The Fish
Winger
that was it purely who was biggest
probably not much in ti to be fair
Nah, not for clubs like ours. If they'd thrown us two in with Man Utd and Norwich I'd fancy us to to finish 2nd and 3rd. Swapping places depending on the day.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
that was it purely who was biggest
probably not much in ti to be fair
Pretty sure it was "BroadcastMoose".
either way, talkSport will be ripping their cocks off with glee as twitterwarriors up and down the country "get involved in the debate*"
*call each other names and trot out cliches about each others' clubs.
What was his criteria? Or was it a straight question?
It mostly is, for the fans. Do think it's a factor for players though. They want to play for prestigious clubs which is why, like I say, Burnley will find it harder to attract quality than Everton will.
Like I said, bigness means different things to different fans. Leeds fans will insist it's how many travelling fans you take and push the era that trophies count back a bit, Forest will only count the number of European Cups, Newcastle will talk about fanbase, european football and do everything in our power to steer the conversation away from trophies...Well you just can’t be a prestigious club, you need to win shit...Newcastle and west Ham are two bald guys fighting over a comb.
Like I said, bigness means different things to different fans. Leeds fans will insist it's how many travelling fans you take and push the era that trophies count back a bit, Forest will only count the number of European Cups, Newcastle will talk about fanbase, european football and do everything in our power to steer the conversation away from trophies...
I know we're not a footballing superpower, but a club's "bigness" is a factor in a footballer's decision. Which is why Burnley will find it harder to attract quality players ahead of teams that they finished above, like Everton. Why Leeds are more attractive than Brentford.
Top half finish because of our GD because Benitez played ultra defensive against Man City, which drew severe criticism from pundits. Because Benitez played pragmatic football which was applauded and appreciated by the Newcastle fans despite them demanding cavalier 4-3 football.![]()
Aye but they'd have to pay more than Everton would. Compensation for playing for a "smaller" club.To quote a former top professional (and mag) and now chief exec - "Footballer like Money, and if you pay them enough they will come". Big largely doesn't come into it beyond those players looking for CL football. If Burnley paid higher wages they could recruit now problem as players would be happy to live in South Manchester/Cheshire.
big club, crowds etc mean nowt to a footballer, its all £££££££'s outisde of the top 6.To quote a former top professional (and mag) and now chief exec - "Footballer like Money, and if you pay them enough they will come". Big largely doesn't come into it beyond those players looking for CL football. If Burnley paid higher wages they could recruit now problem as players would be happy to live in South Manchester/Cheshire.
Can't see it personally, times might be a bit tough at NUFC in terms of cash to spend ETC but West Ham are a proper shit club, you'd have to be mad to go there IMO, the best that they can hope for is somebody from abroad wanting to get their foot in the door in the PL
Of course. Utd and them by a distance to ArsenalWithin giving it much thought,who would you say are the two biggest clubs in Germany,Holland,Belgium,Turkey,Russia and France.You'd probably go for the two best known clubs because we'd struggle to name the two most successful clubs in all those countries.Would fans of European clubs be correct in saying Liverpool are bigger than Man City.
Aye but they'd have to pay more than Everton would. Compensation for playing for a "smaller" club.
No, it's purely for the comedy factor, he's not a bad manager imo but he's not world class.Seen as a lot on here would be happy to see him leave!
I take it we now admitting he is a very good manager?
No, it's purely for the comedy factor, he's not a bad manager imo but he's not world class.
Aye but they'd have to pay more than Everton would. Compensation for playing for a "smaller" club.
We do have to compensate them when going up against similar clubs in London. Fortunately there are few similar clubs. Arsenal, Chelsea and Spurs are all much more attractive propositions for any player for a host of reasons. It's only really West Ham that you would say are a similar London club to either or our clubs (when we were both in the top flight).I'd agree with that to extent, but it would work the same way with location as well.
A north east team would have to offer higher wages than a London club and considering all north east teams have a pretty shitty wage structure in comparison, they would lose out on players most of the time
Titus?I'll give myself 6 lashes with a bramble
May he rest in peaceTitus?
Not lower, the same. If Burnley offered more, they'd get their man because he's compensated for playing at a less prestigious club. If they offered the same, the player would plump for Everton.That’s not true...everyone outside the top 4 comes down to league position and amount of money offered. If Everton and Burnley bid for a player, the player would probably take the highest offer. If Everton and Man U bid for a player, Man U would probably get the player at a lower offer. I don’t think Everton would be in same boat with Burnley. The player wouldn’t choose Everton over Burnley at a lower contract.