Save Seaburn

Definitely not, mines gone up about 40-50k in the 6 years I’ve lived here though. One in Weardale went for about 400k not long ago but had a huge extension
thought they were too close together for "huge" extensions, mainly semis aren't they? 400k hell of a lot for a semi
 


I'm looking forward to the gathering on the fields at South Bents tomorrow night. I'm going to take my bench.
 
Grew up there, this has been planned for longer than ten years, when for no reason the goals and rugby pitch was removed and a no golf sign (understandable given the large amount of walkers that use it) was put up. It is still widely used but as others have said best preserved and used again as recreation as it’s basically the last green space in the area. However I have 100% confidence the council won’t do what’s best as they continually prove.
 
Last edited:
Grew up there, this has been planned for longer than ten years, when for no reason the goals and rugby pitch was removed and a no golf sign (understandable given the large amount of walkers that use it) was put up. It is still widely used but as others have said best preserved and used again as recreation as it’s basically the last green space in the area. However I have 100% confidence the council won’t do what’s best as they continually prove.
Widely used for dog shitting.

Seaburn needs more housing. It's a good spot for it and it will help to bring further private investment in to the beach.

Ha'way the houses.
 
Grew up there, this has been planned for longer than ten years, when for no reason the goals and rugby pitch was removed and a no golf sign (understandable given the large amount of walkers that use it) was put up. It is still widely used but as others have said best preserved and used again as recreation as it’s basically the last green space in the area. However I have 100% confidence the council won’t do what’s best as they continually prove.

The campaign group need to be honest about this. If they want green spaces to walks dogs etc, then thats fine. But they then have to accept there will be little investment in the area, and take full responsibility if visitor numbers drop & business pulls out of the area.

If they want investment & the area regenerated, then they have to accept housing & car parking.

Look at Seaham as an example, but the campaign group deny the existance of east shore village.
 
Widely used for dog shitting.

Seaburn needs more housing. It's a good spot for it and it will help to bring further private investment in to the beach.

Ha'way the houses.

Afraid that you’re talking dog shit if that’s even a genuine feeling. If the councils removed the recreation possibility by taking the goals away then obviously not as wide variety of activities will be enjoyed. You’re lacking any clue if you think it’s only used by dog walkers. Kite surfers, kids use it for football still, runners etc.

There are far better brownfield sites for affordable housing nearby, so that is also dog shite.
 
Afraid that you’re talking dog shit if that’s even a genuine feeling. If the councils removed the recreation possibility by taking the goals away then obviously not as wide variety of activities will be enjoyed. You’re lacking any clue if you think it’s only used by dog walkers. Kite surfers, kids use it for football still, runners etc.

There are far better brownfield sites for affordable housing nearby, so that is also dog shite.
This isn't going to be affordable housing.
It's going to attract and keep people with money in the city :cool:
 

Back
Top