to purchase the club. Great Start.
That's a negative spin - he is implying they do not have the funds to buy the club, quite clearly. He knows fuck all yet is acting like he does.
Yep Staveley doesn't have the money for her share, got a sub from Big Bad Mike. As you pointed out, seems a bit odd that the multi billionaires involved inthe deal haven't helped her out.
It was intentional to pull someone one up for being very impolite by calling someone a liar without cause and lacking respect. You might regard it as ironic I did not show your mate the same level of respect but their comments do not warrant respect.
Let's face it the other owners could cover for her in this case. There's absolutely no point pretending otherwise.
aha..yuou were taklking about hearsay..but the only person deployiong eharsay is you.
its only hearsay that there are other owners than staveley..and its only hearsay how much dough they have.
ots not hearsay to say the saudis have the cash..and the rreuneb brothers..its hearsay that they are involved though..and its you citing that hearsay.
what is not hearsay is that amanda stavely is involved..and its not hearsay to state she doesnt have the cash..
argh..she isnt broker in this..she is a shareholder..she was just a bbrioker ont he city deal so didnt need cash..she is not a brokr on this she is a shareholder..The Reuben brothers are listen in Companies House mate. JV1 is linked to PCP and all the other holding accounts. That's not hearsay. It's there in black and white that they are involved. There net worth can easily be found to it's published.
She is also the broker, of course she doesn't have money. She didn't have the money to buy Man City either yet brokered that deal. Honestly, you sir are an idiot and I'm not just talking about your inability to form sentences.
argh..she isnt broker in this..she is a shareholder..she was just a bbrioker ont he city deal so didnt need cash..she is not a brokr on this she is a shareholder..
pcp in the uk took this loan..not the ruebens..who have publcially stated they are not currently invested in pcp..
So why is she putting £17 million in then?The 'loan' is likely a way of transferring her 10% of shares or the funds for her 10%. This is likely what she is getting out of brokering the deal.
..eehh, bring it onWe might not have to wait long....Craig Hope of the Mail is saying an announcement is due .
We shall see....
The Ruebens formed a company with Staveley the same day the charge notice was put into companies house!argh..she isnt broker in this..she is a shareholder..she was just a bbrioker ont he city deal so didnt need cash..she is not a brokr on this she is a shareholder..
pcp in the uk took this loan..not the ruebens..who have publcially stated they are not currently invested in pcp..
World in choas, everyone on lockdown, global recession on its way, crowds of more than 2 people banned and t h r bubble about to pop but Newcastle fans "we are going to be propa mint"
aye thats right..but if she was getting 10 per cent for brokering it..she would be getting it off the other partners..not off ashley..becayuse she is the broker for the other partners..not for the seller..buty the only person to do a deal with her so far is ashley..why would ashley be bunging her 10 per cent? its the people she is working for that are supposed to be doing that?The 'loan' is likely a way of transferring her 10% of shares or the funds for her 10%. This is likely what she is getting out of brokering the deal.
The Ruebens formed a company with Staveley the same day the charge notice was put into companies house!
serling quite lowly valued aginst the dollar as well makes uk asset cheapo..I'm not saying I think it will happen or that we will be cash rich etc but now is the ideal time to purchase anything really, especially if your wealth is unquestionable. If you had money now you would snap up property etc whilst it was low. If the game went bust and you could sweep in and pick what you wanted it makes the most sense.
Ffs! Nobody knows, so stop asking!aye thats right..but if she was getting 10 per cent for brokering it..she would be getting it off the other partners..not off ashley..becayuse she is the broker for the other partners..not for the seller..buty the only person to do a deal with her so far is ashley..why would ashley be bunging her 10 per cent? its the people she is working for that are supposed to be doing that?