• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

SAFC Takeover Latest

Status
Not open for further replies.

chunksafc said:
But if they have found that and instigated it, what else could they have found?

That was kind of my point, they are carrying out serious dd and that will inevitably cause delays.
Click to expand...
And they wouldn't instigate a large case re: Alvarez if the takeover wasn't at an extremely advanced stage.
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
And that is a matter of opinion based on what my assessment of the information Reiver's been given. I've actually posted very little concrete information, and what I have has come from sources who ought to know. Principally confirming the identity of the firm conducting due diligence, and the date on which I was told it was scheduled to complete. Most of the time, I've been passing on stuff that Reiver wants to put out, but can't because he's been banned. I do state my opinions on what I believe to be happening; if people choose to interpret that as fact, then clearly I need to tighten up my writing style, as I'm obviously not distinguishing clearly enough between the very little hard fact I have, the information I'm passing on from Reiver, and my considered assessment of what's happening. For this my reward is character assassination. Thanks a bunch.
Click to expand...
Ignore the miserable buggers on here GOM, they’re in the minority, but tend to shout the loudest. I could claim that I’m 99% certain the sun will come up in the morning and the usual suspects would start shouting and querying my judgement at 3-4 o’clock in the morning because it hadn’t happened. They just can’t help themselves.
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
And that is a matter of opinion based on what my assessment of the information Reiver's been given. I've actually posted very little concrete information, and what I have has come from sources who ought to know. Principally confirming the identity of the firm conducting due diligence, and the date on which I was told it was scheduled to complete. Most of the time, I've been passing on stuff that Reiver wants to put out, but can't because he's been banned. I do state my opinions on what I believe to be happening; if people choose to interpret that as fact, then clearly I need to tighten up my writing style, as I'm obviously not distinguishing clearly enough between the very little hard fact I have, the information I'm passing on from Reiver, and my considered assessment of what's happening. For this my reward is character assassination. Thanks a bunch.
Click to expand...

ignore the haters marra. Like kids at Christmas who got an action man instead of a buzz light year
 
WildinHetton said:
Find it staggering that good posters on here such as Riv, Gom and Shaun61 have had to take such a lack of faith by nardowells the like of had no credibility such as they had. f***ing beggars belief the useless twats who've caused up roar with their childish rants and abuse. When the takeover takes place I hope the mods have the decency to ban the fuckers for 12 months so healthy conversations between true supporters can resume. Fuck you ya sad little *****.
Click to expand...
Well done mate exactly what mods should do .These cant be fans really,i asked earlier if this rat gadgie could be vouched for or is he a mag
 
Abu Dhabi Red and White said:
The takeover will be completed beyond infinity...
Click to expand...
when it does I’ll have a Woody
stevo said:
Well done mate exactly what mods should do .These cant be fans really,i asked earlier if this rat gadgie could be vouched for or is he a mag
Click to expand...

the rat is not a mag.
He doesn’t cope well with confrontation and sometimes comes across as brash but he’s not a bad lad really and gets a raw deal by those replying to him rather than his posts.
 
Last edited:
The Rat said:
I’ve said they’re both good posters and people they just won’t have inside knowledge

How’s that attacking, usual abuse from the usual suspects

This place is mad these days


I can be a bit of adick sometimes

But if someone can quote one thing I’ve said bad here I’d be amazed!

Just logged in and had about 3 posts telling me to fuck off :lol:


The takeover will go through as it was reported on the back of the times and the financial times, not because the smb said so
Click to expand...

If I’m being generous, about 70% of what you post is shite IMO and sometimes quite confrontational but there’s still a gang like set of bullies round up on you in a fairly obvious way. But you clearly aren’t in the popular crew so your right to voice an opinion isn’t defended as it is for others.
 
The Sheepfolds End said:
If I’m being generous, about 70% of what you post is shite IMO and sometimes quite confrontational but there’s still a gang like set of bullies round up on you in a fairly obvious way. But you clearly aren’t in the popular crew so your right to voice an opinion isn’t defended as it is for others.
Click to expand...
To be fair about 70% of what we all post is shite.

I have to say I have noticed lately that people reply more to the poster than the actual content
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top