“Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims.”

Mohammad must have been some sort of wizard to sanction a death cult some 1400 years after he died. A truly remarkable wizard. A Necromancer in all probability.
It's almost like all his statements and instructions were written down and compiled into a book so muslims in the future could read it and understand how mohammed wanted them to behave.
 


In 2015, a total of 211 completed, failed, or foiled terrorist attacks were reported by EU states, resulting in 151 fatalities (of which 148 were in France, with 130 of them occurring during the November 2015 Paris attacks) and over 360 people injured. As in previous years, separatist attacks accounted for the largest proportion (65), followed by jihadist attacks (17). The latter, however, caused the largest number of fatalities (150) and injuries (250).

Terrorism in Europe - Wikipedia

Depends on what is defined as an attack. Manchester Arena or the Bataclan may be defined as a single attack but can be devastating for a large amount of people.
 
Last edited:
It's almost like all his statements and instructions were written down and compiled into a book so muslims in the future could read it and understand how mohammed wanted them to behave.
Like I say. A necromancer. 1400 years it took for you and the death cult to figure out what Mo the Merciless really really wanted. Nowt between then mind. Nada. Zilch. Niet.

You have to hand it to Mo. That's some trick to pull off. A worthy necromancer indeed.
 
Like I say. A necromancer. 1400 years it took for you and the death cult to figure out what Mo the Merciless really really wanted. Nowt between then mind. Nada. Zilch. Niet.

You have to hand it to Mo. That's some trick to pull off. A worthy necromancer indeed.
I put my money on people misinterpreting his teaching or twisting his words into to suit their own agenda. A bit like what Christians have been doing have being doing in for centuries with the teachings of Jesus. Or how the Nazis viewed evolution and natural selection.
 
Like I say. A necromancer. 1400 years it took for you and the death cult to figure out what Mo the Merciless really really wanted. Nowt between then mind. Nada. Zilch. Niet.

You have to hand it to Mo. That's some trick to pull off. A worthy necromancer indeed.
Strange, I could have sworn that after mo died his successors embarked on conquests of large parts of Asia, Africa and Europe. But yes, apart from that, nothing.

I put my money on people misinterpreting his teaching or twisting his words into to suit their own agenda
You haven't read the quran, have you?
 
Strange, I could have sworn that after mo died his successors embarked on conquests of large parts of Asia, Africa and Europe. But yes, apart from that, nothing.
Yes. Islam was imperialist. A bit like the glorious British Empire.

No terrorism though in the that the death cult sanctions it 1400 yrs later. Obviously following Mo'so instructions.

God you're dumb.
 
Yes. Islam was imperialist. A bit like the glorious British Empire.

No terrorism though in the that the death cult sanctions it 1400 yrs later. Obviously following Mo'so instructions.

God you're dumb.
Terrorism is a form of warfare. Obviously mo didn't specifically state he wanted people to fly planes into buildings and blow up tubes. No, he just said "kill the infidels wherever you may find them".

I'm afraid it's you who's the dumb fucker.
 
I actually think the Iraq war was a mistake. As was our involvement in Afghanistan. We almost made the same mistake in Syria, but non of these come close to flying passenger planes into buildings full of people, or blowing yourself up on a packed tube train.

Yes the acts seem more terroristyy to our psyche. But we killed a whole lot more civvies in them two unjust wars than them two terrorist acts.

I would say that the use of violence (invasion of Iraq) in pursuit of a political aim (forced template of a modern state from the West) is the act of terrorism. The people of Iraq did not want the invasion, the people of Iraq did not want the template of a modern state forced upon them, in my opinion if they did there would have been a form of revolution as has been observed with the Arab spring.

One could argue that we had a hand in the Arab spring too on the sly. Not sure if that helps or hinders your argument tbh. Probably both.

Not returning the Kuwaitis they'd kidnapped during the first Gulf War, not returning the gold etc. they stole during the first Gulf War, and not recognising the right of Kuwait to exist. All of which were required of them under the agreement they signed following the first Gulf War.

But didn't Kuwait used to be Iraqs back in the day?
 
Last edited:
I honestly can't work out why 1st world countries like USA and Europeans don't go and help them. Maybe there's some hidden agenda to do with the debt they owe or the diamonds being sold for cheap from poor countries or maybe its weapon manufacturers are making billions from the fights or what side would we support? Its fucked up why we just stand and watch

Also add North Korea to that. If the country is as fucked as they report then get in and sort it out

Good post mate. Complicated answer. That's if it's a answer. It's just a guess really.

Imo the main reason why we don't have a true honest world police force is the politics involved. The costs and manpower also mean that wars can only be waged on so many fronts. Even like you say sorting Africa out would come with some perks like resources and utilities (I don't count weapon sales as we already make a boat load off them already). The political whim just inst there to do it. All major scuirmishes atm are concentrating in one area of the world. The middle east. Am I allowed to say the reason?

Israel wants it. It shall happen.

They both used to be subjects of the Ottoman Empire, that's about it.

So if Israel can say a book tells us this is our land. Can Saddam not say Kuwait is ours?

If only we could liberate the majority of the Middle East from their religious and undemocratic societies.

It'll never happen but the world would be a better place.

You are what's wrong with this world. Sorry.
 
Last edited:
Can the USA say that Canada is theirs?


Why are you trying to bring Israel into the discussion? What are the similarities?

Same area and our involvenent in both cases possibly? Or just a example of our hypocrisy perhaps? We sanctoned Israel. We manipulated saddam in invading Kuwait. We had already tooled him up and coaxed him into believing the Kuwaitis were stealing his god given right of oil.

P.s USA can say want they want mate. I ain't messing with them.
 
Last edited:
Religion causes most of worlds problems....sad but true...
True. But saying all Muslims are terrorists is like saying all Sunderland fans are wankers just because there's a few on here.

I grew up in Tooting, London, which is roughly 70% Muslims I'd guess, and 99.999999% of them hang their f***ing heads in shame when you mention terrorism, just as you would if a Sunderland fan commited some atrocity in the name of all Mackems.

You haven't read the quran, have you?
You've never asked a Muslim what they think about all this, have you?

That's rhetorical btw. I already know you haven't.
 
Wtf are you on about? What exactly do I need to ask a muslim?
If they're a terrorist? Whether or not murdering innocent people "in the name of Allah" is ok?

You say the Quran promotes violence, and you're right, so does the Bible, yet I don't see you mentioning that.

You're obviously an Islamophobe, no doubt influenced by the Daily Mail or some shite. Pointless trying to have a debate with you tbh.
 

Back
Top