• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Newcastle FC (june/july2019)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Didn't Pearson turn them round and have them playing great football in the second half of the season before they won it?
 
cosmicchris00 said:
To be fair, any mag that comes on here needs a thick skin.

I like a bit of banter but it nearly always ends like this
Click to expand...

I agree, (a thick skin is something I lack unfortunately) and on the whole people on here have been very welcoming, of course I have had the friendly piss taking, it's to be expected and something I can handle. But Zig is just very aggressive and hateful it wouldn't matter how I behaved on here. Unless I agreed with everything Sunderland fans said which is absurd. Simply answering questions with replies that disagree means I am being a typical mag.

That man needs to chill a bit.. but hey that's his issues and I have him on ignore so it's all cool.

I wouldn't bother replying to this as he is like the school bully and his clique wont take kindly to anyone disagreeing with them or even agreeing with someone who disagrees with them, or else you would end up in the firing line lol.

I agree though, a thicker skin is required, and I will take the shit when I deserve it.
 
Amaw said:
I agree, (a thick skin is something I lack unfortunately) and on the whole people on here have been very welcoming, of course I have had the friendly piss taking, it's to be expected and something I can handle. But Zig is just very aggressive and hateful it wouldn't matter how I behaved on here. Unless I agreed with everything Sunderland fans said which is absurd. Simply answering questions with replies that disagree means I am being a typical mag.

That man needs to chill a bit.. but hey that's his issues and I have him on ignore so it's all cool.

I wouldn't bother replying to this as he is like the school bully and his clique wont take kindly to anyone disagreeing with them or even agreeing with someone who disagrees with them, or else you would end up in the firing line lol.

I agree though, a thicker skin is required, and I will take the shit when I deserve it.
Click to expand...

fuck right off you sniveling little mag twat.
 
Craig Hope has his tongue so far up Benetiz's hoop that he can lick his lips for him

Article in the Fail claiming FSW knew nothing of the announcement and was only told by a friend when the announcement came out :lol:
 
Born Never Asked said:
-13 million spend I am sure Sky said last night over the three years, I know net spend dosnt apply in Sunderland but it does to the rest of the country.
Click to expand...

You know what net spend really means? It means you constantly spend more on players than you claw back in sales. Our net spend under Short was something like £240m. Much good it did us. What Ashley does is refuse to spend stupid money on 30 years olds who go on a free 2 or 3 years later. Huge net spend to improve league position is the economics of the madhouse. Every one place improvement in League position brings in a extra £2m in PL money. That's £10m for 5 places, but you want Ashley to spend £100m+ doing it. Irrational. The ideal net spend is zero and to maintain you desired league position with it.

If you have a net spend of £100m every year, that means that over 10 years, £1bn has to be found from somewhere. Here's a hint - selling out a ground won't do it.
 
The way the mags are going on your think he was dead

He did nothing different to other managers with them f***ing simpletons
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top