Adam Johnson

[sidneyeric]

Don't understand that. I'm a Sunderland fan and that wanker took the piss out of the club and brought shame on us. Can't understand why a Sunderland fan would 'defend' him or stick up for him.

I'm not defending him.

What is that exactly? Because from my point of view it just looks like you are defending a convicted sex offender who is obviously a bit thick and thinks its acceptable to joke about rape at the expense of the victim.

If thats someone you feel the need to defend then sadly I think it says alot about you too.

Point out where I have defended him.

 

[mag in peace]

For posting facts from the trial judge rather than the media ?

I enjoy doing this, I do it every time the media unleash yet another hatchet job on him, they post lies from "sources" in jail, posters on here then launch into a frenzy he did this he did that said this etc, when I prove it's wrong I get called an apologist, a peado lover, redandwhitenob starts asking me how Faye is because he think I know her, posters start calling others names and the thread gets deleted, until the Sun posts another pack of lies story.

By defending the 'hatchet job' you feel the press are doing you are directly defending Johnson. Perhaps your time would be better spent defending the poor victim who Johnson jokes about raping whilst his family and friends share her identity on social media and send her abuse.

Im not going to argue with you as there is literally no point. You mentioned yourself you idolised him and seem willing to overlook everything else. Thats your perogative. I wouldnt dream of wasting my time feeling the need to respute the claims of the press over a sex offender. They wouldnt be giving him a bad name if he hadnt felt the need to groom a bairn.

 

[Sima]

'He searched the age of consent multiple times'
'No he didn't'

'He started texting her when she was 14'
'No he didn't'

Albeit correctly, you are defending him.

As the closing notes detail, as a grown man he put his fingers inside of the vagina of a child not once but on three occasions.

 

[sidneyeric]

By defending the 'hatchet job' you feel the press are doing you are directly defending Johnson. Perhaps your time would be better spent defending the poor victim who Johnson jokes about raping whilst his family and friends share her identity on social media and send her abuse.

No it doesn't, I'm pointing out what the press are doing, every couple of months they print a story about him, everyone one of them have been false, they are just keeping things ticking over until they can unleash the fury when he's released. I do that because I hate the sun and the way they control people through lies.

'He searched the age of consent multiple times'
'No he didn't'

'He started texting her when she was 14'
'No he didn't'

Albeit correctly, you are defending him.

As the closing notes detail, as a grown man he put his fingers inside of the vagina of a child not once but on three occasions.

No, what I am doing is correcting posters via the trial judges notes.

 

[Sima]

No it doesn't, I'm pointing out what the press are doing, every couple of months they print a story about him, everyone one of them have been false, they are just keeping things ticking over until they can unleash the fury when he's released. I do that because I hate the sun and the way they control people through lies.


No, what I am doing is correcting posters via the trial judges notes.

Defending him while doing so by 'correcting posters'.

 

[mag in peace]

No it doesn't, I'm pointing out what the press are doing, every couple of months they print a story about him, everyone one of them have been false, they are just keeping things ticking over until they can unleash the fury when he's released. I do that because I hate the sun and the way they control people through lies.

We already mentioned and spoke of one that isnt false? Newspapers sensationalise to sell but it wasnt false.

I also hate the sun - i just dont buy it. I dont come onto a forum to chronicle all the ways they have bad mouthed a sex offender. Perhaps find a more worthy cause.

 

[geordiedean]

I took a lot of interest in this case because he was one of my favourite players in my club, I'll say it yet again, I do not agree with in any way shape or form what he did, I also do not agree with people who post lies in an attempt to make him look like something he isn't, anything I post about this case is all available online case facts and not media spin.


Of course it is, I have not defended what he said, I said it's been taking out of context to further destroy someone who has done a good job of destroying himself.

Again ill ask you in your opinion what is he??

Fact is hes a convicted child sex offender what cant you get about that?

 

[maghater]

How much more serious can you get than a sexual act with a child??

