McCann Doc coming to Netflix

Remember Robbied was saying that changing their Statement/ lying was evidence they killed Maddie.
You said -
"There is strong evidence that they told lies, so as Robbied1 suggested, them changing their statements is evidence."
@robbied1 is this true?
 


Changing statements is evidence of absolutely nothing man. You are talking absolute rubbish here.
The case is still unsolved and she is still missing so the only thing left to do is look at the evidence.

Just read the thread back a few pages. He was saying the McCann's lying was evidence they did it.
What evidence did you think he meant when you agreed with him?
Been back through and cant see him make that comment either it was deleted or I've missed it, can you link it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll refer you to this post.

McCann Doc coming to Netflix

I was just sticking up for robbied1 as epping rubbished his reply, in fact there was some evidence and I was just trying to point that out in the interests of a balanced debate based on evidence.


That cant be ruled out, have you not seen Man on Fire.

I think epping was suggesting that the reason the McCanns were not charged was that there was a complete absence of probative evidence that the parents were complicit in the disappearance of their daughter.

The fact of changing their statements, if indeed they so did, is not evidence that they had committed a crime.

I gave a witness statement to the police a few years ago and changed my statement a couple of times within the space of two or three hours. I had committed no crime and was simply trying to give an accurate account as possible under strange circumstances.

Bearing in mind the horrendous circumstances and the stress that they must have been under I wouldn't be in the least bit surprised if their initial statements were incomplete or not totally accurate.
 
The case is still unsolved and she is still missing so the only thing left to do is look at the evidence.


Been back through and cant see him make that comment either it was deleted or I've missed it, can you link it?
He was involved in a couple of arguments on here and listed stuff that he says is evidence they are guilty.
When you quoted and agreed with him earlier what evidence did you think he meant? If it wasn't evidence of their guilt that is.
 
He was involved in a couple of arguments on here and listed stuff that he says is evidence they are guilty.
When you quoted and agreed with him earlier what evidence did you think he meant? If it wasn't evidence of their guilt that is.
I believe Robbied1 is of the opinion that he doesn't believe the mccans story and epping asked for evidence of why he thought that, robbied1 posted his supposed evidence including 'changing the statements' to me that is a valid point so I backed him up. The case remains unsolved so I'm not ruling anything out.

I've seen robbied1 getting a bit grief on here over the months because of his beliefs and I feel he is not always treat fairly.
 
I believe Robbied1 is of the opinion that he doesn't believe the mccans story and epping asked for evidence of why he thought that, robbied1 posted his supposed evidence including 'changing the statements' to me that is a valid point so I backed him up. The case remains unsolved so I'm not ruling anything out.

I've seen robbied1 getting a bit grief on here over the months because of his beliefs and I feel he is not always treat fairly.
This sounds like you are changing your statement. ;)
 
I believe Robbied1 is of the opinion that he doesn't believe the mccans story and epping asked for evidence of why he thought that, robbied1 posted his supposed evidence including 'changing the statements' to me that is a valid point so I backed him up. The case remains unsolved so I'm not ruling anything out.

I've seen robbied1 getting a bit grief on here over the months because of his beliefs and I feel he is not always treat fairly.
It's a shame that we can't discuss subjects like this without anybody, as you say, being treat unfairly.
The majority on these threads think the McCann's are guilty. None of us know the truth you just have to go for the most logical possibility. To me that's abduction based on there being no body and no evidence she was killed in the apartment.
The only way the McCann's could have killed her and got rid of the body is if it happened before the night she went missing. That would mean their Tapas mates would be involved as well which is too incredible to believe.
 
It's a shame that we can't discuss subjects like this without anybody, as you say, being treat unfairly.
The majority on these threads think the McCann's are guilty. None of us know the truth you just have to go for the most logical possibility. To me that's abduction based on there being no body and no evidence she was killed in the apartment.
The only way the McCann's could have killed her and got rid of the body is if it happened before the night she went missing. That would mean their Tapas mates would be involved as well which is too incredible to believe.
People should not jump to conclusions, Netflix would have been libel if they posted any evidence the parents 'did it' so that's probably the reason why people are watching the documentary then coming on here saying 'the parents didn't do it 100%' the case is still unsolved and nobody knows what happened.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
People should not jump to conclusions, Netflix would have been libel if they posted any evidence the parents 'did it' so that's probably the reason why people are watching the documentary then coming on here saying 'the parents didn't do it 100%' the case is still unsolved and nobody knows what happened.
I've contributed to a lot of these threads over the years and the people saying tbey don't believe they did anything on those threads are the same ones who are saying it here. I don't think the netflix documentary has influenced them in any way. For obvious reasons.
 
But your theory is the biggest load of bollocks going. The chances of a little gorl not being seen by any witnesses is pretty much zero, then her coming into contact with somebody who would want to harm or abduct her by accident or not. If she has just wandered off you would think and had an accident then the body would have been found quite easily. Anyhow you talk about all the other bollocks, but statistically speaking in these cases its someone who is family or knows the child. The chances of her even getting out the apt alone were pretty much zero, never mind not being seen, then getting knocked down by someone who would cover it up, and to think you were trying to belittle me earlier saying i dont undersrand law:lol::lol:
Ben Needhams body wasn’t found quite easily. It’s heavily believed that he died by accident, with the finding of his toy car 15 years later
 
But your theory is the biggest load of bollocks going. The chances of a little gorl not being seen by any witnesses is pretty much zero, then her coming into contact with somebody who would want to harm or abduct her by accident or not. If she has just wandered off you would think and had an accident then the body would have been found quite easily. Anyhow you talk about all the other bollocks, but statistically speaking in these cases its someone who is family or knows the child. The chances of her even getting out the apt alone were pretty much zero, never mind not being seen, then getting knocked down by someone who would cover it up, and to think you were trying to belittle me earlier saying i dont undersrand law:lol::lol:

Great post mate. MCfans will swerve this.
 
My theory is that she was abducted, but to cover their own arse, the parents lied, lied, and lied again. Only getting off because if the support of the British public and some terrible policing by the Portuguese.

The McCann's should have without question been charged with neglect though, and should not be allowed custody over the twins. It also really boils my piss that they've made millions from it, and anyone who has the gall to question them, they sue. (Sp?)
 
According to the Netflix programme Kate McCann found the bedroom window open when she discovered the bairns wasn't there. Why would anyone leave by a window when the back patio door was open, presumably the same way the abductor entered the building. This might seem harsh but thousands of kids go missing each year in the UK alone, why has £11m (I'm sure I heard this figure mentioned) been made available for this case?
 

Back
Top