JohnSmithUK
Winger
You can tell at a glance who designed that layout as it looks identical to every other Tilke snoozefest on the calendar.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can tell at a glance who designed that layout as it looks identical to every other Tilke snoozefest on the calendar.
New F1 tyre wear television graphic is "misleading", says Pirelli | RaceFans
Formula 1's official tyre supplier has cast doubt on the accuracy of the sport's new television graphics which claim to show how worn drivers' tyres are.www.racefans.net
So yep, total bollocks, as we all said
Cannot understand why the car changing the brake balance depending where the car is on track, is illegal, but the kers deployment can be controlled by the car, depending on where the car is in the track, and that's totally fine.
Driving unaided is a totally stupid phrase to use these days anyway. These cars simply wouldn't be able to drive out of the pits without driver aids.
I'm only a casual fan of F1 so forgive this post if its bollocks but for the first time I noticed an actual tread on the tyres today watching the practice.
Is this the new TV camera??
its a new thing. Its clearly come from the F1 games in order to make it easier for the casual fan, but anyone knows understands anything about the tyres will quickly dismiss it.
So is it just a fake graphic. Whats the point that??
If pirelli branding was green, then will have been intermediate tyres. p3 was damp at the start so will probably have used to clear a bit of waterI'm only a casual fan of F1 so forgive this post if its bollocks but for the first time I noticed an actual tread on the tyres today watching the practice.
Is this the new TV camera??
New F1 tyre wear television graphic is "misleading", says Pirelli | RaceFans
Formula 1's official tyre supplier has cast doubt on the accuracy of the sport's new television graphics which claim to show how worn drivers' tyres are.www.racefans.net
So yep, total bollocks, as we all said
Cannot understand why the car changing the brake balance depending where the car is on track, is illegal, but the kers deployment can be controlled by the car, depending on where the car is in the track, and that's totally fine.
Driving unaided is a totally stupid phrase to use these days anyway. These cars simply wouldn't be able to drive out of the pits without driver aids.
We were totally spoilt with the BBC coverage in the 80s & 90s.
The other channels efforts don't seem so bad in hindsight.
Sky coverage is dreadful as they will try to 'add value' to anything and just ends up with almost perpetual filler.
Unfortunately, it looks like we're stuck with them.
Most of the new graphics are part of the F1 deal and amazon web services. Sky just buy the world feed and broadcast that.We were totally spoilt with the BBC coverage in the 80s & 90s.
The other channels efforts don't seem so bad in hindsight.
Sky coverage is dreadful as they will try to 'add value' to anything and just ends up with almost perpetual filler.
Unfortunately, it looks like we're stuck with them.
Shame Ted isn't around as much this season, some of the pit lane and notebook insight is great.I enjoy their coverage to be honest. It’s a million times better than channel 4 and the wanker who presents it who confuses shouting with enthusiasm. Can’t f***ing abide it.
Plus Sky have Martin Brundle.
You’re wearing rose tinted glasses...We were totally spoilt with the BBC coverage in the 80s & 90s
I think for the money they pay, there’s nothing else on their radar than F1. Something daft like 20% of F1s total income comes from the UK Sky TV deal (if memory/facts serve me correctly).I think its all much of a muchness tbh.
But on Sky, there's just so much more coverage. Possibly too much.
Said before, they should have called it a motorsport channel, not F1.
Most of them are mice with hats, in fairnessi didnt know mexico city was so huge, 21 million people living there.
I think its all much of a muchness tbh.
But on Sky, there's just so much more coverage. Possibly too much.
Said before, they should have called it a motorsport channel, not F1.