Depends on how you define "child", I have a 15 year old niece who would take great offence if you called her a child. Probably worth bearing in mind that the age of consent in large parts of Europe is 15, or even younger 14 in Germany.

 

[geordiedean]

Depends on how you define "child", I have a 15 year old niece who would take great offence if you called her a child. Probably worth bearing in mind that the age of consent in large parts of Europe is 15, or even younger 14 in Germany.

Another apologist here asking how to define child. Anyone under the age of 16 is a child a dependant. You can quote all you want about ages in other European countries, he didn't commit the act/crime in any of them so its absolutely irrelevant

 

[two left feet]

Depends on how you define "child", I have a 15 year old niece who would take great offence if you called her a child. Probably worth bearing in mind that the age of consent in large parts of Europe is 15, or even younger 14 in Germany.

You need to stop this really - you’re not doing yourself any favours.

Plenty of kids think they are adults but the reality is that she is a minor. He groomed her and has been convicted of behaviour that was against the law. As such he’s been convicted.

The nuances between what is printed in newspapers does not deflect from his crime.

I wish this thread would just die as it’s an embarrassment to this forum.

 

[Sima]

Probably worth noting that there are safeguards in place in Germany for example to stop, say, a 50 year old humping a 14 year old.

 

[Rizla]

Depends on how you define "child", I have a 15 year old niece who would take great offence if you called her a child. Probably worth bearing in mind that the age of consent in large parts of Europe is 15, or even younger 14 in Germany.

The same age as the victims of child sexual exploitation by the South Asian rape gangs up and down the land. Are you going to start defending these gangs by claiming the victims weren't children and should have known better?

 

[geordiedean]

You need to stop this really - you’re not doing yourself any favours.

Plenty of kids think they are adults but the reality is that she is a minor. He groomed her and has been convicted of behaviour that was against the law. As such he’s been convicted.

The nuances between what is printed in newspapers does not deflect from his crime.

I wish this thread would just die as it’s an embarrassment to this forum.

Its an absolute embarrassment that some of your fans still see fit to not only defend his actions but also want to see him represent the club again. These people seriously have some sort of screw loose or no moral compass at all. These people should be investigated themselves as if the thought process they project on here is their actual views then its deeply worrying

 

[Johnnyh]

You need to stop this really - you’re not doing yourself any favours.

Plenty of kids think they are adults but the reality is that she is a minor. He groomed her and has been convicted of behaviour that was against the law. As such he’s been convicted.

The nuances between what is printed in newspapers does not deflect from his crime.

I wish this thread would just die as it’s an embarrassment to this forum.

So do I marra it’s embarrassing the way this threads going.

 

[two left feet]

So do I marra it’s embarrassing the way this threads going.

I log in about once or twice a day and it’s always at the topography the forum. There needs to be a blanket ban on threads concerning that bloke.

 

[maghater]

You need to stop this really - you’re not doing yourself any favours.

not after any favours thank you, he broke the law and was sentenced, I just happen to think that the length of sentence was extremely harsh.

 

[Johnnyh]

Its an absolute embarrassment that some of your fans still see fit to not only defend his actions but also want to see him represent the club again. These people seriously have some sort of screw loose or no moral compass at all. These people should be investigated themselves as if the thought process they project on here is their actual views then its deeply worrying

Give it a rest marra no one on the Sunderland forum defending him. All agreed he’s totally in the wrong. No argument so please just jog on.

 

[stubber]

Haway man lads, knock this thread into the long grass.

 

[Johnnyh]

Haway man lads, knock this thread into the long grass.

Totally agree. Posted this an hour ago. Old news now. Needs binning mate.

 

[maghater]

The same age as the victims of child sexual exploitation by the South Asian rape gangs up and down the land. Are you going to start defending these gangs by claiming the victims weren't children and should have known better?

Dont know what your agenda is mate, I have just tried to make a couple of points to try and bring a bit of balance to an emotive subject, and end up being accused of supporting gang rapes. Just to add balance to that, not all members of these gangs were South Asians, so stop being racist