• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

March to June 2020 - NEWCASTLE UTD fc

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kestrel 9 said:
We might not have to wait long....Craig Hope of the Mail is saying an announcement is due .
We shall see....
Click to expand...
It is testimony to the allure of the club that after all these years of being stripped back and hollowed out it still is a sought after asset.

No other asset Ashley (known as the Locust in the Industry) has ever preserved a higher value than book.

The strength of the brand is down to one man, more than anyone else. Kevin Keegan. Twice European footballer of the year.

This should be a time to bring him back in an ambassadorial role.
 

Wolfhunter said:
You've gone from pretending to know exactly what's going on, and getting it wrong, to asking questions like a 10 year old!

Nobody knows the full story yet, it's guess work, so just wait and see!
Click to expand...
i know im guessing..but the reason ive started asking more questions at this stage is there is a definite expert here to answer them..
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
Not necessarily. With a vendor loan (and it is described as such in the charge) the shares to be acquired can be the subject of the loan, with the loan being repaid by the payment of the price over the loan term. Presumably done in the absence of other assets as security for the instalments (cf Short's charges over Sunderland and SAFC after the Madrox takeover).
Click to expand...
I was about to mention Short / Madrox.
 
Cant believe they are showing no loyalty to Mike after keeping them in the premier league and bankrolling them for all of these years.

Looks like Bruce is just going to thrown aside as well, I thought he was one of them ..... No loyalty at all !!!!!!
 
Last edited:
mag in peace said:
I love the sheer amount of Sunderland fans throwing this out too :lol: Were you outraged by the Saudi investment in Sheff Utd?

Wish I could post the Michael Jackson popcorn gif, this thread is class.

Made up knowledge of the deal, The irony of the thread title as bloke who can not spell is a Sunderland fan giving the low down and sheer jealously everywhere. It hasn't even happened yet :)
Click to expand...

Put your tiny cheesy cock away man you sad fucker.

Mods, merge this with the other mag shite pls.
 
kildaremackem said:
one thing i dont get ???(stevely is in for 10 per cent) thats £30

yes to an extent..,but his guesses are more informed than mine..and he doesnt pretend to be certain about any of it..
Click to expand...

Yes. You can take security potentially or actually worth more than the loan. in fact it's prudent to do that, as breakup asset values are much lower than going concern ones. Again, look at the aggregate value of security taken by Short for the balance of the SAFC deal. Way more than the deal cost.
 
Wolfhunter said:
But he's still just guessing at this point!
Click to expand...

Of course I can't be certain, other than in the nature (not the detail) of the loan. As in all of these things, until documentary evidence comes to light, they're informed hypotheses based on whatever information is available, to be revised as and when more detail comes to light.
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
Yes. You can take security potentially or actually worth more than the loan. in fact it's prudent to do that, as breakup asset values are much lower than going concern ones. Again, look at the aggregate value of security taken by Short for the balance of the SAFC deal. Way more than the deal cost.
Click to expand...
as someone who had clients in a company called burford capital..im very very aware that litigation is a hard asset to price! wer got burned quite a bit!
mag in peace said:
^^ A posh way of saying I know fuck all.
Click to expand...
the term you are looking for isnt posh..its educated..
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
Of course I can't be certain, other than in the nature (not the detail) of the loan. As in all of these things, until documentary evidence comes to light, they're informed hypotheses based on whatever information is available, to be revised as and when more detail comes to light.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's all I was saying!

The fact that Ashley has charged a loan to Staveley is confusing. We won't know the reasons behind that until or if the deal goes through.
 
kildaremackem said:
as someone who had clients in a company called burford capital..im very very aware that litigation is a hard asset to price! wer got burned quite a bit!

the term you are looking for isnt posh..its educated..
Click to expand...

So you only lend a fraction of the value,
mag in peace said:
^^ A posh way of saying I know fuck all.
Click to expand...

Simple yes/no question. Has Ashley loaned cash or shares in Newcastle to Amanda Staveley?
 
Secret Visage said:
To be fair this is actual news so should run on its own.

Will also leave a nice trail should a mag purge be needed.
Click to expand...

Fair point marra, honestly couldn't give a a shite about it. Sad as fuck seeing all the snivly litter tossers on here... if the shoe was on the other foot last thing would cross my mind would be posting on one of their forums (clearly no decent one's, with shit crack) given the fuckers spend every minute of their sad existence on ours.
 
Wolfhunter said:
Yeah, that's all I was saying!

The fact that Ashley has charged a loan to Staveley is confusing. We won't know the reasons behind that until or if the deal goes through.
Click to expand...

What it says for certain is that Ashley has loaned something to Staveley. Either cash to buy shares in Newcastle United Ltd or the shares themselves. The speculative part is trying to work out why.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top