• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Takeover Rumours

Status
Not open for further replies.

If the Alvarez case was holding it up it’s a joke ... I think it’s just due dilligence dragging on ... actually I don’t have a clue and nor do 99% of the posters
 
I do wonder how, if Charlie M has put this altogether, he gets compensated other than in the long term, as I thought that he only had 6 percent of the shares. I did wonder whether SD would restructure the shareholding utilising the exit of Sartori to release shares to Charlie M to get him an allocation of shares as a payment whilst allowing him to retain 6% moving forward. All of this is pure speculation, as I don't know whether Sartori is exiting, but but he hasn't been mentioned in the dispatches referencing who will be with the club moving forward. I would imagine that Juan will want the full amount for his shares if he chooses to sell, leaving Charlie with no real short term return if he ends up retaining 6%. Just random thoughts..........
 
ReaL Madras said:
I do wonder how, if Charlie M has put this altogether, he gets compensated other than in the long term, as I thought that he only had 6 percent of the shares. I did wonder whether SD would restructure the shareholding utilising the exit of Sartori to release shares to Charlie M to get him an allocation of shares as a payment whilst allowing him to retain 6% moving forward. All of this is pure speculation, as I don't know whether Sartori is exiting, but but he hasn't been mentioned in the dispatches referencing who will be with the club moving forward. I would imagine that Juan will want the full amount for his shares if he chooses to sell, leaving Charlie with no real short term return if he ends up retaining 6%. Just random thoughts..........
Click to expand...
6% of a business with these guys involved is worth a hell of a lot more than 6% at present!
 
Fletch said:
If the Alvarez case was holding it up it’s a joke ... I think it’s just due dilligence dragging on ... actually I don’t have a clue and nor do 99% of the posters
Click to expand...
I'd wager £100000 that that figure is somewhere between 99.99 and 100% marra
 
For the decent people on here, this is the latest message I've received, last night, below in bold.

For the rest.

Please tell me how I could've invented a story, two weeks back, that an art dealer who supplies his friend Glenn Fuhrman had shown me a WhatsApp message, at his home, confirming he'd bought the club.
I posted that information, as fact, on the board. I also posted that the owners would be arriving for the 'Burton game' which subsequently happened. I said Donald would be flying up to meet them which was subsequently confirmed. Shouting 'liar' might carry some weight if any of you had proved me wrong or posted the slightest piece of contradictory evidence. But, in reality, you have nothing but feet stamping and toy throwing. It's obvious that some of you, for whatever sick reasons, are desperate for this takeover to fail. Either that or you get your kicks out of posting infantile drivel on a chat for. I won't be interrogated on here by a small bunch of bitter losers ... If anyone wants to call me a liar to my face I'm at your disposal.

“Things still going really well and hopefully an announcement next week but common sense tells you that both sides have been instructed by the lawyers to keep their mouths shut until it’s made official via an official media conference as the current silence from SAFC’s hierarchy is absolutely deafening.
Although Jack Ross refered to having talked to some of the new owners in his pre Accrington media conference today, it generally seems as if the whole club is in lockdown although they’re going to have to come above ground for Accrington on Saturday. It will be interesting to see how many media bods raise the takeover question in the lead up to the game and in the post match media conference with management and players, because it will be beyond belief if the subject does not get raised and would suggest that there is some sort of media embargo in place forbidding questions on the subject. It’s happening, it’s close”.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought SD said the only lawsuits outstanding were in our favour??? The club need to move on from the Alvarez ordeal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top