Clairvoyants

Do you reckon they;

A) know they’re conning the public by saying they can communicate

B) genuinely believe they are communicating

Not sure which option makes them more dangerous.
Charlatans, the lot of them. Should be locked up.

"Mary loves Dick, Mary loves Dick"

Almost better than Phoenix Nights :lol: Why are they standing outside the toilets?
 
Last edited:


Things like UFOs & Aliens for starters its all over the History & Quest tv channels its funny how it never ends up in mainstream media unless its useless information etc.
Ok, cool. I love to read about these kinds of things too, genuinely. id class Quest and Histiry as mainstream though, but do think a lot of news worthy 'happenings' go under reported. Been watchimg some of the Jose Escamilla videos about 'rods' recently, forgot how crazy they were, think I was high as a kite last time I watched them, still mind blowing!
 
Monsters who take money from those grieving seeking answers.
"Psychic" Sally actually has bouncers stopping people calling out her show as a complete fraud.

Proper wrong'uns.

As Tim Minchin says - There's no such thing as psychics. They're either lying or mentally ill
 
Do you reckon they;

A) know they’re conning the public by saying they can communicate

B) genuinely believe they are communicating

Not sure which option makes them more dangerous.

A absolutely.

Even this new one in hollywoodland, Tyler Henry, is obviously feeding a line slowly and just reading the reaction to mould his next comment accordingly...


Tyler Henry's Abilities Are Put to the Test During His Reading With Boy George: See Their ''Tough'' Hollywood Medium Meeting! on Hollywood Medium | E! News UK

I'm going to haunt several hundred smbrs when I'm finished.

Can't wait

You certainly thought Bristow was clairvoyant iirc :lol:
 
Last edited:
Do you reckon they;

A) know they’re conning the public by saying they can communicate

B) genuinely believe they are communicating

Not sure which option makes them more dangerous.
Starts as (A) definately
but after they've been doing it a while and they've had lots of practice, it'll become just instinct that they'll start to think the ideas are just coming to them.

that Derek Accorah was caught out because of this. He was just taking clues in from his surroundings without really considering the source so he lost track of where it was coming from.
 
Do you reckon they;

A) know they’re conning the public by saying they can communicate

B) genuinely believe they are communicating

Not sure which option makes them more dangerous.

I've "worked" with some of them. Like any cross section of people there's a mixed bag. There are deliberate fakers and there are people who genuinely think they can see/hear/feel/sense something paranormal. From the latter lot, there are the misguided and mentally ill and there are people who stick to facts and discover very remarkable and weird things which are far from explainable yet not quite conclusive proof.
There are more scientific* and better ways to attempt to investigate the paranormal or supernatural that don't require faith in a person or a belief system. That's why a Paranormal Investigator is quite different to a Medium / Clairvoyant .

* Science can be used to approach, prove or disprove any statement or subject. That's one of it's core functions.
 

Back
Top