VARguments

Why? Perfectly good decision. I don’t understand what the commentator is twisting about, unless he’s got a bet on Derby.

The right decision has been found. Better to wait 30 seconds than a team get a goal wrongly allowed.

Utter shite for proper fans at the game - you obviously don't go.
VAR is for when there's been an obvious error - how was that obvious?
 


You can’t just have “clear and obvious errors” though.

Imagine if Luton conceded and it was ruled out by VAR because it was clear and obvious. We conceded and it wasnt ruled out because it wasn’t clear and obvious, although it was offside. Luton go up automatically, we miss out by a goal and then lose in the play-offs.

Much better that the decision is correct than quick.

If they want the goal to stand, don’t be offside.
 
Why did he decide to review if he gave the goal and lined everyone back up? Also, was the ref 100% certain that the ball had definitely left the player who passed the ball before waghorn was offside?
 
The Southampton players & supporters didn't complain ...

... this is just officials wanting to prove that VAR is a wonderful innovation.
 
But that’s bad application of it surely? The technology will continue to improve anyway, goal line technology is instant for example

It's when they decide to use it that needs to change. If there's VAR at a game you will just sit there when Sunderland score until the goal is eventually given.

Anyway - they're arguing now that it wasn't offside so how was the correct decision made?
 
It's when they decide to use it that needs to change. If there's VAR at a game you will just sit there when Sunderland score until the goal is eventually given.

Anyway - they're arguing now that it wasn't offside so how was the correct decision made?
I’ve just seen it. It was a pathetic decision.

And a complete fuck up.

Remember that there will be examples where it has worked well tho
 

Back
Top