East Coast line to be taken back into public ownership again

Last time the ECML was in public ownership, it put £1.2bn into the treasury. Stagecoach and Virgin bid more than the franchise was worth but it’s the publics problem? They should be made to pay the franchise cost.

Playing truant on the Sunderland council meeting! tut tut! ;)
 


Yeah try reading again. With the exception of stations. Although network rail run quite a few too.

Is arriva responsible for the track, Bridges and tunnels on that line?
I read it a couple of times and it made no sense.

Arriva are responsible for the ticket machines, network, WiFi, electrics, station screens, etc, etc, etc.

They also have to pay to use national rail’s systems. They also have to put networks on trains and a shit load of systems that hang off that. They have to guarantee to spend millions every year specifically improving the customer journey (e.g media and information deliver). There’s a hell of a lot of expensive infrastructure behind that. Pretty much every operator is similar.

There’s a few facts for you.

How long have you worked in the transport industry marra?

Surely it's the franchisee who has to do the due diligence?
Both
 
I read it a couple of times and it made no sense.

Arriva are responsible for the ticket machines, network, WiFi, electrics, station screens, etc, etc, etc.

They also have to pay to use national rail’s systems. They also have to put networks on trains and a shit load of systems that hang off that. They have to guarantee to spend millions every year specifically improving the customer journey (e.g media and information deliver). There’s a hell of a lot of expensive infrastructure behind that. Pretty much every operator is similar.

There’s a few facts for you.

How long have you worked in the transport industry marra?


Both
I will make it dead easy for you. Does Arriva look after the track or anything else that the trains runs on or under? I specifically said with the exception of stations......
 
Because operators and network rail run them. We have already established that.

So only people who work in the industry are able to read what network rail are responsible for?
Ok, to be clear, network rail also devolved the management of some other infrastructure (track and track-side) last year following policy changes in 2016.

So if you don’t work in the industry how are you so certain in your ‘facts’?
 
Ok, to be clear, network rail also devolved the management of some other infrastructure (track and track-side) last year following policy changes in 2016.

So if you don’t work in the industry how are you so certain in your ‘facts’?
Publically available information. Unless of course network rail lie on their website?....
 
Ok, to be clear, network rail also devolved the management of some other infrastructure (track and track-side) last year following policy changes in 2016.

So if you don’t work in the industry how are you so certain in your ‘facts’?
He might know someone who does and, you know, talk with them

Do we know that they did that?
I thought ending a sentence with a question mark usually indicated that you were not sure of something and were asking a question.
 
They did a canny job last time. Vital Infrastructure like this should always be publicly owned and operated.
Branson blames failure by network rail to implement improvements to the infrastructure that would have increased passenger numbers and thus profitability were not carried out as promised. Lord Adonis admits to this. Dont know how much this has screwed the figures, but as a fairly frequent user I found the service far superior to the likes of Virgin Cross Country and Tp express. Delays are however too frequent (usually due to factors beyond the operators control), and this must be having a negative impact on rail travel.
 

Back
Top